Management of malignant pleural effusion in Italian clinical practice: a nationwide survey

Abstract Background Pleural disease (PD), particularly malignant pleural effusion (MPE), is a common cause of hospital admission and its prevalence is rising worldwide. Recent advances in diagnostic and therapeutic options, such as Indwelling Pleural Catheters (IPCs), have simplified PD treatment, a...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Federico Mei, Mario Tamburrini, Francesca Gonnelli, Luca Morandi, Martina Bonifazi, Michele Sediari, Alessandro di Marco Berardino, Emanuela Barisione, Giuseppe Failla, Lina Zuccatosta, Alberto Papi, Stefano Gasparini, Giampietro Marchetti
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2023-07-01
Series:BMC Pulmonary Medicine
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1186/s12890-023-02530-4
_version_ 1797779065464160256
author Federico Mei
Mario Tamburrini
Francesca Gonnelli
Luca Morandi
Martina Bonifazi
Michele Sediari
Alessandro di Marco Berardino
Emanuela Barisione
Giuseppe Failla
Lina Zuccatosta
Alberto Papi
Stefano Gasparini
Giampietro Marchetti
author_facet Federico Mei
Mario Tamburrini
Francesca Gonnelli
Luca Morandi
Martina Bonifazi
Michele Sediari
Alessandro di Marco Berardino
Emanuela Barisione
Giuseppe Failla
Lina Zuccatosta
Alberto Papi
Stefano Gasparini
Giampietro Marchetti
author_sort Federico Mei
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Background Pleural disease (PD), particularly malignant pleural effusion (MPE), is a common cause of hospital admission and its prevalence is rising worldwide. Recent advances in diagnostic and therapeutic options, such as Indwelling Pleural Catheters (IPCs), have simplified PD treatment, allowing an effective outpatients management. Therefore, dedicated pleural services can improve PD care, guaranteeing specialized management and optimizing time and cost. We aimed to provide an overview on MPE management in Italy, mainly focused on distribution and characteristics of pleural services and IPCs use. Methods A nationwide survey, endorsed by the Italian Thoracic Society, was distributed by email to members of selected subgroups in 2021. Results Ninety (23%) members replied, most of whom being pulmonologists (91%). MPE resulted the most common cause of pleural effusion and was managed with heterogenous approaches, including talc pleurodesis via slurry (43%), talc poudrage (31%), repeated thoracentesis (22%) and IPCs insertion (2%). The setting of IPC insertion was inpatient care in 48% of cases, with a predominance of draining frequency every other day. IPC management mainly relied on caregivers (42%). The presence of a pleural service was reported by 37% of respondents. Conclusions The present study provides an extensive overview of MPE management in Italy, showing a highly heterogeneous approach, a scarce prevalence of out-patient pleural services, and a still limited adoption of IPCs, mainly due to lack of dedicated community care systems. This survey emphasizes the need of promoting a higher spreading of pleural services and an innovative healthcare delivery with more favourable cost-benefit ratio.
first_indexed 2024-03-12T23:26:20Z
format Article
id doaj.art-9030b2866a4744dab8286e3762d0cbf2
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1471-2466
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-12T23:26:20Z
publishDate 2023-07-01
publisher BMC
record_format Article
series BMC Pulmonary Medicine
spelling doaj.art-9030b2866a4744dab8286e3762d0cbf22023-07-16T11:08:23ZengBMCBMC Pulmonary Medicine1471-24662023-07-012311710.1186/s12890-023-02530-4Management of malignant pleural effusion in Italian clinical practice: a nationwide surveyFederico Mei0Mario Tamburrini1Francesca Gonnelli2Luca Morandi3Martina Bonifazi4Michele Sediari5Alessandro di Marco Berardino6Emanuela Barisione7Giuseppe Failla8Lina Zuccatosta9Alberto Papi10Stefano Gasparini11Giampietro Marchetti12Respiratory Diseases Unit, Department of Internal Medicine, Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria delle MarcheRespiratory Medicine, Emergency Department, Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria FerraraRespiratory Diseases Unit, Department of Internal Medicine, Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria delle MarcheRespiratory Medicine, Emergency Department, Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria FerraraRespiratory Diseases Unit, Department of Internal Medicine, Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria delle MarcheRespiratory Diseases Unit, Department of Internal Medicine, Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria delle MarcheRespiratory Diseases Unit, Department of Internal Medicine, Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria delle MarcheUOC Interventional Pulmonology, IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San MartinoInterventional Pulmunology, Ospedale A. CardarelliRespiratory Diseases Unit, Department of Internal Medicine, Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria delle MarcheRespiratory Medicine, Emergency Department, Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria FerraraRespiratory Diseases Unit, Department of Internal Medicine, Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria delle MarchePulmonology Unit, ASST Spedali CiviliAbstract Background Pleural disease (PD), particularly malignant pleural effusion (MPE), is a common cause of hospital admission and its prevalence is rising worldwide. Recent advances in diagnostic and therapeutic options, such as Indwelling Pleural Catheters (IPCs), have simplified PD treatment, allowing an effective outpatients management. Therefore, dedicated pleural services can improve PD care, guaranteeing specialized management and optimizing time and cost. We aimed to provide an overview on MPE management in Italy, mainly focused on distribution and characteristics of pleural services and IPCs use. Methods A nationwide survey, endorsed by the Italian Thoracic Society, was distributed by email to members of selected subgroups in 2021. Results Ninety (23%) members replied, most of whom being pulmonologists (91%). MPE resulted the most common cause of pleural effusion and was managed with heterogenous approaches, including talc pleurodesis via slurry (43%), talc poudrage (31%), repeated thoracentesis (22%) and IPCs insertion (2%). The setting of IPC insertion was inpatient care in 48% of cases, with a predominance of draining frequency every other day. IPC management mainly relied on caregivers (42%). The presence of a pleural service was reported by 37% of respondents. Conclusions The present study provides an extensive overview of MPE management in Italy, showing a highly heterogeneous approach, a scarce prevalence of out-patient pleural services, and a still limited adoption of IPCs, mainly due to lack of dedicated community care systems. This survey emphasizes the need of promoting a higher spreading of pleural services and an innovative healthcare delivery with more favourable cost-benefit ratio.https://doi.org/10.1186/s12890-023-02530-4Pleural serviceIndwelling pleural catheterPleural diseasesMalignant pleural effusion, outpatient care
spellingShingle Federico Mei
Mario Tamburrini
Francesca Gonnelli
Luca Morandi
Martina Bonifazi
Michele Sediari
Alessandro di Marco Berardino
Emanuela Barisione
Giuseppe Failla
Lina Zuccatosta
Alberto Papi
Stefano Gasparini
Giampietro Marchetti
Management of malignant pleural effusion in Italian clinical practice: a nationwide survey
BMC Pulmonary Medicine
Pleural service
Indwelling pleural catheter
Pleural diseases
Malignant pleural effusion, outpatient care
title Management of malignant pleural effusion in Italian clinical practice: a nationwide survey
title_full Management of malignant pleural effusion in Italian clinical practice: a nationwide survey
title_fullStr Management of malignant pleural effusion in Italian clinical practice: a nationwide survey
title_full_unstemmed Management of malignant pleural effusion in Italian clinical practice: a nationwide survey
title_short Management of malignant pleural effusion in Italian clinical practice: a nationwide survey
title_sort management of malignant pleural effusion in italian clinical practice a nationwide survey
topic Pleural service
Indwelling pleural catheter
Pleural diseases
Malignant pleural effusion, outpatient care
url https://doi.org/10.1186/s12890-023-02530-4
work_keys_str_mv AT federicomei managementofmalignantpleuraleffusioninitalianclinicalpracticeanationwidesurvey
AT mariotamburrini managementofmalignantpleuraleffusioninitalianclinicalpracticeanationwidesurvey
AT francescagonnelli managementofmalignantpleuraleffusioninitalianclinicalpracticeanationwidesurvey
AT lucamorandi managementofmalignantpleuraleffusioninitalianclinicalpracticeanationwidesurvey
AT martinabonifazi managementofmalignantpleuraleffusioninitalianclinicalpracticeanationwidesurvey
AT michelesediari managementofmalignantpleuraleffusioninitalianclinicalpracticeanationwidesurvey
AT alessandrodimarcoberardino managementofmalignantpleuraleffusioninitalianclinicalpracticeanationwidesurvey
AT emanuelabarisione managementofmalignantpleuraleffusioninitalianclinicalpracticeanationwidesurvey
AT giuseppefailla managementofmalignantpleuraleffusioninitalianclinicalpracticeanationwidesurvey
AT linazuccatosta managementofmalignantpleuraleffusioninitalianclinicalpracticeanationwidesurvey
AT albertopapi managementofmalignantpleuraleffusioninitalianclinicalpracticeanationwidesurvey
AT stefanogasparini managementofmalignantpleuraleffusioninitalianclinicalpracticeanationwidesurvey
AT giampietromarchetti managementofmalignantpleuraleffusioninitalianclinicalpracticeanationwidesurvey