Making Up Peoples? Conferralism about Nationality

I will apply Ásta’s conferralist account of sex and gender to nationality, and distinguish two different ways in which nationality is conferred – by institutions (legal nationality), and in social interactions (social nationality). I will then turn to the moral and political conflicts that arise whe...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Behrensen Maren
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: University of Vienna 2018-02-01
Series:Journal of Social Ontology
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1515/jso-2017-0020
_version_ 1827844118182625280
author Behrensen Maren
author_facet Behrensen Maren
author_sort Behrensen Maren
collection DOAJ
description I will apply Ásta’s conferralist account of sex and gender to nationality, and distinguish two different ways in which nationality is conferred – by institutions (legal nationality), and in social interactions (social nationality). I will then turn to the moral and political conflicts that arise where different understandings of nationality and different ways of conferring it overlap and collide. My main thesis is that these conflicts are never simply factual disputes about who and what belongs to a nation, they are always normative conflicts about who ought to belong. This, in turn, means that we cannot think about the ontology of nationality without thinking about what nationality ought to be, a conclusion that is well in line with the basic tenets of conferralism.
first_indexed 2024-03-12T08:36:57Z
format Article
id doaj.art-90522ac412f54bc3a2d767fea788fc70
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2196-9655
2196-9663
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-12T08:36:57Z
publishDate 2018-02-01
publisher University of Vienna
record_format Article
series Journal of Social Ontology
spelling doaj.art-90522ac412f54bc3a2d767fea788fc702023-09-02T17:10:26ZengUniversity of ViennaJournal of Social Ontology2196-96552196-96632018-02-0141295110.1515/jso-2017-0020jso-2017-0020Making Up Peoples? Conferralism about NationalityBehrensen Maren0Institut für Christliche Sozialwissenschaften, Westfälische Wilhelms-Universität, Münster, GermanyI will apply Ásta’s conferralist account of sex and gender to nationality, and distinguish two different ways in which nationality is conferred – by institutions (legal nationality), and in social interactions (social nationality). I will then turn to the moral and political conflicts that arise where different understandings of nationality and different ways of conferring it overlap and collide. My main thesis is that these conflicts are never simply factual disputes about who and what belongs to a nation, they are always normative conflicts about who ought to belong. This, in turn, means that we cannot think about the ontology of nationality without thinking about what nationality ought to be, a conclusion that is well in line with the basic tenets of conferralism.https://doi.org/10.1515/jso-2017-0020nationalityontology of nationsnational identitynationality and genderinstitutional facts
spellingShingle Behrensen Maren
Making Up Peoples? Conferralism about Nationality
Journal of Social Ontology
nationality
ontology of nations
national identity
nationality and gender
institutional facts
title Making Up Peoples? Conferralism about Nationality
title_full Making Up Peoples? Conferralism about Nationality
title_fullStr Making Up Peoples? Conferralism about Nationality
title_full_unstemmed Making Up Peoples? Conferralism about Nationality
title_short Making Up Peoples? Conferralism about Nationality
title_sort making up peoples conferralism about nationality
topic nationality
ontology of nations
national identity
nationality and gender
institutional facts
url https://doi.org/10.1515/jso-2017-0020
work_keys_str_mv AT behrensenmaren makinguppeoplesconferralismaboutnationality