Study the Quality of IMRT and VMAT Treatment Planning Techniques (TPS) Using Indices of Achievement (IOA) Nasopharyngeal Cancer Plans

Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy (VMAT) and Intensity Modulated Radiation Therapy (IMRT) are comparable for nasopharyngeal cancerous radiation therapy. This research intends to analyze the high-quality plan using accomplishment, conformance, and homogeneity criteria. The study involved 40 patient...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Ayat Methaq Khalaf, Basim Khalaf Rejah
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: University of Baghdad 2024-01-01
Series:Ibn Al-Haitham Journal for Pure and Applied Sciences
Subjects:
Online Access:https://jih.uobaghdad.edu.iq/index.php/j/article/view/3277
_version_ 1827377666186018816
author Ayat Methaq Khalaf
Basim Khalaf Rejah
author_facet Ayat Methaq Khalaf
Basim Khalaf Rejah
author_sort Ayat Methaq Khalaf
collection DOAJ
description Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy (VMAT) and Intensity Modulated Radiation Therapy (IMRT) are comparable for nasopharyngeal cancerous radiation therapy. This research intends to analyze the high-quality plan using accomplishment, conformance, and homogeneity criteria. The study involved 40 patients with a postnasal cancerous tumor. The patients underwent computed tomography (CT) simulation to scan the anatomical details of the patients' heads. Then, their data was forwarded to the treatment planning system (TPS) workstation for IMRT and VMAT planning. The plans were evaluated using the IOA, HI, and CI indices. The nasopharynx coverage results consist of the GTV and PTV at 95%. The statistical study reveals that VMAT provides much more coverage than IMRT for 95% GTV and 95% PTV. The results reveal that VMAT has a substantially better-quality plan (IOA) than IMRT. IMRT provides a superior CI, but VMAT protects the cochlea and optic nerves more effectively. In addition, the IMRT is advantageous for the preservation of additional OARs. There is no statistical difference in protection for the mandible and parotid glands between the two procedures. The VMAT has superior coverage for the gross and planned target volumes and achievement indices. The conformity of IMRT in the tumor target area is better, while VMAT can better protect the cochlea and optic nerves.
first_indexed 2024-03-08T12:42:35Z
format Article
id doaj.art-909fea7734fa4bfbb7e7d7d8eed6d57b
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1609-4042
2521-3407
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-08T12:42:35Z
publishDate 2024-01-01
publisher University of Baghdad
record_format Article
series Ibn Al-Haitham Journal for Pure and Applied Sciences
spelling doaj.art-909fea7734fa4bfbb7e7d7d8eed6d57b2024-01-21T07:40:48ZengUniversity of BaghdadIbn Al-Haitham Journal for Pure and Applied Sciences1609-40422521-34072024-01-0137110.30526/37.1.3277Study the Quality of IMRT and VMAT Treatment Planning Techniques (TPS) Using Indices of Achievement (IOA) Nasopharyngeal Cancer PlansAyat Methaq Khalaf0Basim Khalaf Rejah 1Department of Physics, College of Sciences for Women, University of Baghdad, Baghdad, Iraq.Department of Physics, College of Sciences for Women, University of Baghdad, Baghdad, Iraq. Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy (VMAT) and Intensity Modulated Radiation Therapy (IMRT) are comparable for nasopharyngeal cancerous radiation therapy. This research intends to analyze the high-quality plan using accomplishment, conformance, and homogeneity criteria. The study involved 40 patients with a postnasal cancerous tumor. The patients underwent computed tomography (CT) simulation to scan the anatomical details of the patients' heads. Then, their data was forwarded to the treatment planning system (TPS) workstation for IMRT and VMAT planning. The plans were evaluated using the IOA, HI, and CI indices. The nasopharynx coverage results consist of the GTV and PTV at 95%. The statistical study reveals that VMAT provides much more coverage than IMRT for 95% GTV and 95% PTV. The results reveal that VMAT has a substantially better-quality plan (IOA) than IMRT. IMRT provides a superior CI, but VMAT protects the cochlea and optic nerves more effectively. In addition, the IMRT is advantageous for the preservation of additional OARs. There is no statistical difference in protection for the mandible and parotid glands between the two procedures. The VMAT has superior coverage for the gross and planned target volumes and achievement indices. The conformity of IMRT in the tumor target area is better, while VMAT can better protect the cochlea and optic nerves. https://jih.uobaghdad.edu.iq/index.php/j/article/view/3277IMRT, VMAT, Indice of Achievements, Nasopharyngeal, Gross Target Volume
spellingShingle Ayat Methaq Khalaf
Basim Khalaf Rejah
Study the Quality of IMRT and VMAT Treatment Planning Techniques (TPS) Using Indices of Achievement (IOA) Nasopharyngeal Cancer Plans
Ibn Al-Haitham Journal for Pure and Applied Sciences
IMRT, VMAT, Indice of Achievements, Nasopharyngeal, Gross Target Volume
title Study the Quality of IMRT and VMAT Treatment Planning Techniques (TPS) Using Indices of Achievement (IOA) Nasopharyngeal Cancer Plans
title_full Study the Quality of IMRT and VMAT Treatment Planning Techniques (TPS) Using Indices of Achievement (IOA) Nasopharyngeal Cancer Plans
title_fullStr Study the Quality of IMRT and VMAT Treatment Planning Techniques (TPS) Using Indices of Achievement (IOA) Nasopharyngeal Cancer Plans
title_full_unstemmed Study the Quality of IMRT and VMAT Treatment Planning Techniques (TPS) Using Indices of Achievement (IOA) Nasopharyngeal Cancer Plans
title_short Study the Quality of IMRT and VMAT Treatment Planning Techniques (TPS) Using Indices of Achievement (IOA) Nasopharyngeal Cancer Plans
title_sort study the quality of imrt and vmat treatment planning techniques tps using indices of achievement ioa nasopharyngeal cancer plans
topic IMRT, VMAT, Indice of Achievements, Nasopharyngeal, Gross Target Volume
url https://jih.uobaghdad.edu.iq/index.php/j/article/view/3277
work_keys_str_mv AT ayatmethaqkhalaf studythequalityofimrtandvmattreatmentplanningtechniquestpsusingindicesofachievementioanasopharyngealcancerplans
AT basimkhalafrejah studythequalityofimrtandvmattreatmentplanningtechniquestpsusingindicesofachievementioanasopharyngealcancerplans