Effectiveness and safety of endoscopic submucosal dissection using the pocket creation method in the Japanese population: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Background and study aims Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) is a standard method for minimally invasive resection of superficial gastrointestinal tumors. The pocket creation method (PCM) facilitates ESD regardless of location in the gastrointestinal tract. The aim of this systematic review and...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Satoshi Shinozaki, Yoshikazu Hayashi, Yoshimasa Miura, Tomonori Yano, Alan Kawarai Lefor, Hironori Yamamoto
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Georg Thieme Verlag KG 2022-05-01
Series:Endoscopy International Open
Online Access:http://www.thieme-connect.de/DOI/DOI?10.1055/a-1789-0548
_version_ 1811233107045515264
author Satoshi Shinozaki
Yoshikazu Hayashi
Yoshimasa Miura
Tomonori Yano
Alan Kawarai Lefor
Hironori Yamamoto
author_facet Satoshi Shinozaki
Yoshikazu Hayashi
Yoshimasa Miura
Tomonori Yano
Alan Kawarai Lefor
Hironori Yamamoto
author_sort Satoshi Shinozaki
collection DOAJ
description Background and study aims Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) is a standard method for minimally invasive resection of superficial gastrointestinal tumors. The pocket creation method (PCM) facilitates ESD regardless of location in the gastrointestinal tract. The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis is to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of ESD for superficial neoplasms in the upper and lower gastrointestinal tract comparing the PCM to the non-PCM. Methods Randomized controlled, prospective, and retrospective studies comparing the PCM with the non-PCM were included. Outcomes included en bloc resection, R0 resection, dissection speed, delayed bleeding and perforation. Pooled odds ratios (ORs) with 95 % confidence intervals (CIs) using the Mantel-Haenszel random effect model were documented. Results Eight studies including gastric, duodenal, and colorectal ESD were included. The en bloc resection rate was significantly higher in the PCM group than the non-PCM group (OR 3.87, 95 %CI 1.24–12.10 P = 0.020). The R0 resection rate was significantly higher in the PCM group than the non-PCM group (OR 2.46, 95 %CI 1.14–5.30, P = 0.020). The dissection speed was significantly faster in the PCM group than the non-PCM group (mean difference 3.13, 95 % CI 1.35–4.91, P < 0.001). The rate of delayed bleeding was similar in the two groups (OR 1.13, 95 %CI 0.60–2.15, P = 0.700). The rate of perforation was significantly lower in the PCM group than the non-PCM group (OR 0.34, 95 %CI 0.15–0.76, P = 0.009). Conclusions The PCM facilitates high-quality, fast and safe colorectal ESD. Further studies are needed regarding the utility of PCM in ESD of the upper gastrointestinal tract.
first_indexed 2024-04-12T11:14:50Z
format Article
id doaj.art-901c055b8b7640cd96c78e1ac763f8b4
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2364-3722
2196-9736
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-12T11:14:50Z
publishDate 2022-05-01
publisher Georg Thieme Verlag KG
record_format Article
series Endoscopy International Open
spelling doaj.art-901c055b8b7640cd96c78e1ac763f8b42022-12-22T03:35:31ZengGeorg Thieme Verlag KGEndoscopy International Open2364-37222196-97362022-05-011005E694E70210.1055/a-1789-0548Effectiveness and safety of endoscopic submucosal dissection using the pocket creation method in the Japanese population: a systematic review and meta-analysisSatoshi Shinozaki0Yoshikazu Hayashi1Yoshimasa Miura2Tomonori Yano3Alan Kawarai Lefor4Hironori Yamamoto5Shinozaki Medical Clinic, Utsunomiya, JapanDepartment of Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology, Jichi Medical University, Shimotsuke, JapanDepartment of Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology, Jichi Medical University, Shimotsuke, JapanDepartment of Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology, Jichi Medical University, Shimotsuke, JapanDepartment of Surgery, Jichi Medical University, Shimotsuke, JapanDepartment of Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology, Jichi Medical University, Shimotsuke, JapanBackground and study aims Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) is a standard method for minimally invasive resection of superficial gastrointestinal tumors. The pocket creation method (PCM) facilitates ESD regardless of location in the gastrointestinal tract. The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis is to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of ESD for superficial neoplasms in the upper and lower gastrointestinal tract comparing the PCM to the non-PCM. Methods Randomized controlled, prospective, and retrospective studies comparing the PCM with the non-PCM were included. Outcomes included en bloc resection, R0 resection, dissection speed, delayed bleeding and perforation. Pooled odds ratios (ORs) with 95 % confidence intervals (CIs) using the Mantel-Haenszel random effect model were documented. Results Eight studies including gastric, duodenal, and colorectal ESD were included. The en bloc resection rate was significantly higher in the PCM group than the non-PCM group (OR 3.87, 95 %CI 1.24–12.10 P = 0.020). The R0 resection rate was significantly higher in the PCM group than the non-PCM group (OR 2.46, 95 %CI 1.14–5.30, P = 0.020). The dissection speed was significantly faster in the PCM group than the non-PCM group (mean difference 3.13, 95 % CI 1.35–4.91, P < 0.001). The rate of delayed bleeding was similar in the two groups (OR 1.13, 95 %CI 0.60–2.15, P = 0.700). The rate of perforation was significantly lower in the PCM group than the non-PCM group (OR 0.34, 95 %CI 0.15–0.76, P = 0.009). Conclusions The PCM facilitates high-quality, fast and safe colorectal ESD. Further studies are needed regarding the utility of PCM in ESD of the upper gastrointestinal tract.http://www.thieme-connect.de/DOI/DOI?10.1055/a-1789-0548
spellingShingle Satoshi Shinozaki
Yoshikazu Hayashi
Yoshimasa Miura
Tomonori Yano
Alan Kawarai Lefor
Hironori Yamamoto
Effectiveness and safety of endoscopic submucosal dissection using the pocket creation method in the Japanese population: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Endoscopy International Open
title Effectiveness and safety of endoscopic submucosal dissection using the pocket creation method in the Japanese population: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full Effectiveness and safety of endoscopic submucosal dissection using the pocket creation method in the Japanese population: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_fullStr Effectiveness and safety of endoscopic submucosal dissection using the pocket creation method in the Japanese population: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full_unstemmed Effectiveness and safety of endoscopic submucosal dissection using the pocket creation method in the Japanese population: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_short Effectiveness and safety of endoscopic submucosal dissection using the pocket creation method in the Japanese population: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_sort effectiveness and safety of endoscopic submucosal dissection using the pocket creation method in the japanese population a systematic review and meta analysis
url http://www.thieme-connect.de/DOI/DOI?10.1055/a-1789-0548
work_keys_str_mv AT satoshishinozaki effectivenessandsafetyofendoscopicsubmucosaldissectionusingthepocketcreationmethodinthejapanesepopulationasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT yoshikazuhayashi effectivenessandsafetyofendoscopicsubmucosaldissectionusingthepocketcreationmethodinthejapanesepopulationasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT yoshimasamiura effectivenessandsafetyofendoscopicsubmucosaldissectionusingthepocketcreationmethodinthejapanesepopulationasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT tomonoriyano effectivenessandsafetyofendoscopicsubmucosaldissectionusingthepocketcreationmethodinthejapanesepopulationasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT alankawarailefor effectivenessandsafetyofendoscopicsubmucosaldissectionusingthepocketcreationmethodinthejapanesepopulationasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT hironoriyamamoto effectivenessandsafetyofendoscopicsubmucosaldissectionusingthepocketcreationmethodinthejapanesepopulationasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis