Cartesian dualism and disabled phenomenology

In this paper, I critically examine phenomenological disability studies' critique of so-called ‘Cartesian Dualism’. I argue that it is not a metaphysical divide between mental and extended substance that disability studies must overcome, but rather a more fundamental understanding of world unde...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Thomas Abrams
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Stockholm University Press 2015-01-01
Series:Scandinavian Journal of Disability Research
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.sjdr.se/articles/316
_version_ 1827840594274156544
author Thomas Abrams
author_facet Thomas Abrams
author_sort Thomas Abrams
collection DOAJ
description In this paper, I critically examine phenomenological disability studies' critique of so-called ‘Cartesian Dualism’. I argue that it is not a metaphysical divide between mental and extended substance that disability studies must overcome, but rather a more fundamental understanding of world understood only in terms of substance, what Martin Heidegger calls the ‘ontology of objective presence’. This view of ‘the world’ passes over being-in-the-world and the problem of meaning. After outlining phenomenological disability studies' objection to Descartes' legacy, I critically contrast the mind–body problem with the substance problem, suggesting the latter is crucial, and the former derivative. I conclude by discussing the contours of a disabled phenomenology: one that takes physical and mental difference as the basis for a theoretical project, rather than another site for phenomenological investigation.
first_indexed 2024-03-12T07:36:26Z
format Article
id doaj.art-902d8beddf03448cb45b003c94199e5c
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1501-7419
1745-3011
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-12T07:36:26Z
publishDate 2015-01-01
publisher Stockholm University Press
record_format Article
series Scandinavian Journal of Disability Research
spelling doaj.art-902d8beddf03448cb45b003c94199e5c2023-09-02T21:31:04ZengStockholm University PressScandinavian Journal of Disability Research1501-74191745-30112015-01-0118211812810.1080/15017419.2014.995219246Cartesian dualism and disabled phenomenologyThomas Abrams0Department of Social Justice Education, Ontario Institute for Studies in Education, University of Toronto, 252 Bloor Street West, Toronto, ON M5S 1V6, CanadaIn this paper, I critically examine phenomenological disability studies' critique of so-called ‘Cartesian Dualism’. I argue that it is not a metaphysical divide between mental and extended substance that disability studies must overcome, but rather a more fundamental understanding of world understood only in terms of substance, what Martin Heidegger calls the ‘ontology of objective presence’. This view of ‘the world’ passes over being-in-the-world and the problem of meaning. After outlining phenomenological disability studies' objection to Descartes' legacy, I critically contrast the mind–body problem with the substance problem, suggesting the latter is crucial, and the former derivative. I conclude by discussing the contours of a disabled phenomenology: one that takes physical and mental difference as the basis for a theoretical project, rather than another site for phenomenological investigation.https://www.sjdr.se/articles/316Cartesian dualismHeideggerphenomenologysubjectivity
spellingShingle Thomas Abrams
Cartesian dualism and disabled phenomenology
Scandinavian Journal of Disability Research
Cartesian dualism
Heidegger
phenomenology
subjectivity
title Cartesian dualism and disabled phenomenology
title_full Cartesian dualism and disabled phenomenology
title_fullStr Cartesian dualism and disabled phenomenology
title_full_unstemmed Cartesian dualism and disabled phenomenology
title_short Cartesian dualism and disabled phenomenology
title_sort cartesian dualism and disabled phenomenology
topic Cartesian dualism
Heidegger
phenomenology
subjectivity
url https://www.sjdr.se/articles/316
work_keys_str_mv AT thomasabrams cartesiandualismanddisabledphenomenology