Analysis of technology, time and costs of three methods of building a single-family house: traditional brick, reinforced concrete prefabrication, timber frame

The article presents a comprehensive analysis of technology, time and costs of three methods of building a single-family house; traditional brick, reinforced concrete prefabrication and timber frame. The goal of this study was to determine if prefabricated and timber frame building methods and mater...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Grzegorz Wrzesiński, Katarzyna Pawluk, Marzena Lendo-Siwicka, Jan Kowalski
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Polish Academy of Sciences 2023-06-01
Series:Archives of Civil Engineering
Subjects:
Online Access:https://journals.pan.pl/Content/127735/PDF/art02_int.pdf
_version_ 1797791530721738752
author Grzegorz Wrzesiński
Katarzyna Pawluk
Marzena Lendo-Siwicka
Jan Kowalski
author_facet Grzegorz Wrzesiński
Katarzyna Pawluk
Marzena Lendo-Siwicka
Jan Kowalski
author_sort Grzegorz Wrzesiński
collection DOAJ
description The article presents a comprehensive analysis of technology, time and costs of three methods of building a single-family house; traditional brick, reinforced concrete prefabrication and timber frame. The goal of this study was to determine if prefabricated and timber frame building methods and materials have the potential to replace traditional method of construction in the context of cost and time. For this purpose, a qualitative analysis was performed, including a list of benefits of each of the analysed construction technologies and a quantitative analysis in which the cost of finished houses per 1 m2 of usable area was compared. The analyses were conducted for two single-family houses with similar characteristics using scheduling and cost estimation software. The conducted analyses have shown that the shortest time to build a house is in the prefabricated reinforced concrete technology. The used construction technology from ready-made prefabricated elements affects the time of building house and thus, the costs of its construction. The construction time for the house in case of a timber frame structure and made of ready-made reinforced concrete prefabricated elements is similar but the cost of a timber frame structure is much higher. It takes longest time to build a house in traditional brick technology and requires the involvement of the largest financial resources from all three analysed construction technologies. Despite this, traditional brick technology is the most used in construction in Poland and other Central and Easter Europe countries. This is due to the widespread belief of investors about the durability of a building made in this technology and the habits of investors resulting from a long-standing tradition of construction. However, the study’s results in the world showed that a change in build technology is a step in addressing the concerns of poor quality and reduce construction costs and time, increasing the construction sector’s productivity and sustainability.
first_indexed 2024-03-13T02:20:09Z
format Article
id doaj.art-902fd4c883bd4ab9aa2f0259bac9c510
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1230-2945
2300-3103
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-13T02:20:09Z
publishDate 2023-06-01
publisher Polish Academy of Sciences
record_format Article
series Archives of Civil Engineering
spelling doaj.art-902fd4c883bd4ab9aa2f0259bac9c5102023-06-30T10:08:30ZengPolish Academy of SciencesArchives of Civil Engineering1230-29452300-31032023-06-01vol. 69No 22339https://doi.org/10.24425/ace.2023.145250Analysis of technology, time and costs of three methods of building a single-family house: traditional brick, reinforced concrete prefabrication, timber frameGrzegorz Wrzesiński0https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7715-3927Katarzyna Pawluk1https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6632-832XMarzena Lendo-Siwicka2https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3457-2464Jan Kowalski3Warsaw University of Life Sciences, Institute of Civil Engineering, Nowoursynowska 159, 02-776 Warsaw, PolandWarsaw University of Life Sciences, Institute of Civil Engineering, Nowoursynowska 159, 02-776 Warsaw, PolandWarsaw University of Life Sciences, Institute of Civil Engineering, Nowoursynowska 159, 02-776 Warsaw, PolandWarsaw University of Life Sciences, Institute of Civil Engineering, Nowoursynowska 159, 02-776 Warsaw, PolandThe article presents a comprehensive analysis of technology, time and costs of three methods of building a single-family house; traditional brick, reinforced concrete prefabrication and timber frame. The goal of this study was to determine if prefabricated and timber frame building methods and materials have the potential to replace traditional method of construction in the context of cost and time. For this purpose, a qualitative analysis was performed, including a list of benefits of each of the analysed construction technologies and a quantitative analysis in which the cost of finished houses per 1 m2 of usable area was compared. The analyses were conducted for two single-family houses with similar characteristics using scheduling and cost estimation software. The conducted analyses have shown that the shortest time to build a house is in the prefabricated reinforced concrete technology. The used construction technology from ready-made prefabricated elements affects the time of building house and thus, the costs of its construction. The construction time for the house in case of a timber frame structure and made of ready-made reinforced concrete prefabricated elements is similar but the cost of a timber frame structure is much higher. It takes longest time to build a house in traditional brick technology and requires the involvement of the largest financial resources from all three analysed construction technologies. Despite this, traditional brick technology is the most used in construction in Poland and other Central and Easter Europe countries. This is due to the widespread belief of investors about the durability of a building made in this technology and the habits of investors resulting from a long-standing tradition of construction. However, the study’s results in the world showed that a change in build technology is a step in addressing the concerns of poor quality and reduce construction costs and time, increasing the construction sector’s productivity and sustainability.https://journals.pan.pl/Content/127735/PDF/art02_int.pdfsingle-family housetraditionally brick houseprefabricated reinforced concrete housetimber frame houseconstruction timeconstruction cost
spellingShingle Grzegorz Wrzesiński
Katarzyna Pawluk
Marzena Lendo-Siwicka
Jan Kowalski
Analysis of technology, time and costs of three methods of building a single-family house: traditional brick, reinforced concrete prefabrication, timber frame
Archives of Civil Engineering
single-family house
traditionally brick house
prefabricated reinforced concrete house
timber frame house
construction time
construction cost
title Analysis of technology, time and costs of three methods of building a single-family house: traditional brick, reinforced concrete prefabrication, timber frame
title_full Analysis of technology, time and costs of three methods of building a single-family house: traditional brick, reinforced concrete prefabrication, timber frame
title_fullStr Analysis of technology, time and costs of three methods of building a single-family house: traditional brick, reinforced concrete prefabrication, timber frame
title_full_unstemmed Analysis of technology, time and costs of three methods of building a single-family house: traditional brick, reinforced concrete prefabrication, timber frame
title_short Analysis of technology, time and costs of three methods of building a single-family house: traditional brick, reinforced concrete prefabrication, timber frame
title_sort analysis of technology time and costs of three methods of building a single family house traditional brick reinforced concrete prefabrication timber frame
topic single-family house
traditionally brick house
prefabricated reinforced concrete house
timber frame house
construction time
construction cost
url https://journals.pan.pl/Content/127735/PDF/art02_int.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT grzegorzwrzesinski analysisoftechnologytimeandcostsofthreemethodsofbuildingasinglefamilyhousetraditionalbrickreinforcedconcreteprefabricationtimberframe
AT katarzynapawluk analysisoftechnologytimeandcostsofthreemethodsofbuildingasinglefamilyhousetraditionalbrickreinforcedconcreteprefabricationtimberframe
AT marzenalendosiwicka analysisoftechnologytimeandcostsofthreemethodsofbuildingasinglefamilyhousetraditionalbrickreinforcedconcreteprefabricationtimberframe
AT jankowalski analysisoftechnologytimeandcostsofthreemethodsofbuildingasinglefamilyhousetraditionalbrickreinforcedconcreteprefabricationtimberframe