Network cost allocation methods for pay-as-bid peer-to-peer energy trading: A comparison

In pay-as-bid peer-to-peer (P2P) energy trading, various types of prosumers and consumers can participate, regardless of their offers. Thus, various types of participants impact the network differently. However, very few pay-as-bid P2P energy trading studies have specifically discussed appropriate c...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Noorfatima N., Choi Y., Onen A., Jung J.
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Elsevier 2022-11-01
Series:Energy Reports
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S235248472202340X
_version_ 1797901879490904064
author Noorfatima N.
Choi Y.
Onen A.
Jung J.
author_facet Noorfatima N.
Choi Y.
Onen A.
Jung J.
author_sort Noorfatima N.
collection DOAJ
description In pay-as-bid peer-to-peer (P2P) energy trading, various types of prosumers and consumers can participate, regardless of their offers. Thus, various types of participants impact the network differently. However, very few pay-as-bid P2P energy trading studies have specifically discussed appropriate compensation for network usage, although the market is implemented in existing utility-owned grids. Therefore, to improve the performance of pay-as-bid P2P energy trading, it is important to determine the appropriate compensation to utilities for network usage. This study aims to obtain an appropriate network cost allocation method for pay-as-bid P2P energy trading. Hence, the authors present a review of pay-as-bid P2P market mechanisms and various network cost allocation (NCA) methods. Additionally, a comprehensive evaluation framework is proposed to determine the most appropriate NCA method for the pay-as-bid P2P energy trading system. A comparison was made between various NCA methods to investigate the outcomes of the implementation of different NCA methods to various market conditions. The study constructs a case study based on the operator-oriented P2P model to represent the pay-as-bid P2P energy trading system. The simulation of pay-as-bid P2P energy trading with large participant number is applied in the IEEE 69-bus distribution system. The study concluded that applying the appropriate NCA method would improve the performance of pay-as-bid P2P energy trading operation.
first_indexed 2024-04-10T09:08:56Z
format Article
id doaj.art-8fafebcb2d2b4114b838f588ba565fb9
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2352-4847
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-10T09:08:56Z
publishDate 2022-11-01
publisher Elsevier
record_format Article
series Energy Reports
spelling doaj.art-8fafebcb2d2b4114b838f588ba565fb92023-02-21T05:14:23ZengElsevierEnergy Reports2352-48472022-11-0181444214463Network cost allocation methods for pay-as-bid peer-to-peer energy trading: A comparisonNoorfatima N.0Choi Y.1Onen A.2Jung J.3Department of Energy Systems Research, Ajou University, Suwon, South KoreaDepartment of Energy Systems Research, Ajou University, Suwon, South KoreaDepartment of Electrical-Electronic Engineering, Abdullah Gül University, Kayseri, Turkey; Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, College of Engineering, Sultan Qaboos University, Al-Khoud, Muscat, OmanDepartment of Energy Systems Research, Ajou University, Suwon, South Korea; Correspondence to: Power System Laboratory, Energy Center 210, Ajou University, Worldcup-ro 206, Yeongtong-gu, Suwon, South Korea.In pay-as-bid peer-to-peer (P2P) energy trading, various types of prosumers and consumers can participate, regardless of their offers. Thus, various types of participants impact the network differently. However, very few pay-as-bid P2P energy trading studies have specifically discussed appropriate compensation for network usage, although the market is implemented in existing utility-owned grids. Therefore, to improve the performance of pay-as-bid P2P energy trading, it is important to determine the appropriate compensation to utilities for network usage. This study aims to obtain an appropriate network cost allocation method for pay-as-bid P2P energy trading. Hence, the authors present a review of pay-as-bid P2P market mechanisms and various network cost allocation (NCA) methods. Additionally, a comprehensive evaluation framework is proposed to determine the most appropriate NCA method for the pay-as-bid P2P energy trading system. A comparison was made between various NCA methods to investigate the outcomes of the implementation of different NCA methods to various market conditions. The study constructs a case study based on the operator-oriented P2P model to represent the pay-as-bid P2P energy trading system. The simulation of pay-as-bid P2P energy trading with large participant number is applied in the IEEE 69-bus distribution system. The study concluded that applying the appropriate NCA method would improve the performance of pay-as-bid P2P energy trading operation.http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S235248472202340XPeer-to-peer energy tradingPay-as-bidNetwork cost allocationNetwork usage costEvaluation framework
spellingShingle Noorfatima N.
Choi Y.
Onen A.
Jung J.
Network cost allocation methods for pay-as-bid peer-to-peer energy trading: A comparison
Energy Reports
Peer-to-peer energy trading
Pay-as-bid
Network cost allocation
Network usage cost
Evaluation framework
title Network cost allocation methods for pay-as-bid peer-to-peer energy trading: A comparison
title_full Network cost allocation methods for pay-as-bid peer-to-peer energy trading: A comparison
title_fullStr Network cost allocation methods for pay-as-bid peer-to-peer energy trading: A comparison
title_full_unstemmed Network cost allocation methods for pay-as-bid peer-to-peer energy trading: A comparison
title_short Network cost allocation methods for pay-as-bid peer-to-peer energy trading: A comparison
title_sort network cost allocation methods for pay as bid peer to peer energy trading a comparison
topic Peer-to-peer energy trading
Pay-as-bid
Network cost allocation
Network usage cost
Evaluation framework
url http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S235248472202340X
work_keys_str_mv AT noorfatiman networkcostallocationmethodsforpayasbidpeertopeerenergytradingacomparison
AT choiy networkcostallocationmethodsforpayasbidpeertopeerenergytradingacomparison
AT onena networkcostallocationmethodsforpayasbidpeertopeerenergytradingacomparison
AT jungj networkcostallocationmethodsforpayasbidpeertopeerenergytradingacomparison