Pasión e identidad
In this paper, I attemp to clarify the controversial use of pathêmata tîs psuchês, made by Aristotle in De Anima and De Interpretatione, specially when he signifies the act of thinking (noein), thoughts (noemata) and knowledge in general. I defend the thesis that the term pathos is essential for Ari...
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | Spanish |
| Published: |
Universidad Panamericana
2013-11-01
|
| Series: | Tópicos |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | http://topicosojs.up.edu.mx/ojs/index.php/topicos/article/view/382 |
| _version_ | 1818771800259035136 |
|---|---|
| author | Jaime Araos San Martín |
| author_facet | Jaime Araos San Martín |
| author_sort | Jaime Araos San Martín |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | In this paper, I attemp to clarify the controversial use of pathêmata tîs psuchês, made by Aristotle in De Anima and De Interpretatione, specially when he signifies the act of thinking (noein), thoughts (noemata) and knowledge in general. I defend the thesis that the term pathos is essential for Aristotle's theory of knowledge. My argument is based upon the distinction, made by Aristotle in De Anima and Metaphysics, betwen two meanings of this term: (i) as movement to the other (alloiôsis), and (ii) as growth to the same (homoiôsis). I interpret the latter in connection with the act (energeia), and I state the senses in which it would be proper to predicate the passibility and the impassibility of the faculties of cognition, the things which are known, and knowledge itself as act. |
| first_indexed | 2024-12-18T09:59:13Z |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj.art-902adcedd75a410c9c01e0cd61e4fa81 |
| institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
| issn | 0188-6649 2007-8498 |
| language | Spanish |
| last_indexed | 2024-12-18T09:59:13Z |
| publishDate | 2013-11-01 |
| publisher | Universidad Panamericana |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Tópicos |
| spelling | doaj.art-902adcedd75a410c9c01e0cd61e4fa812022-12-21T21:11:41ZspaUniversidad PanamericanaTópicos0188-66492007-84982013-11-0116193710.21555/top.v16i1.382381Pasión e identidadJaime Araos San Martín0Universidad de ChileIn this paper, I attemp to clarify the controversial use of pathêmata tîs psuchês, made by Aristotle in De Anima and De Interpretatione, specially when he signifies the act of thinking (noein), thoughts (noemata) and knowledge in general. I defend the thesis that the term pathos is essential for Aristotle's theory of knowledge. My argument is based upon the distinction, made by Aristotle in De Anima and Metaphysics, betwen two meanings of this term: (i) as movement to the other (alloiôsis), and (ii) as growth to the same (homoiôsis). I interpret the latter in connection with the act (energeia), and I state the senses in which it would be proper to predicate the passibility and the impassibility of the faculties of cognition, the things which are known, and knowledge itself as act.http://topicosojs.up.edu.mx/ojs/index.php/topicos/article/view/382AristótelesconocimientoDe Animapasiónpathos. |
| spellingShingle | Jaime Araos San Martín Pasión e identidad Tópicos Aristóteles conocimiento De Anima pasión pathos. |
| title | Pasión e identidad |
| title_full | Pasión e identidad |
| title_fullStr | Pasión e identidad |
| title_full_unstemmed | Pasión e identidad |
| title_short | Pasión e identidad |
| title_sort | pasion e identidad |
| topic | Aristóteles conocimiento De Anima pasión pathos. |
| url | http://topicosojs.up.edu.mx/ojs/index.php/topicos/article/view/382 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT jaimearaossanmartin pasioneidentidad |