Set-based design: a review and new directions
Set-based design (SBD), sometimes referred to as set-based concurrent engineering (SBCE), has emerged as an important component of lean product development (LPD) with all researchers describing it as a core enabler of LPD. Research has explored the principles underlying LPD and SBCE, but methodologi...
| Main Authors: | , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Cambridge University Press
2020-01-01
|
| Series: | Design Science |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S2053470120000165/type/journal_article |
| _version_ | 1811156444859334656 |
|---|---|
| author | Boris Toche Robert Pellerin Clement Fortin |
| author_facet | Boris Toche Robert Pellerin Clement Fortin |
| author_sort | Boris Toche |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | Set-based design (SBD), sometimes referred to as set-based concurrent engineering (SBCE), has emerged as an important component of lean product development (LPD) with all researchers describing it as a core enabler of LPD. Research has explored the principles underlying LPD and SBCE, but methodologies for the practical implementation need to be better understood. A review of SBD is performed in this article in order to discover and analyse the key aspects to consider when developing a model and methodology to transition to SBCE. The publications are classified according to a new framework, which allows us to map the topology of the relevant SBD literature from two perspectives: the research paradigms and the coverage of the generic creative design process (Formulation–Synthesis–Analysis–Evaluation–Documentation–Reformulation). It is found that SBD has a relatively low theoretical development, but there is a steady increase in the diversity of contributions. The literature abounds with methods, guidelines and tools to implement SBCE, but they rarely rely on a model that is in the continuum of a design process model, product model or knowledge-based model with the aim of federating the three Ps (People–Product–Process) towards SBCE and LPD in traditional industrial contexts. |
| first_indexed | 2024-04-10T04:51:42Z |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj.art-8fb948bb754c470783df45e508b27c2e |
| institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
| issn | 2053-4701 |
| language | English |
| last_indexed | 2024-04-10T04:51:42Z |
| publishDate | 2020-01-01 |
| publisher | Cambridge University Press |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Design Science |
| spelling | doaj.art-8fb948bb754c470783df45e508b27c2e2023-03-09T12:32:01ZengCambridge University PressDesign Science2053-47012020-01-01610.1017/dsj.2020.16Set-based design: a review and new directionsBoris Toche0https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7636-9379Robert Pellerin1Clement Fortin2https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9761-3107Polytechnique Montreal, Department of Mechanical Engineering, Montreal, CanadaPolytechnique Montreal, Department of Mathematics and Industrial Engineering, Montreal, CanadaSkolkovo Institute of Science and Technology, Moscow, RussiaSet-based design (SBD), sometimes referred to as set-based concurrent engineering (SBCE), has emerged as an important component of lean product development (LPD) with all researchers describing it as a core enabler of LPD. Research has explored the principles underlying LPD and SBCE, but methodologies for the practical implementation need to be better understood. A review of SBD is performed in this article in order to discover and analyse the key aspects to consider when developing a model and methodology to transition to SBCE. The publications are classified according to a new framework, which allows us to map the topology of the relevant SBD literature from two perspectives: the research paradigms and the coverage of the generic creative design process (Formulation–Synthesis–Analysis–Evaluation–Documentation–Reformulation). It is found that SBD has a relatively low theoretical development, but there is a steady increase in the diversity of contributions. The literature abounds with methods, guidelines and tools to implement SBCE, but they rarely rely on a model that is in the continuum of a design process model, product model or knowledge-based model with the aim of federating the three Ps (People–Product–Process) towards SBCE and LPD in traditional industrial contexts.https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S2053470120000165/type/journal_articledesign researchproduct developmentlean product developmentconcurrent engineeringset-based concurrent engineeringset-based design |
| spellingShingle | Boris Toche Robert Pellerin Clement Fortin Set-based design: a review and new directions Design Science design research product development lean product development concurrent engineering set-based concurrent engineering set-based design |
| title | Set-based design: a review and new directions |
| title_full | Set-based design: a review and new directions |
| title_fullStr | Set-based design: a review and new directions |
| title_full_unstemmed | Set-based design: a review and new directions |
| title_short | Set-based design: a review and new directions |
| title_sort | set based design a review and new directions |
| topic | design research product development lean product development concurrent engineering set-based concurrent engineering set-based design |
| url | https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S2053470120000165/type/journal_article |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT boristoche setbaseddesignareviewandnewdirections AT robertpellerin setbaseddesignareviewandnewdirections AT clementfortin setbaseddesignareviewandnewdirections |