Towards a new European Coastal Mineral Aggregates Planning Regime

A project plan was recently presented in the Netherlands with a view to extracting the riverbed area of the Heesseltsche Uiterwaarden. This is part of the much larger Fort St. Andries project. The area of the Heeseltsche Uiterwaarden is 350 hectares and lies between the villages of Tiel and Neerijne...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Bert Van der Moolen, Ian Wilson
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Politecnico di Torino 2003-11-01
Series:European Journal of Spatial Development
Subjects:
Online Access:https://journals.polito.it/index.php/EJSD/article/view/235
_version_ 1827967046754762752
author Bert Van der Moolen
Ian Wilson
author_facet Bert Van der Moolen
Ian Wilson
author_sort Bert Van der Moolen
collection DOAJ
description A project plan was recently presented in the Netherlands with a view to extracting the riverbed area of the Heesseltsche Uiterwaarden. This is part of the much larger Fort St. Andries project. The area of the Heeseltsche Uiterwaarden is 350 hectares and lies between the villages of Tiel and Neerijnen. In the Environmental Impact Assessment it was concluded that the present ecological values will be affected by the extraction of clay and the dumping of slightly polluted slib. Besides these effects, there is the possibility of negative external effects on traffic and noise. The local inhabitants are organising themselves in a local action committee and are opposing Rijkswaterstaat, which is the formal decision maker for this project. They think that the project includes much that is not necessary. The only thing that they in fact want to see is an increase in protection against extreme high water tides, due to heavy rainfall such as occurred in 1995. At that time most of the area had in fact to be evacuated. There are many of these examples in the Netherlands where local interests conflict with projects of regional, national or even international interest. As such, simple top down organisation of, and an easy commitment to, large -scale spatial developments seems to be no longer acceptable to a majority of the people. A new way of planning and organising is thus needed in order to help realise such projects, most of which inevitably have an enormous impact at the local level. Projects in this category include the Betuwe- and HSL-rail line, the F3B mineral extraction aggregates site, the fifth runway for Schiphol airport, etc (see for example Voogd and van der Moolen, 1995). These examples have to be considered not only in themselves, but also in their larger political context. The social context in terms of authority and legitimacy is changing, particularly with regard to the way in which people react to one another. In the Netherlands the year 2002 must be seen as being of particular importance in this regard, especially as it heralded the dramatic arrival of several new political parties, i.e. ‘Leefbaar Nederland‘ and ‘Lijst Pim Fortuijn’. Instead of the so-called ‘regenteske’ way of dealing with political matters, there should be more transparency, openness and a greater measure of clarity in the way things are decided and organised. Without the pretension to give an accurate description, we could however describe this process as a ‘peoples movement to achieve more power’. We believe this is also reflected in the planning processes of modern large-scale projects in our countries. With respect to mineral aggregates extraction, we have clearly underestimated the management tasks attached to mineral resources according to Neeb and Dahl (2002). It remains a mystery as to why there is so little attention paid to, or appreciation of, mineral aggregates planning. For a long time little attention was paid to what we now call sustainable development. According to MMSD (2002) ‘in the context of the minerals sector, the goal of sustainable development should be to maximise the contribution to the well being of the current generation in a way that ensures an equitable distribution of its costs and benefits, without reducing the potential for future generations to meet their own needs’. Land use management should recognise competing interests and attempt to negotiate according to an integrated land use planning. We feel that the mineral aggregates are not fully appreciated. European Journal of Spatial Development-http://www.nordregio.se/EJSD/-ISSN 1650-9544- Articles Nov 2003- no 1 3 In this paper we attempt to describe this process from the viewpoint of mineral aggregates extraction, with examples from Great Britain and the Netherlands. We will conclude with a proposal on how to deal with such matters in a different way in future.
first_indexed 2024-04-09T17:59:12Z
format Article
id doaj.art-909fd5553b524e7f9dddfe31d0b3e169
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1650-9544
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-09T17:59:12Z
publishDate 2003-11-01
publisher Politecnico di Torino
record_format Article
series European Journal of Spatial Development
spelling doaj.art-909fd5553b524e7f9dddfe31d0b3e1692023-04-14T09:46:56ZengPolitecnico di TorinoEuropean Journal of Spatial Development1650-95442003-11-01191910.5281/zenodo.5145111235Towards a new European Coastal Mineral Aggregates Planning RegimeBert Van der Moolen0Ian Wilson1Syncera GeoDataPrivate consultantA project plan was recently presented in the Netherlands with a view to extracting the riverbed area of the Heesseltsche Uiterwaarden. This is part of the much larger Fort St. Andries project. The area of the Heeseltsche Uiterwaarden is 350 hectares and lies between the villages of Tiel and Neerijnen. In the Environmental Impact Assessment it was concluded that the present ecological values will be affected by the extraction of clay and the dumping of slightly polluted slib. Besides these effects, there is the possibility of negative external effects on traffic and noise. The local inhabitants are organising themselves in a local action committee and are opposing Rijkswaterstaat, which is the formal decision maker for this project. They think that the project includes much that is not necessary. The only thing that they in fact want to see is an increase in protection against extreme high water tides, due to heavy rainfall such as occurred in 1995. At that time most of the area had in fact to be evacuated. There are many of these examples in the Netherlands where local interests conflict with projects of regional, national or even international interest. As such, simple top down organisation of, and an easy commitment to, large -scale spatial developments seems to be no longer acceptable to a majority of the people. A new way of planning and organising is thus needed in order to help realise such projects, most of which inevitably have an enormous impact at the local level. Projects in this category include the Betuwe- and HSL-rail line, the F3B mineral extraction aggregates site, the fifth runway for Schiphol airport, etc (see for example Voogd and van der Moolen, 1995). These examples have to be considered not only in themselves, but also in their larger political context. The social context in terms of authority and legitimacy is changing, particularly with regard to the way in which people react to one another. In the Netherlands the year 2002 must be seen as being of particular importance in this regard, especially as it heralded the dramatic arrival of several new political parties, i.e. ‘Leefbaar Nederland‘ and ‘Lijst Pim Fortuijn’. Instead of the so-called ‘regenteske’ way of dealing with political matters, there should be more transparency, openness and a greater measure of clarity in the way things are decided and organised. Without the pretension to give an accurate description, we could however describe this process as a ‘peoples movement to achieve more power’. We believe this is also reflected in the planning processes of modern large-scale projects in our countries. With respect to mineral aggregates extraction, we have clearly underestimated the management tasks attached to mineral resources according to Neeb and Dahl (2002). It remains a mystery as to why there is so little attention paid to, or appreciation of, mineral aggregates planning. For a long time little attention was paid to what we now call sustainable development. According to MMSD (2002) ‘in the context of the minerals sector, the goal of sustainable development should be to maximise the contribution to the well being of the current generation in a way that ensures an equitable distribution of its costs and benefits, without reducing the potential for future generations to meet their own needs’. Land use management should recognise competing interests and attempt to negotiate according to an integrated land use planning. We feel that the mineral aggregates are not fully appreciated. European Journal of Spatial Development-http://www.nordregio.se/EJSD/-ISSN 1650-9544- Articles Nov 2003- no 1 3 In this paper we attempt to describe this process from the viewpoint of mineral aggregates extraction, with examples from Great Britain and the Netherlands. We will conclude with a proposal on how to deal with such matters in a different way in future.https://journals.polito.it/index.php/EJSD/article/view/235mineral aggregatesplanningextraction
spellingShingle Bert Van der Moolen
Ian Wilson
Towards a new European Coastal Mineral Aggregates Planning Regime
European Journal of Spatial Development
mineral aggregates
planning
extraction
title Towards a new European Coastal Mineral Aggregates Planning Regime
title_full Towards a new European Coastal Mineral Aggregates Planning Regime
title_fullStr Towards a new European Coastal Mineral Aggregates Planning Regime
title_full_unstemmed Towards a new European Coastal Mineral Aggregates Planning Regime
title_short Towards a new European Coastal Mineral Aggregates Planning Regime
title_sort towards a new european coastal mineral aggregates planning regime
topic mineral aggregates
planning
extraction
url https://journals.polito.it/index.php/EJSD/article/view/235
work_keys_str_mv AT bertvandermoolen towardsaneweuropeancoastalmineralaggregatesplanningregime
AT ianwilson towardsaneweuropeancoastalmineralaggregatesplanningregime