In vitro safety “clinical trial” of the cardiac liability of drug polytherapy

Abstract Only a handful of US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) Emergency Use Authorizations exist for drug and biologic therapeutics that treat severe acute respiratory syndrome‐coronavirus 2 (SARS‐CoV‐2) infection. Potential therapeutics include repurposed drugs, some with cardiac liabilities. We...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Bérénice Charrez, Verena Charwat, Brian Siemons, Henrik Finsberg, Evan W. Miller, Andrew G. Edwards, Kevin E. Healy
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2021-05-01
Series:Clinical and Translational Science
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1111/cts.13038
_version_ 1819098173528866816
author Bérénice Charrez
Verena Charwat
Brian Siemons
Henrik Finsberg
Evan W. Miller
Andrew G. Edwards
Kevin E. Healy
author_facet Bérénice Charrez
Verena Charwat
Brian Siemons
Henrik Finsberg
Evan W. Miller
Andrew G. Edwards
Kevin E. Healy
author_sort Bérénice Charrez
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Only a handful of US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) Emergency Use Authorizations exist for drug and biologic therapeutics that treat severe acute respiratory syndrome‐coronavirus 2 (SARS‐CoV‐2) infection. Potential therapeutics include repurposed drugs, some with cardiac liabilities. We report on a chronic preclinical drug screening platform, a cardiac microphysiological system (MPS), to assess cardiotoxicity associated with repurposed hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) and azithromycin (AZM) polytherapy in a mock phase I safety clinical trial. The MPS contained human heart muscle derived from induced pluripotent stem cells. The effect of drug response was measured using outputs that correlate with clinical measurements, such as QT interval (action potential duration) and drug‐biomarker pairing. Chronic exposure (10 days) of heart muscle to HCQ alone elicited early afterdepolarizations and increased QT interval past 5 days. AZM alone elicited an increase in QT interval from day 7 onward, and arrhythmias were observed at days 8 and 10. Monotherapy results mimicked clinical trial outcomes. Upon chronic exposure to HCQ and AZM polytherapy, we observed an increase in QT interval on days 4–8. Interestingly, a decrease in arrhythmias and instabilities was observed in polytherapy relative to monotherapy, in concordance with published clinical trials. Biomarkers, most of them measurable in patients’ serum, were identified for negative effects of monotherapy or polytherapy on tissue contractile function, morphology, and antioxidant protection. The cardiac MPS correctly predicted clinical arrhythmias associated with QT prolongation and rhythm instabilities. This high content system can help clinicians design their trials, rapidly project cardiac outcomes, and define new monitoring biomarkers to accelerate access of patients to safe coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID‐19) therapeutics.
first_indexed 2024-12-22T00:26:47Z
format Article
id doaj.art-909a322bfea042109b6b1af1e914fe94
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1752-8054
1752-8062
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-22T00:26:47Z
publishDate 2021-05-01
publisher Wiley
record_format Article
series Clinical and Translational Science
spelling doaj.art-909a322bfea042109b6b1af1e914fe942022-12-21T18:45:02ZengWileyClinical and Translational Science1752-80541752-80622021-05-011431155116510.1111/cts.13038In vitro safety “clinical trial” of the cardiac liability of drug polytherapyBérénice Charrez0Verena Charwat1Brian Siemons2Henrik Finsberg3Evan W. Miller4Andrew G. Edwards5Kevin E. Healy6Department of Bioengineering and California Institute for Quantitative Biosciences (QB3) University of California at Berkeley Berkeley California USADepartment of Bioengineering and California Institute for Quantitative Biosciences (QB3) University of California at Berkeley Berkeley California USADepartment of Bioengineering and California Institute for Quantitative Biosciences (QB3) University of California at Berkeley Berkeley California USASimula Research Laboratory Oslo NorwayDepartment of Chemistry University of California Berkeley California USADepartment of Pharmacology School of Medicine University of California at Davis Davis California USADepartment of Bioengineering and California Institute for Quantitative Biosciences (QB3) University of California at Berkeley Berkeley California USAAbstract Only a handful of US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) Emergency Use Authorizations exist for drug and biologic therapeutics that treat severe acute respiratory syndrome‐coronavirus 2 (SARS‐CoV‐2) infection. Potential therapeutics include repurposed drugs, some with cardiac liabilities. We report on a chronic preclinical drug screening platform, a cardiac microphysiological system (MPS), to assess cardiotoxicity associated with repurposed hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) and azithromycin (AZM) polytherapy in a mock phase I safety clinical trial. The MPS contained human heart muscle derived from induced pluripotent stem cells. The effect of drug response was measured using outputs that correlate with clinical measurements, such as QT interval (action potential duration) and drug‐biomarker pairing. Chronic exposure (10 days) of heart muscle to HCQ alone elicited early afterdepolarizations and increased QT interval past 5 days. AZM alone elicited an increase in QT interval from day 7 onward, and arrhythmias were observed at days 8 and 10. Monotherapy results mimicked clinical trial outcomes. Upon chronic exposure to HCQ and AZM polytherapy, we observed an increase in QT interval on days 4–8. Interestingly, a decrease in arrhythmias and instabilities was observed in polytherapy relative to monotherapy, in concordance with published clinical trials. Biomarkers, most of them measurable in patients’ serum, were identified for negative effects of monotherapy or polytherapy on tissue contractile function, morphology, and antioxidant protection. The cardiac MPS correctly predicted clinical arrhythmias associated with QT prolongation and rhythm instabilities. This high content system can help clinicians design their trials, rapidly project cardiac outcomes, and define new monitoring biomarkers to accelerate access of patients to safe coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID‐19) therapeutics.https://doi.org/10.1111/cts.13038
spellingShingle Bérénice Charrez
Verena Charwat
Brian Siemons
Henrik Finsberg
Evan W. Miller
Andrew G. Edwards
Kevin E. Healy
In vitro safety “clinical trial” of the cardiac liability of drug polytherapy
Clinical and Translational Science
title In vitro safety “clinical trial” of the cardiac liability of drug polytherapy
title_full In vitro safety “clinical trial” of the cardiac liability of drug polytherapy
title_fullStr In vitro safety “clinical trial” of the cardiac liability of drug polytherapy
title_full_unstemmed In vitro safety “clinical trial” of the cardiac liability of drug polytherapy
title_short In vitro safety “clinical trial” of the cardiac liability of drug polytherapy
title_sort in vitro safety clinical trial of the cardiac liability of drug polytherapy
url https://doi.org/10.1111/cts.13038
work_keys_str_mv AT berenicecharrez invitrosafetyclinicaltrialofthecardiacliabilityofdrugpolytherapy
AT verenacharwat invitrosafetyclinicaltrialofthecardiacliabilityofdrugpolytherapy
AT briansiemons invitrosafetyclinicaltrialofthecardiacliabilityofdrugpolytherapy
AT henrikfinsberg invitrosafetyclinicaltrialofthecardiacliabilityofdrugpolytherapy
AT evanwmiller invitrosafetyclinicaltrialofthecardiacliabilityofdrugpolytherapy
AT andrewgedwards invitrosafetyclinicaltrialofthecardiacliabilityofdrugpolytherapy
AT kevinehealy invitrosafetyclinicaltrialofthecardiacliabilityofdrugpolytherapy