Lenvatinib plus sintilimab versus lenvatinib monotherapy as first-line treatment for advanced HBV-related hepatocellular carcinoma: A retrospective, real-world study
Background: The most common type of primary liver cancer is hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), and hepatitis B virus (HBV)-related HCC accounts for many HCC cases and has a high mortality rate. The goal of our study was to investigate the efficacy and safety of lenvatinib plus sintilimab therapy in rea...
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Elsevier
2022-06-01
|
Series: | Heliyon |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S240584402200826X |
_version_ | 1818242058818682880 |
---|---|
author | Lei Zhao Niajia Chang Lei Shi Fengyi Li Fanglin Meng Xiaohui Xie Zhe Xu Fusheng Wang |
author_facet | Lei Zhao Niajia Chang Lei Shi Fengyi Li Fanglin Meng Xiaohui Xie Zhe Xu Fusheng Wang |
author_sort | Lei Zhao |
collection | DOAJ |
description | Background: The most common type of primary liver cancer is hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), and hepatitis B virus (HBV)-related HCC accounts for many HCC cases and has a high mortality rate. The goal of our study was to investigate the efficacy and safety of lenvatinib plus sintilimab therapy in real-world practice and identify factors affecting long-term prognosis. Methods: A retrospective study was conducted with 139 consecutive patients with unresectable HCC treated with lenvatinib or lenvatinib plus sintilimab at the Fifth Medical Center of PLA General Hospital from June 2018 to June 2021. The 139 patients were divided into the control group (85 patients) and the combined treatment group (54 patients) according to the antitumour drugs used for treatment. Efficacy was determined using the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) 1.1 and the HCC-specific modified RECIST (mRECIST) for 139 patients who completed the 1st and second tumour assessments. Safety was evaluated in 60 patients in the combined treatment group and 90 patients in the control group using the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events version 5.0. Results: A total of 139 male Chinese patients (49.6% ≥ 55 years old) were included in the efficacy analysis. The median overall survival in the combined treatment group was 21.7 months, and the median progression-free survival was 11.3 months. According to the mRECIST criteria, the objective response rate was 38.9%, and the disease control rate was 92.6%. The median overall survival (mOS), median progression-free survival (mPFS), overall response rate (ORR) and disease control rate (DCR) in the lenvatinib monotherapy group were 12.8 months, 6.6 months, 24.7%, and 74.1%, respectively. Hypertension was the most common adverse event in both groups. Some immune-related adverse events, such as hypothyroidism (n = 5), elevated blood creatinine (n = 3), elevated cardiac enzymes (n = 1), elevated amylase (n = 1) and increased fasting glucose (n = 1), occurred only in the combined therapy group. Five patients in the lenvatinib monotherapy group and six patients in the lenvatinib plus sintilimab group discontinued therapy due to severe adverse events (AEs) (grade 3). No ≥ 4-grade AEs occurred in any patients. Conclusion: The TKI lenvatinib combined with PD-1-targeted immunotherapy sintilimab is efficacious and safe in real-world practice and may lead to better long-term outcomes than lenvatinib alone. |
first_indexed | 2024-12-12T13:39:12Z |
format | Article |
id | doaj.art-90ac446ff9164580994eabbf84e92111 |
institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
issn | 2405-8440 |
language | English |
last_indexed | 2024-12-12T13:39:12Z |
publishDate | 2022-06-01 |
publisher | Elsevier |
record_format | Article |
series | Heliyon |
spelling | doaj.art-90ac446ff9164580994eabbf84e921112022-12-22T00:22:51ZengElsevierHeliyon2405-84402022-06-0186e09538Lenvatinib plus sintilimab versus lenvatinib monotherapy as first-line treatment for advanced HBV-related hepatocellular carcinoma: A retrospective, real-world studyLei Zhao0Niajia Chang1Lei Shi2Fengyi Li3Fanglin Meng4Xiaohui Xie5Zhe Xu6Fusheng Wang7Medical school of Chinese PLA, Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing, 100853, China; Treatment and Research Center for Infectious Diseases, The Fifth Medical Center of PLA General Hospital, National Clinical Research Center for Infectious Diseases, Beijing, 100039, ChinaThe Second Medical Center of PLA General Hospital, Beijing, 100039, ChinaTreatment and Research Center for Infectious Diseases, The Fifth Medical Center of PLA General Hospital, National Clinical Research Center for Infectious Diseases, Beijing, 100039, ChinaTreatment and Research Center for Infectious Diseases, The Fifth Medical Center of PLA General Hospital, National Clinical Research Center for Infectious Diseases, Beijing, 100039, ChinaTreatment and Research Center for Infectious Diseases, The Fifth Medical Center of PLA General Hospital, National Clinical Research Center for Infectious Diseases, Beijing, 100039, ChinaTreatment and Research Center for Infectious Diseases, The Fifth Medical Center of PLA General Hospital, National Clinical Research Center for Infectious Diseases, Beijing, 100039, ChinaTreatment and Research Center for Infectious Diseases, The Fifth Medical Center of PLA General Hospital, National Clinical Research Center for Infectious Diseases, Beijing, 100039, China; Corresponding author.Treatment and Research Center for Infectious Diseases, The Fifth Medical Center of PLA General Hospital, National Clinical Research Center for Infectious Diseases, Beijing, 100039, China; Corresponding author.Background: The most common type of primary liver cancer is hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), and hepatitis B virus (HBV)-related HCC accounts for many HCC cases and has a high mortality rate. The goal of our study was to investigate the efficacy and safety of lenvatinib plus sintilimab therapy in real-world practice and identify factors affecting long-term prognosis. Methods: A retrospective study was conducted with 139 consecutive patients with unresectable HCC treated with lenvatinib or lenvatinib plus sintilimab at the Fifth Medical Center of PLA General Hospital from June 2018 to June 2021. The 139 patients were divided into the control group (85 patients) and the combined treatment group (54 patients) according to the antitumour drugs used for treatment. Efficacy was determined using the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) 1.1 and the HCC-specific modified RECIST (mRECIST) for 139 patients who completed the 1st and second tumour assessments. Safety was evaluated in 60 patients in the combined treatment group and 90 patients in the control group using the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events version 5.0. Results: A total of 139 male Chinese patients (49.6% ≥ 55 years old) were included in the efficacy analysis. The median overall survival in the combined treatment group was 21.7 months, and the median progression-free survival was 11.3 months. According to the mRECIST criteria, the objective response rate was 38.9%, and the disease control rate was 92.6%. The median overall survival (mOS), median progression-free survival (mPFS), overall response rate (ORR) and disease control rate (DCR) in the lenvatinib monotherapy group were 12.8 months, 6.6 months, 24.7%, and 74.1%, respectively. Hypertension was the most common adverse event in both groups. Some immune-related adverse events, such as hypothyroidism (n = 5), elevated blood creatinine (n = 3), elevated cardiac enzymes (n = 1), elevated amylase (n = 1) and increased fasting glucose (n = 1), occurred only in the combined therapy group. Five patients in the lenvatinib monotherapy group and six patients in the lenvatinib plus sintilimab group discontinued therapy due to severe adverse events (AEs) (grade 3). No ≥ 4-grade AEs occurred in any patients. Conclusion: The TKI lenvatinib combined with PD-1-targeted immunotherapy sintilimab is efficacious and safe in real-world practice and may lead to better long-term outcomes than lenvatinib alone.http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S240584402200826XHBV-related hepatocellular carcinoma (HBV-HCC)Tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI)Immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI)LenvatinibSintilimabMale |
spellingShingle | Lei Zhao Niajia Chang Lei Shi Fengyi Li Fanglin Meng Xiaohui Xie Zhe Xu Fusheng Wang Lenvatinib plus sintilimab versus lenvatinib monotherapy as first-line treatment for advanced HBV-related hepatocellular carcinoma: A retrospective, real-world study Heliyon HBV-related hepatocellular carcinoma (HBV-HCC) Tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) Immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) Lenvatinib Sintilimab Male |
title | Lenvatinib plus sintilimab versus lenvatinib monotherapy as first-line treatment for advanced HBV-related hepatocellular carcinoma: A retrospective, real-world study |
title_full | Lenvatinib plus sintilimab versus lenvatinib monotherapy as first-line treatment for advanced HBV-related hepatocellular carcinoma: A retrospective, real-world study |
title_fullStr | Lenvatinib plus sintilimab versus lenvatinib monotherapy as first-line treatment for advanced HBV-related hepatocellular carcinoma: A retrospective, real-world study |
title_full_unstemmed | Lenvatinib plus sintilimab versus lenvatinib monotherapy as first-line treatment for advanced HBV-related hepatocellular carcinoma: A retrospective, real-world study |
title_short | Lenvatinib plus sintilimab versus lenvatinib monotherapy as first-line treatment for advanced HBV-related hepatocellular carcinoma: A retrospective, real-world study |
title_sort | lenvatinib plus sintilimab versus lenvatinib monotherapy as first line treatment for advanced hbv related hepatocellular carcinoma a retrospective real world study |
topic | HBV-related hepatocellular carcinoma (HBV-HCC) Tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) Immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) Lenvatinib Sintilimab Male |
url | http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S240584402200826X |
work_keys_str_mv | AT leizhao lenvatinibplussintilimabversuslenvatinibmonotherapyasfirstlinetreatmentforadvancedhbvrelatedhepatocellularcarcinomaaretrospectiverealworldstudy AT niajiachang lenvatinibplussintilimabversuslenvatinibmonotherapyasfirstlinetreatmentforadvancedhbvrelatedhepatocellularcarcinomaaretrospectiverealworldstudy AT leishi lenvatinibplussintilimabversuslenvatinibmonotherapyasfirstlinetreatmentforadvancedhbvrelatedhepatocellularcarcinomaaretrospectiverealworldstudy AT fengyili lenvatinibplussintilimabversuslenvatinibmonotherapyasfirstlinetreatmentforadvancedhbvrelatedhepatocellularcarcinomaaretrospectiverealworldstudy AT fanglinmeng lenvatinibplussintilimabversuslenvatinibmonotherapyasfirstlinetreatmentforadvancedhbvrelatedhepatocellularcarcinomaaretrospectiverealworldstudy AT xiaohuixie lenvatinibplussintilimabversuslenvatinibmonotherapyasfirstlinetreatmentforadvancedhbvrelatedhepatocellularcarcinomaaretrospectiverealworldstudy AT zhexu lenvatinibplussintilimabversuslenvatinibmonotherapyasfirstlinetreatmentforadvancedhbvrelatedhepatocellularcarcinomaaretrospectiverealworldstudy AT fushengwang lenvatinibplussintilimabversuslenvatinibmonotherapyasfirstlinetreatmentforadvancedhbvrelatedhepatocellularcarcinomaaretrospectiverealworldstudy |