Usefulness of Robotic Stereotactic Assistance (ROSAⓇ) Device for Stereoelectroencephalography Electrode Implantation: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

The aim of this study was to systematically review and meta-analyze the efficiency and safety of using the Robotic Stereotactic Assistance (ROSAⓇ) device (Zimmer Biomet; Warsaw, IN, USA) for stereoelectroencephalography (SEEG) electrode implantation in patients with drug-resistant epilepsy. Based on...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Anukoon KAEWBORISUTSAKUL, Mikhail CHERNOV, Suguru YOKOSAKO, Yuichi KUBOTA
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: The Japan Neurosurgical Society 2024-02-01
Series:Neurologia Medico-Chirurgica
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.jstage.jst.go.jp/article/nmc/64/2/64_2023-0119/_pdf/-char/en
_version_ 1797269120534708224
author Anukoon KAEWBORISUTSAKUL
Mikhail CHERNOV
Suguru YOKOSAKO
Yuichi KUBOTA
author_facet Anukoon KAEWBORISUTSAKUL
Mikhail CHERNOV
Suguru YOKOSAKO
Yuichi KUBOTA
author_sort Anukoon KAEWBORISUTSAKUL
collection DOAJ
description The aim of this study was to systematically review and meta-analyze the efficiency and safety of using the Robotic Stereotactic Assistance (ROSAⓇ) device (Zimmer Biomet; Warsaw, IN, USA) for stereoelectroencephalography (SEEG) electrode implantation in patients with drug-resistant epilepsy. Based on the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines, a literature search was carried out. Overall, 855 nonduplicate relevant articles were determined, and 15 of them were selected for analysis. The benefits of the ROSAⓇ device use in terms of electrode placement accuracy, as well as operative time length, perioperative complications, and seizure outcomes, were evaluated. Studies that were included reported on a total of 11,257 SEEG electrode implantations. The limited number of comparative studies hindered the comprehensive evaluation of the electrode implantation accuracy. Compared with frame-based or navigation-assisted techniques, ROSAⓇ-assisted SEEG electrode implantation provided significant benefits for reduction of both overall operative time (mean difference [MD], −63.45 min; 95% confidence interval [CI] from −88.73 to −38.17 min; P < 0.00001) and operative time per implanted electrode (MD, −8.79 min; 95% CI from −14.37 to −3.21 min; P = 0.002). No significant differences existed in perioperative complications and seizure outcomes after the application of the ROSAⓇ device and other techniques for electrode implantation. To conclude, the available evidence shows that the ROSAⓇ device is an effective and safe surgical tool for trajectory-guided SEEG electrode implantation in patients with drug-resistant epilepsy, offering benefits for saving operative time and neither increasing the risk of perioperative complications nor negatively impacting seizure outcomes.
first_indexed 2024-04-25T01:43:19Z
format Article
id doaj.art-901fd009c080465888a277e5bcd14b8c
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1349-8029
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-25T01:43:19Z
publishDate 2024-02-01
publisher The Japan Neurosurgical Society
record_format Article
series Neurologia Medico-Chirurgica
spelling doaj.art-901fd009c080465888a277e5bcd14b8c2024-03-08T00:46:57ZengThe Japan Neurosurgical SocietyNeurologia Medico-Chirurgica1349-80292024-02-01642718610.2176/jns-nmc.2023-01192023-0119Usefulness of Robotic Stereotactic Assistance (ROSAⓇ) Device for Stereoelectroencephalography Electrode Implantation: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysisAnukoon KAEWBORISUTSAKUL0Mikhail CHERNOV1Suguru YOKOSAKO2Yuichi KUBOTA3Neurological Surgery Unit, Division of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Prince of Songkla UniversityDepartment of Neurosurgery, Tokyo Women's Medical University Adachi Medical CenterDepartment of Neurosurgery, Tokyo Women's Medical University Adachi Medical CenterDepartment of Neurosurgery, Tokyo Women's Medical University Adachi Medical CenterThe aim of this study was to systematically review and meta-analyze the efficiency and safety of using the Robotic Stereotactic Assistance (ROSAⓇ) device (Zimmer Biomet; Warsaw, IN, USA) for stereoelectroencephalography (SEEG) electrode implantation in patients with drug-resistant epilepsy. Based on the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines, a literature search was carried out. Overall, 855 nonduplicate relevant articles were determined, and 15 of them were selected for analysis. The benefits of the ROSAⓇ device use in terms of electrode placement accuracy, as well as operative time length, perioperative complications, and seizure outcomes, were evaluated. Studies that were included reported on a total of 11,257 SEEG electrode implantations. The limited number of comparative studies hindered the comprehensive evaluation of the electrode implantation accuracy. Compared with frame-based or navigation-assisted techniques, ROSAⓇ-assisted SEEG electrode implantation provided significant benefits for reduction of both overall operative time (mean difference [MD], −63.45 min; 95% confidence interval [CI] from −88.73 to −38.17 min; P < 0.00001) and operative time per implanted electrode (MD, −8.79 min; 95% CI from −14.37 to −3.21 min; P = 0.002). No significant differences existed in perioperative complications and seizure outcomes after the application of the ROSAⓇ device and other techniques for electrode implantation. To conclude, the available evidence shows that the ROSAⓇ device is an effective and safe surgical tool for trajectory-guided SEEG electrode implantation in patients with drug-resistant epilepsy, offering benefits for saving operative time and neither increasing the risk of perioperative complications nor negatively impacting seizure outcomes.https://www.jstage.jst.go.jp/article/nmc/64/2/64_2023-0119/_pdf/-char/enepilepsystereoelectroencephalographydepth electrode implantationrobotic stereotactic assistance (rosaⓡ)efficacy
spellingShingle Anukoon KAEWBORISUTSAKUL
Mikhail CHERNOV
Suguru YOKOSAKO
Yuichi KUBOTA
Usefulness of Robotic Stereotactic Assistance (ROSAⓇ) Device for Stereoelectroencephalography Electrode Implantation: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
Neurologia Medico-Chirurgica
epilepsy
stereoelectroencephalography
depth electrode implantation
robotic stereotactic assistance (rosaⓡ)
efficacy
title Usefulness of Robotic Stereotactic Assistance (ROSAⓇ) Device for Stereoelectroencephalography Electrode Implantation: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
title_full Usefulness of Robotic Stereotactic Assistance (ROSAⓇ) Device for Stereoelectroencephalography Electrode Implantation: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
title_fullStr Usefulness of Robotic Stereotactic Assistance (ROSAⓇ) Device for Stereoelectroencephalography Electrode Implantation: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
title_full_unstemmed Usefulness of Robotic Stereotactic Assistance (ROSAⓇ) Device for Stereoelectroencephalography Electrode Implantation: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
title_short Usefulness of Robotic Stereotactic Assistance (ROSAⓇ) Device for Stereoelectroencephalography Electrode Implantation: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
title_sort usefulness of robotic stereotactic assistance rosaⓡ device for stereoelectroencephalography electrode implantation a systematic review and meta analysis
topic epilepsy
stereoelectroencephalography
depth electrode implantation
robotic stereotactic assistance (rosaⓡ)
efficacy
url https://www.jstage.jst.go.jp/article/nmc/64/2/64_2023-0119/_pdf/-char/en
work_keys_str_mv AT anukoonkaewborisutsakul usefulnessofroboticstereotacticassistancerosadeviceforstereoelectroencephalographyelectrodeimplantationasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT mikhailchernov usefulnessofroboticstereotacticassistancerosadeviceforstereoelectroencephalographyelectrodeimplantationasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT suguruyokosako usefulnessofroboticstereotacticassistancerosadeviceforstereoelectroencephalographyelectrodeimplantationasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT yuichikubota usefulnessofroboticstereotacticassistancerosadeviceforstereoelectroencephalographyelectrodeimplantationasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis