LICENSING AND CERTIFICATION ACTIVITIES OF NON-STATE FORENSIC INSTITUTIONS: THEORY, LEGISLATION, LAW ENFORCEMENT PRACTICE (CRIMINAL PROCEDURAL ASPECT)
This article comprehensively and adequately considered some theoretical and practical aspects concerning the types of expert activities, the implementation of which non-state forensic-expert institution should have an appropriate license issued by them in the manner prescribed by law. Reflected the...
Main Authors: | , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | Russian |
Published: |
Dostoevsky Omsk State University
2017-03-01
|
Series: | Pravoprimenenie |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://enforcement.omsu.ru/jour/article/view/53 |
_version_ | 1797874076855828480 |
---|---|
author | I. Tarichko A. Kondratyev |
author_facet | I. Tarichko A. Kondratyev |
author_sort | I. Tarichko |
collection | DOAJ |
description | This article comprehensively and adequately considered some theoretical and practical aspects concerning the types of expert activities, the implementation of which non-state forensic-expert institution should have an appropriate license issued by them in the manner prescribed by law. Reflected the current system of voluntary certification for the test subject non-state forensic activities. The analysis of judicial practice on sample questions provided law enforcement mistakes of actors eligible to appoint a forensic examination in the criminal case, invited some of the trends of the current legislation.As shown in the examples, despite explicit legal requirements on licensing of certain types of expertise-there are still violations of non-state forensic agencies. Regarding the certification of the institutions, we note that the absence in the law on forensic examination requirements for mandatory certification activities of non-state forensic institutions allow these organizations to make a decision about the need of certification of their activities. This approach of the legislator to the activities of non-state forensic institutions in light of the discussion in this section is not correct, in view of what we have proposed recommendations to improve normative-legal regulation in the field of forensics. |
first_indexed | 2024-04-10T01:25:08Z |
format | Article |
id | doaj.art-907cce3810b843c588a0ad00c93a8a96 |
institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
issn | 2542-1514 |
language | Russian |
last_indexed | 2024-04-10T01:25:08Z |
publishDate | 2017-03-01 |
publisher | Dostoevsky Omsk State University |
record_format | Article |
series | Pravoprimenenie |
spelling | doaj.art-907cce3810b843c588a0ad00c93a8a962023-03-13T09:40:19ZrusDostoevsky Omsk State UniversityPravoprimenenie2542-15142017-03-011112913810.24147/2542-1514.2017.1(1).129-13843LICENSING AND CERTIFICATION ACTIVITIES OF NON-STATE FORENSIC INSTITUTIONS: THEORY, LEGISLATION, LAW ENFORCEMENT PRACTICE (CRIMINAL PROCEDURAL ASPECT)I. Tarichko0A. Kondratyev1Dostoevsky Omsk State UniversityDostoevsky Omsk State UniversityThis article comprehensively and adequately considered some theoretical and practical aspects concerning the types of expert activities, the implementation of which non-state forensic-expert institution should have an appropriate license issued by them in the manner prescribed by law. Reflected the current system of voluntary certification for the test subject non-state forensic activities. The analysis of judicial practice on sample questions provided law enforcement mistakes of actors eligible to appoint a forensic examination in the criminal case, invited some of the trends of the current legislation.As shown in the examples, despite explicit legal requirements on licensing of certain types of expertise-there are still violations of non-state forensic agencies. Regarding the certification of the institutions, we note that the absence in the law on forensic examination requirements for mandatory certification activities of non-state forensic institutions allow these organizations to make a decision about the need of certification of their activities. This approach of the legislator to the activities of non-state forensic institutions in light of the discussion in this section is not correct, in view of what we have proposed recommendations to improve normative-legal regulation in the field of forensics.https://enforcement.omsu.ru/jour/article/view/53licensingcertificationnon-state forensic institutionforensiclitigationenforcement errorsimproving legislation |
spellingShingle | I. Tarichko A. Kondratyev LICENSING AND CERTIFICATION ACTIVITIES OF NON-STATE FORENSIC INSTITUTIONS: THEORY, LEGISLATION, LAW ENFORCEMENT PRACTICE (CRIMINAL PROCEDURAL ASPECT) Pravoprimenenie licensing certification non-state forensic institution forensic litigation enforcement errors improving legislation |
title | LICENSING AND CERTIFICATION ACTIVITIES OF NON-STATE FORENSIC INSTITUTIONS: THEORY, LEGISLATION, LAW ENFORCEMENT PRACTICE (CRIMINAL PROCEDURAL ASPECT) |
title_full | LICENSING AND CERTIFICATION ACTIVITIES OF NON-STATE FORENSIC INSTITUTIONS: THEORY, LEGISLATION, LAW ENFORCEMENT PRACTICE (CRIMINAL PROCEDURAL ASPECT) |
title_fullStr | LICENSING AND CERTIFICATION ACTIVITIES OF NON-STATE FORENSIC INSTITUTIONS: THEORY, LEGISLATION, LAW ENFORCEMENT PRACTICE (CRIMINAL PROCEDURAL ASPECT) |
title_full_unstemmed | LICENSING AND CERTIFICATION ACTIVITIES OF NON-STATE FORENSIC INSTITUTIONS: THEORY, LEGISLATION, LAW ENFORCEMENT PRACTICE (CRIMINAL PROCEDURAL ASPECT) |
title_short | LICENSING AND CERTIFICATION ACTIVITIES OF NON-STATE FORENSIC INSTITUTIONS: THEORY, LEGISLATION, LAW ENFORCEMENT PRACTICE (CRIMINAL PROCEDURAL ASPECT) |
title_sort | licensing and certification activities of non state forensic institutions theory legislation law enforcement practice criminal procedural aspect |
topic | licensing certification non-state forensic institution forensic litigation enforcement errors improving legislation |
url | https://enforcement.omsu.ru/jour/article/view/53 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT itarichko licensingandcertificationactivitiesofnonstateforensicinstitutionstheorylegislationlawenforcementpracticecriminalproceduralaspect AT akondratyev licensingandcertificationactivitiesofnonstateforensicinstitutionstheorylegislationlawenforcementpracticecriminalproceduralaspect |