Development of “guilt” notion

Objective: to study the concept and essence of the institute of guilt in private law, its formation and development, as well as the allocation of stages in the formation of the doctrine of guilt as a precondition of civil liability.Methods: dialectic approach to cognition of social phenomena, enabli...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: V. R. Abdulvagapov
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Tatar Educational Center “Taglimat” Ltd. 2017-12-01
Series:Russian Journal of Economics and Law
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.rusjel.ru/jour/article/view/2097
_version_ 1797255878666092544
author V. R. Abdulvagapov
author_facet V. R. Abdulvagapov
author_sort V. R. Abdulvagapov
collection DOAJ
description Objective: to study the concept and essence of the institute of guilt in private law, its formation and development, as well as the allocation of stages in the formation of the doctrine of guilt as a precondition of civil liability.Methods: dialectic approach to cognition of social phenomena, enabling to analyze them in historical development and functioning in the context of the totality of objective and subjective factors that determined the choice of the following research methods: historical-legal, comparative-legal, systemic, systemic-structural, and formal-legal. Results: the article shows different approaches to the definition of guilt as a condition of civil liability; three periods of the “guilt” concept development are allocated: the Roman period (Roman private law), the pre-revolutionary period (Russian pre-revolutionary law) and the Soviet period (Soviet law). It is proved that the Roman law, by means of cases, managed to develop the basic conceptual apparatus of the institute of private legal liability, as well as principles of determining guilt as a fundamental criterion for such liability. It is proved that the subsequent development of civilisltic science and civil legislation in Russia testifies to the borrowing of the Roman law general principles regarding civil liability, and guilt as its condition. It is shown that in the Soviet period, the civil-legal concept of guilt evolved under the negative attitude to many provisions of the science of private law, developed in the pre-revolutionary period. Analysis of Chapter 25 of the Civil Code of the Russian Federation and, first and foremost, of Article 401 of the Civil Code of the Russian Federation, indicates that both the current state of the civil guilt doctrine and the legal definition of this category are based on the conceptual apparatus developed during many centuries. Scientific novelty: for the first time in the article, basing on the use of complex scientific methods, the concept and essence of the institute of guilt in private law are analyzed; three stages of the guilt doctrine formation are allocated and formed, as a precondition of civil-legal liability.Practical significance: the main provisions and conclusions of the article can be used in research and teaching when addressing the issues of the nature and formation of the “guilt” concept as a precondition of civil-legal liability.
first_indexed 2024-03-08T23:15:34Z
format Article
id doaj.art-90a17f1bfd7f43c188c3c82d7d8346f4
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2782-2923
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-24T22:12:51Z
publishDate 2017-12-01
publisher Tatar Educational Center “Taglimat” Ltd.
record_format Article
series Russian Journal of Economics and Law
spelling doaj.art-90a17f1bfd7f43c188c3c82d7d8346f42024-03-20T08:16:50ZengTatar Educational Center “Taglimat” Ltd.Russian Journal of Economics and Law2782-29232017-12-0111413614510.21202/1993-047X.11.2017.4.136-1452095Development of “guilt” notionV. R. Abdulvagapov0Kazan Innovative University named after V. G. Timiryasov (IEML); “Gazprom Tansgaz Kazan” LtdObjective: to study the concept and essence of the institute of guilt in private law, its formation and development, as well as the allocation of stages in the formation of the doctrine of guilt as a precondition of civil liability.Methods: dialectic approach to cognition of social phenomena, enabling to analyze them in historical development and functioning in the context of the totality of objective and subjective factors that determined the choice of the following research methods: historical-legal, comparative-legal, systemic, systemic-structural, and formal-legal. Results: the article shows different approaches to the definition of guilt as a condition of civil liability; three periods of the “guilt” concept development are allocated: the Roman period (Roman private law), the pre-revolutionary period (Russian pre-revolutionary law) and the Soviet period (Soviet law). It is proved that the Roman law, by means of cases, managed to develop the basic conceptual apparatus of the institute of private legal liability, as well as principles of determining guilt as a fundamental criterion for such liability. It is proved that the subsequent development of civilisltic science and civil legislation in Russia testifies to the borrowing of the Roman law general principles regarding civil liability, and guilt as its condition. It is shown that in the Soviet period, the civil-legal concept of guilt evolved under the negative attitude to many provisions of the science of private law, developed in the pre-revolutionary period. Analysis of Chapter 25 of the Civil Code of the Russian Federation and, first and foremost, of Article 401 of the Civil Code of the Russian Federation, indicates that both the current state of the civil guilt doctrine and the legal definition of this category are based on the conceptual apparatus developed during many centuries. Scientific novelty: for the first time in the article, basing on the use of complex scientific methods, the concept and essence of the institute of guilt in private law are analyzed; three stages of the guilt doctrine formation are allocated and formed, as a precondition of civil-legal liability.Practical significance: the main provisions and conclusions of the article can be used in research and teaching when addressing the issues of the nature and formation of the “guilt” concept as a precondition of civil-legal liability.https://www.rusjel.ru/jour/article/view/2097гражданское праворимское правовинагражданско-правовая ответственность
spellingShingle V. R. Abdulvagapov
Development of “guilt” notion
Russian Journal of Economics and Law
гражданское право
римское право
вина
гражданско-правовая ответственность
title Development of “guilt” notion
title_full Development of “guilt” notion
title_fullStr Development of “guilt” notion
title_full_unstemmed Development of “guilt” notion
title_short Development of “guilt” notion
title_sort development of guilt notion
topic гражданское право
римское право
вина
гражданско-правовая ответственность
url https://www.rusjel.ru/jour/article/view/2097
work_keys_str_mv AT vrabdulvagapov developmentofguiltnotion