Does size matter? Outcomes following revision total hip arthroplasty with long or primary stems: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Abstract Background Femoral reconstruction with long stems is widely accepted as the standard in revision total hip arthroplasty (rTHA). However, long stems can be technically challenging to insert and can compromise bone stock for future revision. This study aimed to identify whether there was a di...
Main Authors: | Rajpreet Sahemey, Ali Ridha, Alastair Stephens, Muhamed M. Farhan-Alanie, Jakub Kozdryk, Bryan Riemer, Pedro Foguet |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
BMC
2024-01-01
|
Series: | Arthroplasty |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.1186/s42836-023-00228-w |
Similar Items
-
An Alternative Solution to Achieve Primary Stability in Cementless Revision Hip Arthroplasty for Femur Ectasia
by: En-Rung Chiang, et al.
Published: (2010-12-01) -
What Has Changed in the Structure of Revision Hip Arthroplasty?
by: I. I. Shubnyakov, et al.
Published: (2019-12-01) -
Total femur arthroplasty for revision hip failure in osteogenesis imperfecta: limits of biology
by: Pablo Sanz-Ruiz, PhD, MD, et al.
Published: (2017-09-01) -
Clinical and Radiographic Outcomes of Hip Revision Surgery and Cerclage Wires Fixation for Vancouver B2 and B3 Fractures: A Retrospective Cohort Study
by: Vincenzo Di Matteo, et al.
Published: (2024-02-01) -
The Epidemiology of Hip and Knee Primary and Revision Arthroplasties during the COVID-19 Pandemic
by: Krystian Kazubski, et al.
Published: (2021-04-01)