Development of a complex intervention for people with chronic pain after knee replacement: the STAR care pathway

Abstract Background Approximately 20% of people who have total knee replacement experience chronic pain afterwards, but there is little evidence about effective interventions for managing this type of pain. This article describes the systematic development and refinement of a complex intervention fo...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Vikki Wylde, Nicholas Howells, Wendy Bertram, Andrew J. Moore, Julie Bruce, Candy McCabe, Ashley W. Blom, Jane Dennis, Amanda Burston, Rachael Gooberman-Hill
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2018-01-01
Series:Trials
Subjects:
Online Access:http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s13063-017-2391-8
_version_ 1811274166517628928
author Vikki Wylde
Nicholas Howells
Wendy Bertram
Andrew J. Moore
Julie Bruce
Candy McCabe
Ashley W. Blom
Jane Dennis
Amanda Burston
Rachael Gooberman-Hill
author_facet Vikki Wylde
Nicholas Howells
Wendy Bertram
Andrew J. Moore
Julie Bruce
Candy McCabe
Ashley W. Blom
Jane Dennis
Amanda Burston
Rachael Gooberman-Hill
author_sort Vikki Wylde
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Background Approximately 20% of people who have total knee replacement experience chronic pain afterwards, but there is little evidence about effective interventions for managing this type of pain. This article describes the systematic development and refinement of a complex intervention for people with chronic pain after knee replacement. The intervention is a care pathway involving an assessment clinic and onward referral, with telephone follow-up as required. In the design of this multistage study, we chose to focus on ensuring that the intervention was deliverable, implementable and acceptable. Methods In line with the UK Medical Research Council’s recommendations for comprehensive development of complex interventions, multiple phases of work were undertaken. Following on from initial development work to design the intervention, the draft intervention content was refined through consensus questionnaires with 22 health professionals and discussion at meetings with 18 healthcare professionals. Testing of intervention delivery and acceptability to patients was undertaken by two health professionals delivering the assessment clinic to ten patients. Views about future implementation within the context of a randomised trial were evaluated through a questionnaire based on the Normalisation Measure Development (NoMAD) instrument with ten health professional stakeholders. Results Consensus work with health professionals ensured the components of the intervention were appropriate and informed a number of substantive changes to improve the intervention. Testing of intervention delivery identified a number of logistical issues that were then addressed in the development of a comprehensive intervention training manual. Engagement with stakeholders indicated that the intervention could be successfully implemented in a clinical setting for evaluation in a randomised trial. Conclusions This work has informed the development and refinement of a complex intervention for people with chronic pain after knee replacement. The next stage is to evaluate the clinical and cost-effectiveness of the STAR care pathway in a multicentre randomised trial.
first_indexed 2024-04-12T23:14:06Z
format Article
id doaj.art-8fc4fcd00709455c9c88e42746f235aa
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1745-6215
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-12T23:14:06Z
publishDate 2018-01-01
publisher BMC
record_format Article
series Trials
spelling doaj.art-8fc4fcd00709455c9c88e42746f235aa2022-12-22T03:12:44ZengBMCTrials1745-62152018-01-011911910.1186/s13063-017-2391-8Development of a complex intervention for people with chronic pain after knee replacement: the STAR care pathwayVikki Wylde0Nicholas Howells1Wendy Bertram2Andrew J. Moore3Julie Bruce4Candy McCabe5Ashley W. Blom6Jane Dennis7Amanda Burston8Rachael Gooberman-Hill9Musculoskeletal Research Unit, Translational Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Learning and Research Building, Southmead HospitalNorth Bristol NHS Trust, Brunel Building, Southmead HospitalMusculoskeletal Research Unit, Translational Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Learning and Research Building, Southmead HospitalMusculoskeletal Research Unit, Translational Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Learning and Research Building, Southmead HospitalWarwick Clinical Trials Unit, Warwick Medical School, University of WarwickDepartment of Nursing and Midwifery, Faculty of Health and Applied Sciences, University of the West of EnglandMusculoskeletal Research Unit, Translational Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Learning and Research Building, Southmead HospitalMusculoskeletal Research Unit, Translational Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Learning and Research Building, Southmead HospitalMusculoskeletal Research Unit, Translational Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Learning and Research Building, Southmead HospitalMusculoskeletal Research Unit, Translational Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Learning and Research Building, Southmead HospitalAbstract Background Approximately 20% of people who have total knee replacement experience chronic pain afterwards, but there is little evidence about effective interventions for managing this type of pain. This article describes the systematic development and refinement of a complex intervention for people with chronic pain after knee replacement. The intervention is a care pathway involving an assessment clinic and onward referral, with telephone follow-up as required. In the design of this multistage study, we chose to focus on ensuring that the intervention was deliverable, implementable and acceptable. Methods In line with the UK Medical Research Council’s recommendations for comprehensive development of complex interventions, multiple phases of work were undertaken. Following on from initial development work to design the intervention, the draft intervention content was refined through consensus questionnaires with 22 health professionals and discussion at meetings with 18 healthcare professionals. Testing of intervention delivery and acceptability to patients was undertaken by two health professionals delivering the assessment clinic to ten patients. Views about future implementation within the context of a randomised trial were evaluated through a questionnaire based on the Normalisation Measure Development (NoMAD) instrument with ten health professional stakeholders. Results Consensus work with health professionals ensured the components of the intervention were appropriate and informed a number of substantive changes to improve the intervention. Testing of intervention delivery identified a number of logistical issues that were then addressed in the development of a comprehensive intervention training manual. Engagement with stakeholders indicated that the intervention could be successfully implemented in a clinical setting for evaluation in a randomised trial. Conclusions This work has informed the development and refinement of a complex intervention for people with chronic pain after knee replacement. The next stage is to evaluate the clinical and cost-effectiveness of the STAR care pathway in a multicentre randomised trial.http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s13063-017-2391-8Total knee replacementChronic painComplex intervention development
spellingShingle Vikki Wylde
Nicholas Howells
Wendy Bertram
Andrew J. Moore
Julie Bruce
Candy McCabe
Ashley W. Blom
Jane Dennis
Amanda Burston
Rachael Gooberman-Hill
Development of a complex intervention for people with chronic pain after knee replacement: the STAR care pathway
Trials
Total knee replacement
Chronic pain
Complex intervention development
title Development of a complex intervention for people with chronic pain after knee replacement: the STAR care pathway
title_full Development of a complex intervention for people with chronic pain after knee replacement: the STAR care pathway
title_fullStr Development of a complex intervention for people with chronic pain after knee replacement: the STAR care pathway
title_full_unstemmed Development of a complex intervention for people with chronic pain after knee replacement: the STAR care pathway
title_short Development of a complex intervention for people with chronic pain after knee replacement: the STAR care pathway
title_sort development of a complex intervention for people with chronic pain after knee replacement the star care pathway
topic Total knee replacement
Chronic pain
Complex intervention development
url http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s13063-017-2391-8
work_keys_str_mv AT vikkiwylde developmentofacomplexinterventionforpeoplewithchronicpainafterkneereplacementthestarcarepathway
AT nicholashowells developmentofacomplexinterventionforpeoplewithchronicpainafterkneereplacementthestarcarepathway
AT wendybertram developmentofacomplexinterventionforpeoplewithchronicpainafterkneereplacementthestarcarepathway
AT andrewjmoore developmentofacomplexinterventionforpeoplewithchronicpainafterkneereplacementthestarcarepathway
AT juliebruce developmentofacomplexinterventionforpeoplewithchronicpainafterkneereplacementthestarcarepathway
AT candymccabe developmentofacomplexinterventionforpeoplewithchronicpainafterkneereplacementthestarcarepathway
AT ashleywblom developmentofacomplexinterventionforpeoplewithchronicpainafterkneereplacementthestarcarepathway
AT janedennis developmentofacomplexinterventionforpeoplewithchronicpainafterkneereplacementthestarcarepathway
AT amandaburston developmentofacomplexinterventionforpeoplewithchronicpainafterkneereplacementthestarcarepathway
AT rachaelgoobermanhill developmentofacomplexinterventionforpeoplewithchronicpainafterkneereplacementthestarcarepathway