A Comparison of Dynamic Strength Index between Team-Sport Athletes
The purpose of this study was to examine the differences in countermovement jump peak force (CMJ-PF), isometric mid-thigh pull peak force (IMTP-PF), and resultant dynamic strength index (DSI) values between team-sport athletes. One hundred and fifteen male and female team-sport athletes performed th...
Main Authors: | , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
MDPI AG
2017-09-01
|
Series: | Sports |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://www.mdpi.com/2075-4663/5/3/71 |
_version_ | 1798005773343653888 |
---|---|
author | Christopher Thomas Thomas Dos’Santos Paul A. Jones |
author_facet | Christopher Thomas Thomas Dos’Santos Paul A. Jones |
author_sort | Christopher Thomas |
collection | DOAJ |
description | The purpose of this study was to examine the differences in countermovement jump peak force (CMJ-PF), isometric mid-thigh pull peak force (IMTP-PF), and resultant dynamic strength index (DSI) values between team-sport athletes. One hundred and fifteen male and female team-sport athletes performed the CMJ and IMTP to determine peak force (CMJ-PF and IMTP-PF, respectively). Statistically and practically significant differences (p ≤ 0.050; d = 0.49–1.32) in CMJ-PF were evident between teams. Specifically, the greatest CMJ-PFs were produced by the male cricket players and were followed in order by the male basketball, male soccer, female netball, female cricket, and female soccer players. Statistically and practically significant differences (p ≤ 0.045; d = 0.64–1.78) in IMTP-PF existed among sports teams, with the greatest IMTP-PFs were produced by the male soccer players and were followed in order by the male cricket, male basketball, female netball, female soccer, and female cricket players. Statistically and practically significant differences (p ≤ 0.050; d = 0.92–1.44) in DSI were found between teams. These findings demonstrate that CMJ-PF, IMTP-PF, and DSI differ between sports teams and provide normative data for ballistic and isometric PF measures. Strength and conditioning coaches should consider relative changes in CMJ-PF and IMTP-PF when assessing DSI ratios. |
first_indexed | 2024-04-11T12:45:13Z |
format | Article |
id | doaj.art-8fcdc03438854f2c985f403a9e118270 |
institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
issn | 2075-4663 |
language | English |
last_indexed | 2024-04-11T12:45:13Z |
publishDate | 2017-09-01 |
publisher | MDPI AG |
record_format | Article |
series | Sports |
spelling | doaj.art-8fcdc03438854f2c985f403a9e1182702022-12-22T04:23:23ZengMDPI AGSports2075-46632017-09-01537110.3390/sports5030071sports5030071A Comparison of Dynamic Strength Index between Team-Sport AthletesChristopher Thomas0Thomas Dos’Santos1Paul A. Jones2Directorate of Sport, Exercise and Physiotherapy, University of Salford, Greater Manchester M6 6PU, UKDirectorate of Sport, Exercise and Physiotherapy, University of Salford, Greater Manchester M6 6PU, UKDirectorate of Sport, Exercise and Physiotherapy, University of Salford, Greater Manchester M6 6PU, UKThe purpose of this study was to examine the differences in countermovement jump peak force (CMJ-PF), isometric mid-thigh pull peak force (IMTP-PF), and resultant dynamic strength index (DSI) values between team-sport athletes. One hundred and fifteen male and female team-sport athletes performed the CMJ and IMTP to determine peak force (CMJ-PF and IMTP-PF, respectively). Statistically and practically significant differences (p ≤ 0.050; d = 0.49–1.32) in CMJ-PF were evident between teams. Specifically, the greatest CMJ-PFs were produced by the male cricket players and were followed in order by the male basketball, male soccer, female netball, female cricket, and female soccer players. Statistically and practically significant differences (p ≤ 0.045; d = 0.64–1.78) in IMTP-PF existed among sports teams, with the greatest IMTP-PFs were produced by the male soccer players and were followed in order by the male cricket, male basketball, female netball, female soccer, and female cricket players. Statistically and practically significant differences (p ≤ 0.050; d = 0.92–1.44) in DSI were found between teams. These findings demonstrate that CMJ-PF, IMTP-PF, and DSI differ between sports teams and provide normative data for ballistic and isometric PF measures. Strength and conditioning coaches should consider relative changes in CMJ-PF and IMTP-PF when assessing DSI ratios.https://www.mdpi.com/2075-4663/5/3/71peak forcecountermovement jumpisometric mid-thigh pullstrength assessment |
spellingShingle | Christopher Thomas Thomas Dos’Santos Paul A. Jones A Comparison of Dynamic Strength Index between Team-Sport Athletes Sports peak force countermovement jump isometric mid-thigh pull strength assessment |
title | A Comparison of Dynamic Strength Index between Team-Sport Athletes |
title_full | A Comparison of Dynamic Strength Index between Team-Sport Athletes |
title_fullStr | A Comparison of Dynamic Strength Index between Team-Sport Athletes |
title_full_unstemmed | A Comparison of Dynamic Strength Index between Team-Sport Athletes |
title_short | A Comparison of Dynamic Strength Index between Team-Sport Athletes |
title_sort | comparison of dynamic strength index between team sport athletes |
topic | peak force countermovement jump isometric mid-thigh pull strength assessment |
url | https://www.mdpi.com/2075-4663/5/3/71 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT christopherthomas acomparisonofdynamicstrengthindexbetweenteamsportathletes AT thomasdossantos acomparisonofdynamicstrengthindexbetweenteamsportathletes AT paulajones acomparisonofdynamicstrengthindexbetweenteamsportathletes AT christopherthomas comparisonofdynamicstrengthindexbetweenteamsportathletes AT thomasdossantos comparisonofdynamicstrengthindexbetweenteamsportathletes AT paulajones comparisonofdynamicstrengthindexbetweenteamsportathletes |