Comparison of perioperative analgesia using the infiltration of the surgical site with ropivacaine alone and in combination with meloxicam in cats undergoing ovariohysterectomy

Abstract Background Infiltration of the surgical site with local anesthetics combined with nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs may play an important role in improving perioperative pain control. This prospective, randomized, blinded, controlled clinical trial aimed to evaluate intraoperative isoflu...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Gabriel de O.L. Carapeba, Isabela P. G. A. Nicácio, Ana Beatriz F. Stelle, Tatiane S. Bruno, Gabriel M. Nicácio, José S. Costa Júnior, Rogerio Giuffrida, Francisco J. Teixeira Neto, Renata N. Cassu
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2020-03-01
Series:BMC Veterinary Research
Subjects:
Online Access:http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12917-020-02303-9
_version_ 1818035530360684544
author Gabriel de O.L. Carapeba
Isabela P. G. A. Nicácio
Ana Beatriz F. Stelle
Tatiane S. Bruno
Gabriel M. Nicácio
José S. Costa Júnior
Rogerio Giuffrida
Francisco J. Teixeira Neto
Renata N. Cassu
author_facet Gabriel de O.L. Carapeba
Isabela P. G. A. Nicácio
Ana Beatriz F. Stelle
Tatiane S. Bruno
Gabriel M. Nicácio
José S. Costa Júnior
Rogerio Giuffrida
Francisco J. Teixeira Neto
Renata N. Cassu
author_sort Gabriel de O.L. Carapeba
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Background Infiltration of the surgical site with local anesthetics combined with nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs may play an important role in improving perioperative pain control. This prospective, randomized, blinded, controlled clinical trial aimed to evaluate intraoperative isoflurane requirements, postoperative analgesia, and adverse events of infiltration of the surgical site with ropivacaine alone and combined with meloxicam in cats undergoing ovariohysterectomy. Forty-five cats premedicated with acepromazine/meperidine and anesthetized with propofol/isoflurane were randomly distributed into three treatments (n = 15 per group): physiological saline (group S), ropivacaine alone (1 mg/kg, group R) or combined with meloxicam (0.2 mg/kg, group RM) infiltrated at the surgical site (incision line, ovarian pedicles and uterus). End-tidal isoflurane concentration (FE’ISO), recorded at specific time points during surgery, was adjusted to inhibit autonomic responses to surgical stimulation. Pain was assessed using an Interactive Visual Analog Scale (IVAS), UNESP-Botucatu Multidimensional Composite Pain Scale (MCPS), and mechanical nociceptive thresholds (MNT) up to 24 h post-extubation. Rescue analgesia was provided with intramuscular morphine (0.1 mg/kg) when MCPS was ≥6. Results Area under the curve (AUC) of FE’ISO was significantly lower (P < 0.0001) in the RM (17.8 ± 3.1) compared to S (23.1 ± 2.2) and R groups (22.8 ± 1.1). Hypertension (systolic arterial pressure > 160 mmHg) coinciding with surgical manipulation was observed only in cats treated with S and R (4/15 cats, P = 0.08). The number of cats receiving rescue analgesia (4 cats in the S group and 1 cat in the R and RM groups) did not differ among groups (P = 0.17). The AUC of IVAS, MCPS and MNT did not differ among groups (P = 0.56, 0.64, and 0.18, respectively). Significantly lower IVAS pain scores were recorded at 1 h in the RM compared to the R and S groups (P = 0.021–0.018). There were no significant adverse effects during the study period. Conclusions Local infiltration with RM decreased intraoperative isoflurane requirements and resulted in some evidence of improved analgesia during the early postoperative period. Neither R nor RM infiltration appeared to result in long term analgesia in cats undergoing ovariohysterectomy.
first_indexed 2024-12-10T06:56:31Z
format Article
id doaj.art-8ffd881c77014278ba90d5b59758e3d4
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1746-6148
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-10T06:56:31Z
publishDate 2020-03-01
publisher BMC
record_format Article
series BMC Veterinary Research
spelling doaj.art-8ffd881c77014278ba90d5b59758e3d42022-12-22T01:58:25ZengBMCBMC Veterinary Research1746-61482020-03-0116111010.1186/s12917-020-02303-9Comparison of perioperative analgesia using the infiltration of the surgical site with ropivacaine alone and in combination with meloxicam in cats undergoing ovariohysterectomyGabriel de O.L. Carapeba0Isabela P. G. A. Nicácio1Ana Beatriz F. Stelle2Tatiane S. Bruno3Gabriel M. Nicácio4José S. Costa Júnior5Rogerio Giuffrida6Francisco J. Teixeira Neto7Renata N. Cassu8Postgraduate Program in Animal Science, Universidade do Oeste Paulista (UNOESTE)Postgraduate Program in Animal Science, Universidade do Oeste Paulista (UNOESTE)Department of Veterinary Surgery and Anesthesiology, Faculdade de Medicina Veterinária, Universidade do Oeste Paulista (UNOESTE)Department of Veterinary Surgery and Anesthesiology, Faculdade de Medicina Veterinária, Universidade do Oeste Paulista (UNOESTE)Department of Veterinary Surgery and Anesthesiology, Faculdade de Medicina Veterinária, Universidade do Oeste Paulista (UNOESTE)Department of Veterinary Surgery and Anesthesiology, Faculdade de Medicina Veterinária, Universidade do Oeste Paulista (UNOESTE)Postgraduate Program in Animal Science, Universidade do Oeste Paulista (UNOESTE)Department of Veterinary Surgery and Animal Reproduction, Faculdade de Medicina Veterinária e Zootecnia, Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)Postgraduate Program in Animal Science, Universidade do Oeste Paulista (UNOESTE)Abstract Background Infiltration of the surgical site with local anesthetics combined with nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs may play an important role in improving perioperative pain control. This prospective, randomized, blinded, controlled clinical trial aimed to evaluate intraoperative isoflurane requirements, postoperative analgesia, and adverse events of infiltration of the surgical site with ropivacaine alone and combined with meloxicam in cats undergoing ovariohysterectomy. Forty-five cats premedicated with acepromazine/meperidine and anesthetized with propofol/isoflurane were randomly distributed into three treatments (n = 15 per group): physiological saline (group S), ropivacaine alone (1 mg/kg, group R) or combined with meloxicam (0.2 mg/kg, group RM) infiltrated at the surgical site (incision line, ovarian pedicles and uterus). End-tidal isoflurane concentration (FE’ISO), recorded at specific time points during surgery, was adjusted to inhibit autonomic responses to surgical stimulation. Pain was assessed using an Interactive Visual Analog Scale (IVAS), UNESP-Botucatu Multidimensional Composite Pain Scale (MCPS), and mechanical nociceptive thresholds (MNT) up to 24 h post-extubation. Rescue analgesia was provided with intramuscular morphine (0.1 mg/kg) when MCPS was ≥6. Results Area under the curve (AUC) of FE’ISO was significantly lower (P < 0.0001) in the RM (17.8 ± 3.1) compared to S (23.1 ± 2.2) and R groups (22.8 ± 1.1). Hypertension (systolic arterial pressure > 160 mmHg) coinciding with surgical manipulation was observed only in cats treated with S and R (4/15 cats, P = 0.08). The number of cats receiving rescue analgesia (4 cats in the S group and 1 cat in the R and RM groups) did not differ among groups (P = 0.17). The AUC of IVAS, MCPS and MNT did not differ among groups (P = 0.56, 0.64, and 0.18, respectively). Significantly lower IVAS pain scores were recorded at 1 h in the RM compared to the R and S groups (P = 0.021–0.018). There were no significant adverse effects during the study period. Conclusions Local infiltration with RM decreased intraoperative isoflurane requirements and resulted in some evidence of improved analgesia during the early postoperative period. Neither R nor RM infiltration appeared to result in long term analgesia in cats undergoing ovariohysterectomy.http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12917-020-02303-9AnalgesiaFelineInfiltrationLocal anestheticNon-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug
spellingShingle Gabriel de O.L. Carapeba
Isabela P. G. A. Nicácio
Ana Beatriz F. Stelle
Tatiane S. Bruno
Gabriel M. Nicácio
José S. Costa Júnior
Rogerio Giuffrida
Francisco J. Teixeira Neto
Renata N. Cassu
Comparison of perioperative analgesia using the infiltration of the surgical site with ropivacaine alone and in combination with meloxicam in cats undergoing ovariohysterectomy
BMC Veterinary Research
Analgesia
Feline
Infiltration
Local anesthetic
Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug
title Comparison of perioperative analgesia using the infiltration of the surgical site with ropivacaine alone and in combination with meloxicam in cats undergoing ovariohysterectomy
title_full Comparison of perioperative analgesia using the infiltration of the surgical site with ropivacaine alone and in combination with meloxicam in cats undergoing ovariohysterectomy
title_fullStr Comparison of perioperative analgesia using the infiltration of the surgical site with ropivacaine alone and in combination with meloxicam in cats undergoing ovariohysterectomy
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of perioperative analgesia using the infiltration of the surgical site with ropivacaine alone and in combination with meloxicam in cats undergoing ovariohysterectomy
title_short Comparison of perioperative analgesia using the infiltration of the surgical site with ropivacaine alone and in combination with meloxicam in cats undergoing ovariohysterectomy
title_sort comparison of perioperative analgesia using the infiltration of the surgical site with ropivacaine alone and in combination with meloxicam in cats undergoing ovariohysterectomy
topic Analgesia
Feline
Infiltration
Local anesthetic
Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug
url http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12917-020-02303-9
work_keys_str_mv AT gabrieldeolcarapeba comparisonofperioperativeanalgesiausingtheinfiltrationofthesurgicalsitewithropivacainealoneandincombinationwithmeloxicamincatsundergoingovariohysterectomy
AT isabelapganicacio comparisonofperioperativeanalgesiausingtheinfiltrationofthesurgicalsitewithropivacainealoneandincombinationwithmeloxicamincatsundergoingovariohysterectomy
AT anabeatrizfstelle comparisonofperioperativeanalgesiausingtheinfiltrationofthesurgicalsitewithropivacainealoneandincombinationwithmeloxicamincatsundergoingovariohysterectomy
AT tatianesbruno comparisonofperioperativeanalgesiausingtheinfiltrationofthesurgicalsitewithropivacainealoneandincombinationwithmeloxicamincatsundergoingovariohysterectomy
AT gabrielmnicacio comparisonofperioperativeanalgesiausingtheinfiltrationofthesurgicalsitewithropivacainealoneandincombinationwithmeloxicamincatsundergoingovariohysterectomy
AT josescostajunior comparisonofperioperativeanalgesiausingtheinfiltrationofthesurgicalsitewithropivacainealoneandincombinationwithmeloxicamincatsundergoingovariohysterectomy
AT rogeriogiuffrida comparisonofperioperativeanalgesiausingtheinfiltrationofthesurgicalsitewithropivacainealoneandincombinationwithmeloxicamincatsundergoingovariohysterectomy
AT franciscojteixeiraneto comparisonofperioperativeanalgesiausingtheinfiltrationofthesurgicalsitewithropivacainealoneandincombinationwithmeloxicamincatsundergoingovariohysterectomy
AT renatancassu comparisonofperioperativeanalgesiausingtheinfiltrationofthesurgicalsitewithropivacainealoneandincombinationwithmeloxicamincatsundergoingovariohysterectomy