Reduced susceptibility to interference in the consolidation of motor memory before adolescence.

Are children superior to adults in consolidating procedural memory? This notion has been tied to "critical," early life periods of increased brain plasticity. Here, using a motor sequence learning task, we show, in experiment 1, that a) the rate of learning during a training session, b) th...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Shoshi Dorfberger, Esther Adi-Japha, Avi Karni
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2007-02-01
Series:PLoS ONE
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0000240
_version_ 1818986479333933056
author Shoshi Dorfberger
Esther Adi-Japha
Avi Karni
author_facet Shoshi Dorfberger
Esther Adi-Japha
Avi Karni
author_sort Shoshi Dorfberger
collection DOAJ
description Are children superior to adults in consolidating procedural memory? This notion has been tied to "critical," early life periods of increased brain plasticity. Here, using a motor sequence learning task, we show, in experiment 1, that a) the rate of learning during a training session, b) the gains accrued, without additional practice, within a 24 hours post-training interval (delayed consolidation gains), and c) the long-term retention of these gains, were as effective in 9, 12 and 17-year-olds and comparable to those reported for adults. However, a follow-up experiment showed that the establishment of a memory trace for the trained sequence of movements was significantly more susceptible to interference by a subsequent motor learning experience (practicing a reversed movement sequence) in the 17-year-olds compared to the 9 and 12-year-olds. Unlike the 17-year-olds, the younger age-groups showed significant delayed gains even after interference training. Altogether, our results indicate the existence of an effective consolidation phase in motor learning both before and after adolescence, with no childhood advantage in the learning or retention of a motor skill. However, the ability to co-consolidate different, successive motor experiences, demonstrated in both the 9 and 12-year-olds, diminishes after puberty, suggesting that a more selective memory consolidation process takes over from the childhood one. Only the adult consolidation process is gated by a recency effect, and in situations of multiple, clashing, experiences occurring within a short time-interval, adults may less effectively establish in memory experiences superseded by newer ones.
first_indexed 2024-12-20T18:51:27Z
format Article
id doaj.art-90956f5a7a4041468a47c3f6d8a8f6ac
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1932-6203
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-20T18:51:27Z
publishDate 2007-02-01
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
record_format Article
series PLoS ONE
spelling doaj.art-90956f5a7a4041468a47c3f6d8a8f6ac2022-12-21T19:29:35ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032007-02-0122e24010.1371/journal.pone.0000240Reduced susceptibility to interference in the consolidation of motor memory before adolescence.Shoshi DorfbergerEsther Adi-JaphaAvi KarniAre children superior to adults in consolidating procedural memory? This notion has been tied to "critical," early life periods of increased brain plasticity. Here, using a motor sequence learning task, we show, in experiment 1, that a) the rate of learning during a training session, b) the gains accrued, without additional practice, within a 24 hours post-training interval (delayed consolidation gains), and c) the long-term retention of these gains, were as effective in 9, 12 and 17-year-olds and comparable to those reported for adults. However, a follow-up experiment showed that the establishment of a memory trace for the trained sequence of movements was significantly more susceptible to interference by a subsequent motor learning experience (practicing a reversed movement sequence) in the 17-year-olds compared to the 9 and 12-year-olds. Unlike the 17-year-olds, the younger age-groups showed significant delayed gains even after interference training. Altogether, our results indicate the existence of an effective consolidation phase in motor learning both before and after adolescence, with no childhood advantage in the learning or retention of a motor skill. However, the ability to co-consolidate different, successive motor experiences, demonstrated in both the 9 and 12-year-olds, diminishes after puberty, suggesting that a more selective memory consolidation process takes over from the childhood one. Only the adult consolidation process is gated by a recency effect, and in situations of multiple, clashing, experiences occurring within a short time-interval, adults may less effectively establish in memory experiences superseded by newer ones.https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0000240
spellingShingle Shoshi Dorfberger
Esther Adi-Japha
Avi Karni
Reduced susceptibility to interference in the consolidation of motor memory before adolescence.
PLoS ONE
title Reduced susceptibility to interference in the consolidation of motor memory before adolescence.
title_full Reduced susceptibility to interference in the consolidation of motor memory before adolescence.
title_fullStr Reduced susceptibility to interference in the consolidation of motor memory before adolescence.
title_full_unstemmed Reduced susceptibility to interference in the consolidation of motor memory before adolescence.
title_short Reduced susceptibility to interference in the consolidation of motor memory before adolescence.
title_sort reduced susceptibility to interference in the consolidation of motor memory before adolescence
url https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0000240
work_keys_str_mv AT shoshidorfberger reducedsusceptibilitytointerferenceintheconsolidationofmotormemorybeforeadolescence
AT estheradijapha reducedsusceptibilitytointerferenceintheconsolidationofmotormemorybeforeadolescence
AT avikarni reducedsusceptibilitytointerferenceintheconsolidationofmotormemorybeforeadolescence