Combined oral contraceptives with shortened hormone-free interval. Proven advantages of the therapy regime
Objective: To determine the benefits of COC in the 26/2 mode compared with the traditional 21/7 in reducing the frequency of side effects. Main provisions. Side effects – the main cause of women’s refusals to take COCs – occur predominantly on days of taking pills without hormones due to a drop in e...
Main Author: | G. B. Dikke |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | Russian |
Published: |
Remedium Group LLC
2019-10-01
|
Series: | Медицинский совет |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://www.med-sovet.pro/jour/article/view/3900 |
Similar Items
-
Contraception with estradiol valerate and dienogest: adherence to the method
by: Fruzzetti F, et al.
Published: (2019-05-01) -
Continuation rates, bleeding profile acceptability, and satisfaction of women using an oral contraceptive pill containing estradiol valerate and dienogest versus a progestogen-only pill after switching from an ethinylestradiol-containing pill in a real-life setting: results of the CONTENT study
by: Briggs P, et al.
Published: (2016-09-01) -
Estradiol valerate and dienogest in hormonal contraception. Acceptability and effectiveness in real clinical practice
by: E. R. Dovletkhanova, et al.
Published: (2018-09-01) -
Real clinical practice and contraception for young women with children
by: Natalia V. Aganezova, et al.
Published: (2021-03-01) -
Contraception modes: increasing women’s commitment to modern combined oral contraceptives with the shortest possible hormone-free interval
by: Elena N. Andreeva, et al.
Published: (2020-05-01)