Accurate Calibration and Uncertainty Estimation of the Normal Spring Constant of Various AFM Cantilevers

Measurement of force on a micro- or nano-Newton scale is important when exploring the mechanical properties of materials in the biophysics and nanomechanical fields. The atomic force microscope (AFM) is widely used in microforce measurement. The cantilever probe works as an AFM force sensor, and the...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Yunpeng Song, Sen Wu, Linyan Xu, Xing Fu
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2015-03-01
Series:Sensors
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.mdpi.com/1424-8220/15/3/5865
_version_ 1828114088680488960
author Yunpeng Song
Sen Wu
Linyan Xu
Xing Fu
author_facet Yunpeng Song
Sen Wu
Linyan Xu
Xing Fu
author_sort Yunpeng Song
collection DOAJ
description Measurement of force on a micro- or nano-Newton scale is important when exploring the mechanical properties of materials in the biophysics and nanomechanical fields. The atomic force microscope (AFM) is widely used in microforce measurement. The cantilever probe works as an AFM force sensor, and the spring constant of the cantilever is of great significance to the accuracy of the measurement results. This paper presents a normal spring constant calibration method with the combined use of an electromagnetic balance and a homemade AFM head. When the cantilever presses the balance, its deflection is detected through an optical lever integrated in the AFM head. Meanwhile, the corresponding bending force is recorded by the balance. Then the spring constant can be simply calculated using Hooke’s law. During the calibration, a feedback loop is applied to control the deflection of the cantilever. Errors that may affect the stability of the cantilever could be compensated rapidly. Five types of commercial cantilevers with different shapes, stiffness, and operating modes were chosen to evaluate the performance of our system. Based on the uncertainty analysis, the expanded relative standard uncertainties of the normal spring constant of most measured cantilevers are believed to be better than 2%.
first_indexed 2024-04-11T12:19:29Z
format Article
id doaj.art-90b6ad8701e34c658e7a7f286d6702c7
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1424-8220
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-11T12:19:29Z
publishDate 2015-03-01
publisher MDPI AG
record_format Article
series Sensors
spelling doaj.art-90b6ad8701e34c658e7a7f286d6702c72022-12-22T04:24:08ZengMDPI AGSensors1424-82202015-03-011535865588310.3390/s150305865s150305865Accurate Calibration and Uncertainty Estimation of the Normal Spring Constant of Various AFM CantileversYunpeng Song0Sen Wu1Linyan Xu2Xing Fu3State Key Laboratory of Precision Measuring Technology and Instruments, Tianjin University, Tianjin 300072, ChinaState Key Laboratory of Precision Measuring Technology and Instruments, Tianjin University, Tianjin 300072, ChinaState Key Laboratory of Precision Measuring Technology and Instruments, Tianjin University, Tianjin 300072, ChinaState Key Laboratory of Precision Measuring Technology and Instruments, Tianjin University, Tianjin 300072, ChinaMeasurement of force on a micro- or nano-Newton scale is important when exploring the mechanical properties of materials in the biophysics and nanomechanical fields. The atomic force microscope (AFM) is widely used in microforce measurement. The cantilever probe works as an AFM force sensor, and the spring constant of the cantilever is of great significance to the accuracy of the measurement results. This paper presents a normal spring constant calibration method with the combined use of an electromagnetic balance and a homemade AFM head. When the cantilever presses the balance, its deflection is detected through an optical lever integrated in the AFM head. Meanwhile, the corresponding bending force is recorded by the balance. Then the spring constant can be simply calculated using Hooke’s law. During the calibration, a feedback loop is applied to control the deflection of the cantilever. Errors that may affect the stability of the cantilever could be compensated rapidly. Five types of commercial cantilevers with different shapes, stiffness, and operating modes were chosen to evaluate the performance of our system. Based on the uncertainty analysis, the expanded relative standard uncertainties of the normal spring constant of most measured cantilevers are believed to be better than 2%.http://www.mdpi.com/1424-8220/15/3/5865AFM cantilevernormal spring constantcalibrationbalanceuncertainty estimation
spellingShingle Yunpeng Song
Sen Wu
Linyan Xu
Xing Fu
Accurate Calibration and Uncertainty Estimation of the Normal Spring Constant of Various AFM Cantilevers
Sensors
AFM cantilever
normal spring constant
calibration
balance
uncertainty estimation
title Accurate Calibration and Uncertainty Estimation of the Normal Spring Constant of Various AFM Cantilevers
title_full Accurate Calibration and Uncertainty Estimation of the Normal Spring Constant of Various AFM Cantilevers
title_fullStr Accurate Calibration and Uncertainty Estimation of the Normal Spring Constant of Various AFM Cantilevers
title_full_unstemmed Accurate Calibration and Uncertainty Estimation of the Normal Spring Constant of Various AFM Cantilevers
title_short Accurate Calibration and Uncertainty Estimation of the Normal Spring Constant of Various AFM Cantilevers
title_sort accurate calibration and uncertainty estimation of the normal spring constant of various afm cantilevers
topic AFM cantilever
normal spring constant
calibration
balance
uncertainty estimation
url http://www.mdpi.com/1424-8220/15/3/5865
work_keys_str_mv AT yunpengsong accuratecalibrationanduncertaintyestimationofthenormalspringconstantofvariousafmcantilevers
AT senwu accuratecalibrationanduncertaintyestimationofthenormalspringconstantofvariousafmcantilevers
AT linyanxu accuratecalibrationanduncertaintyestimationofthenormalspringconstantofvariousafmcantilevers
AT xingfu accuratecalibrationanduncertaintyestimationofthenormalspringconstantofvariousafmcantilevers