Klobuchar, NeQuickG, BDGIM, GLONASS, IRI-2016, IRI-2012, IRI-Plas, NeQuick2, and GEMTEC Ionospheric Models: A Comparison in Total Electron Content and Positioning Domains

Global navigation satellite systems (GNSS) provide a great data source about the ionosphere state. These data can be used for testing ionosphere models. We studied the performance of nine ionospheric models (Klobuchar, NeQuickG, BDGIM, GLONASS, IRI-2016, IRI-2012, IRI-Plas, NeQuick2, and GEMTEC) bot...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Yury V. Yasyukevich, Dmitry Zatolokin, Artem Padokhin, Ningbo Wang, Bruno Nava, Zishen Li, Yunbin Yuan, Anna Yasyukevich, Chuanfu Chen, Artem Vesnin
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2023-05-01
Series:Sensors
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/1424-8220/23/10/4773
_version_ 1797598392090624000
author Yury V. Yasyukevich
Dmitry Zatolokin
Artem Padokhin
Ningbo Wang
Bruno Nava
Zishen Li
Yunbin Yuan
Anna Yasyukevich
Chuanfu Chen
Artem Vesnin
author_facet Yury V. Yasyukevich
Dmitry Zatolokin
Artem Padokhin
Ningbo Wang
Bruno Nava
Zishen Li
Yunbin Yuan
Anna Yasyukevich
Chuanfu Chen
Artem Vesnin
author_sort Yury V. Yasyukevich
collection DOAJ
description Global navigation satellite systems (GNSS) provide a great data source about the ionosphere state. These data can be used for testing ionosphere models. We studied the performance of nine ionospheric models (Klobuchar, NeQuickG, BDGIM, GLONASS, IRI-2016, IRI-2012, IRI-Plas, NeQuick2, and GEMTEC) both in the total electron content (TEC) domain—i.e., how precise the models calculate TEC—and in the positioning error domain—i.e., how the models improve single frequency positioning. The whole data set covers 20 years (2000–2020) from 13 GNSS stations, but the main analysis involves data during 2014–2020 when calculations are available from all the models. We used single-frequency positioning without ionospheric correction and with correction via global ionospheric maps (IGSG) data as expected limits for errors. Improvements against noncorrected solution were as follows: GIM IGSG—22.0%, BDGIM—15.3%, NeQuick2—13.8%, GEMTEC, NeQuickG and IRI-2016—13.3%, Klobuchar—13.2%, IRI-2012—11.6%, IRI-Plas—8.0%, GLONASS—7.3%. TEC bias and mean absolute TEC errors for the models are as follows: GEMTEC—−0.3 and 2.4 TECU, BDGIM—−0.7 and 2.9 TECU, NeQuick2—−1.2 and 3.5 TECU, IRI-2012—−1.5 and 3.2 TECU, NeQuickG—−1.5 and 3.5 TECU, IRI-2016—−1.8 and 3.2 TECU, Klobuchar—1.2 and 4.9 TECU, GLONASS—−1.9 and 4.8 TECU, and IRI-Plas—3.1 and 4.2 TECU. While TEC and positioning domains differ, new-generation operational models (BDGIM and NeQuickG) could overperform or at least be at the same level as classical empirical models.
first_indexed 2024-03-11T03:20:32Z
format Article
id doaj.art-9081846fde594e56bd6801e49328e6f2
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1424-8220
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-11T03:20:32Z
publishDate 2023-05-01
publisher MDPI AG
record_format Article
series Sensors
spelling doaj.art-9081846fde594e56bd6801e49328e6f22023-11-18T03:12:21ZengMDPI AGSensors1424-82202023-05-012310477310.3390/s23104773Klobuchar, NeQuickG, BDGIM, GLONASS, IRI-2016, IRI-2012, IRI-Plas, NeQuick2, and GEMTEC Ionospheric Models: A Comparison in Total Electron Content and Positioning DomainsYury V. Yasyukevich0Dmitry Zatolokin1Artem Padokhin2Ningbo Wang3Bruno Nava4Zishen Li5Yunbin Yuan6Anna Yasyukevich7Chuanfu Chen8Artem Vesnin9Institute of Solar-Terrestrial Physics SB RAS, 664033 Irkutsk, RussiaInstitute of Solar-Terrestrial Physics SB RAS, 664033 Irkutsk, RussiaPushkov Institute of Terrestrial Magnetism, Ionosphere and Radio Wave Propagation, Russian Academy of Sciences, 108840 Moscow, RussiaAerospace Information Research Institute (AIR), Chinese Academy of Sciences (CAS), Beijing 100864, ChinaThe Abdus Salam International Centre for Theoretical Physics, I-34151 Trieste, ItalyAerospace Information Research Institute (AIR), Chinese Academy of Sciences (CAS), Beijing 100864, ChinaInnovation Academy for Precision Measurement Science and Technology (APM), Chinese Academy of Sciences (CAS), Wuhan 430074, ChinaInstitute of Solar-Terrestrial Physics SB RAS, 664033 Irkutsk, RussiaFaculty of Physics, Lomonosov Moscow State University, 119991 Moscow, RussiaInstitute of Solar-Terrestrial Physics SB RAS, 664033 Irkutsk, RussiaGlobal navigation satellite systems (GNSS) provide a great data source about the ionosphere state. These data can be used for testing ionosphere models. We studied the performance of nine ionospheric models (Klobuchar, NeQuickG, BDGIM, GLONASS, IRI-2016, IRI-2012, IRI-Plas, NeQuick2, and GEMTEC) both in the total electron content (TEC) domain—i.e., how precise the models calculate TEC—and in the positioning error domain—i.e., how the models improve single frequency positioning. The whole data set covers 20 years (2000–2020) from 13 GNSS stations, but the main analysis involves data during 2014–2020 when calculations are available from all the models. We used single-frequency positioning without ionospheric correction and with correction via global ionospheric maps (IGSG) data as expected limits for errors. Improvements against noncorrected solution were as follows: GIM IGSG—22.0%, BDGIM—15.3%, NeQuick2—13.8%, GEMTEC, NeQuickG and IRI-2016—13.3%, Klobuchar—13.2%, IRI-2012—11.6%, IRI-Plas—8.0%, GLONASS—7.3%. TEC bias and mean absolute TEC errors for the models are as follows: GEMTEC—−0.3 and 2.4 TECU, BDGIM—−0.7 and 2.9 TECU, NeQuick2—−1.2 and 3.5 TECU, IRI-2012—−1.5 and 3.2 TECU, NeQuickG—−1.5 and 3.5 TECU, IRI-2016—−1.8 and 3.2 TECU, Klobuchar—1.2 and 4.9 TECU, GLONASS—−1.9 and 4.8 TECU, and IRI-Plas—3.1 and 4.2 TECU. While TEC and positioning domains differ, new-generation operational models (BDGIM and NeQuickG) could overperform or at least be at the same level as classical empirical models.https://www.mdpi.com/1424-8220/23/10/4773ionospheremodelsglobal navigation satellite systemsKlobucharNeQuickIRI
spellingShingle Yury V. Yasyukevich
Dmitry Zatolokin
Artem Padokhin
Ningbo Wang
Bruno Nava
Zishen Li
Yunbin Yuan
Anna Yasyukevich
Chuanfu Chen
Artem Vesnin
Klobuchar, NeQuickG, BDGIM, GLONASS, IRI-2016, IRI-2012, IRI-Plas, NeQuick2, and GEMTEC Ionospheric Models: A Comparison in Total Electron Content and Positioning Domains
Sensors
ionosphere
models
global navigation satellite systems
Klobuchar
NeQuick
IRI
title Klobuchar, NeQuickG, BDGIM, GLONASS, IRI-2016, IRI-2012, IRI-Plas, NeQuick2, and GEMTEC Ionospheric Models: A Comparison in Total Electron Content and Positioning Domains
title_full Klobuchar, NeQuickG, BDGIM, GLONASS, IRI-2016, IRI-2012, IRI-Plas, NeQuick2, and GEMTEC Ionospheric Models: A Comparison in Total Electron Content and Positioning Domains
title_fullStr Klobuchar, NeQuickG, BDGIM, GLONASS, IRI-2016, IRI-2012, IRI-Plas, NeQuick2, and GEMTEC Ionospheric Models: A Comparison in Total Electron Content and Positioning Domains
title_full_unstemmed Klobuchar, NeQuickG, BDGIM, GLONASS, IRI-2016, IRI-2012, IRI-Plas, NeQuick2, and GEMTEC Ionospheric Models: A Comparison in Total Electron Content and Positioning Domains
title_short Klobuchar, NeQuickG, BDGIM, GLONASS, IRI-2016, IRI-2012, IRI-Plas, NeQuick2, and GEMTEC Ionospheric Models: A Comparison in Total Electron Content and Positioning Domains
title_sort klobuchar nequickg bdgim glonass iri 2016 iri 2012 iri plas nequick2 and gemtec ionospheric models a comparison in total electron content and positioning domains
topic ionosphere
models
global navigation satellite systems
Klobuchar
NeQuick
IRI
url https://www.mdpi.com/1424-8220/23/10/4773
work_keys_str_mv AT yuryvyasyukevich klobucharnequickgbdgimglonassiri2016iri2012iriplasnequick2andgemtecionosphericmodelsacomparisonintotalelectroncontentandpositioningdomains
AT dmitryzatolokin klobucharnequickgbdgimglonassiri2016iri2012iriplasnequick2andgemtecionosphericmodelsacomparisonintotalelectroncontentandpositioningdomains
AT artempadokhin klobucharnequickgbdgimglonassiri2016iri2012iriplasnequick2andgemtecionosphericmodelsacomparisonintotalelectroncontentandpositioningdomains
AT ningbowang klobucharnequickgbdgimglonassiri2016iri2012iriplasnequick2andgemtecionosphericmodelsacomparisonintotalelectroncontentandpositioningdomains
AT brunonava klobucharnequickgbdgimglonassiri2016iri2012iriplasnequick2andgemtecionosphericmodelsacomparisonintotalelectroncontentandpositioningdomains
AT zishenli klobucharnequickgbdgimglonassiri2016iri2012iriplasnequick2andgemtecionosphericmodelsacomparisonintotalelectroncontentandpositioningdomains
AT yunbinyuan klobucharnequickgbdgimglonassiri2016iri2012iriplasnequick2andgemtecionosphericmodelsacomparisonintotalelectroncontentandpositioningdomains
AT annayasyukevich klobucharnequickgbdgimglonassiri2016iri2012iriplasnequick2andgemtecionosphericmodelsacomparisonintotalelectroncontentandpositioningdomains
AT chuanfuchen klobucharnequickgbdgimglonassiri2016iri2012iriplasnequick2andgemtecionosphericmodelsacomparisonintotalelectroncontentandpositioningdomains
AT artemvesnin klobucharnequickgbdgimglonassiri2016iri2012iriplasnequick2andgemtecionosphericmodelsacomparisonintotalelectroncontentandpositioningdomains