Evaluating the distribution of research in radiation sciences as published in general medical physics journals

Introduction: The aim of this study was to evaluate the distribution and trends of studies in different areas of medical physics science. This assessment can reflect the past and current status of the field, and it can also predict the future of this science. Material and method: In this study, 4630...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Banafsheh Zeinali-Rafsanjani, Mohammad Amin Mosleh-Shirazi, Mahdi Saeedi-Moghadam, Sepideh Sefidbakht
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: SpringerOpen 2018-12-01
Series:The Egyptian Journal of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine
Online Access:http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378603X18301645
_version_ 1811289351121797120
author Banafsheh Zeinali-Rafsanjani
Mohammad Amin Mosleh-Shirazi
Mahdi Saeedi-Moghadam
Sepideh Sefidbakht
author_facet Banafsheh Zeinali-Rafsanjani
Mohammad Amin Mosleh-Shirazi
Mahdi Saeedi-Moghadam
Sepideh Sefidbakht
author_sort Banafsheh Zeinali-Rafsanjani
collection DOAJ
description Introduction: The aim of this study was to evaluate the distribution and trends of studies in different areas of medical physics science. This assessment can reflect the past and current status of the field, and it can also predict the future of this science. Material and method: In this study, 4630 articles from 3 ISI journals and 1 PubMed indexed journal from 2010 to 2015 were investigated to find the statistics of medical radiation science field studies. Results: Results revealed that almost 70% of articles were about radiation oncology physics (37.7%) and medical imaging (31.1%). In radiation oncology field most of the studies were respectively about dosimetry (21.9%), imaging in radiotherapy (20.3%) and IMRT (12.9%) and in medical imaging field, most of the studies were about nuclear medicine (32.3%), CT (29%) and MRI (16.4%). The least number of studies were about radiobiology/radiation protection (1.3%) and non-ionizing topics (3.5%). Conclusion: According to the results, radiation oncology physics and medical imaging were the most popular issues among medical physicists. This study suggests that more attention should be given to non-ionizing radiation topics, radiobiology, and radiation protection. Keywords: Radiation sciences, Research distribution, Research policy, Trend
first_indexed 2024-04-13T03:53:21Z
format Article
id doaj.art-90c3f5879f914cfd8b16f77714ee7ed7
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 0378-603X
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-13T03:53:21Z
publishDate 2018-12-01
publisher SpringerOpen
record_format Article
series The Egyptian Journal of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine
spelling doaj.art-90c3f5879f914cfd8b16f77714ee7ed72022-12-22T03:03:44ZengSpringerOpenThe Egyptian Journal of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine0378-603X2018-12-0149411191124Evaluating the distribution of research in radiation sciences as published in general medical physics journalsBanafsheh Zeinali-Rafsanjani0Mohammad Amin Mosleh-Shirazi1Mahdi Saeedi-Moghadam2Sepideh Sefidbakht3Medical Imaging Research Center, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, IranMedical Imaging Research Center, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, IranCorresponding author.; Medical Imaging Research Center, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, IranMedical Imaging Research Center, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, IranIntroduction: The aim of this study was to evaluate the distribution and trends of studies in different areas of medical physics science. This assessment can reflect the past and current status of the field, and it can also predict the future of this science. Material and method: In this study, 4630 articles from 3 ISI journals and 1 PubMed indexed journal from 2010 to 2015 were investigated to find the statistics of medical radiation science field studies. Results: Results revealed that almost 70% of articles were about radiation oncology physics (37.7%) and medical imaging (31.1%). In radiation oncology field most of the studies were respectively about dosimetry (21.9%), imaging in radiotherapy (20.3%) and IMRT (12.9%) and in medical imaging field, most of the studies were about nuclear medicine (32.3%), CT (29%) and MRI (16.4%). The least number of studies were about radiobiology/radiation protection (1.3%) and non-ionizing topics (3.5%). Conclusion: According to the results, radiation oncology physics and medical imaging were the most popular issues among medical physicists. This study suggests that more attention should be given to non-ionizing radiation topics, radiobiology, and radiation protection. Keywords: Radiation sciences, Research distribution, Research policy, Trendhttp://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378603X18301645
spellingShingle Banafsheh Zeinali-Rafsanjani
Mohammad Amin Mosleh-Shirazi
Mahdi Saeedi-Moghadam
Sepideh Sefidbakht
Evaluating the distribution of research in radiation sciences as published in general medical physics journals
The Egyptian Journal of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine
title Evaluating the distribution of research in radiation sciences as published in general medical physics journals
title_full Evaluating the distribution of research in radiation sciences as published in general medical physics journals
title_fullStr Evaluating the distribution of research in radiation sciences as published in general medical physics journals
title_full_unstemmed Evaluating the distribution of research in radiation sciences as published in general medical physics journals
title_short Evaluating the distribution of research in radiation sciences as published in general medical physics journals
title_sort evaluating the distribution of research in radiation sciences as published in general medical physics journals
url http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378603X18301645
work_keys_str_mv AT banafshehzeinalirafsanjani evaluatingthedistributionofresearchinradiationsciencesaspublishedingeneralmedicalphysicsjournals
AT mohammadaminmoslehshirazi evaluatingthedistributionofresearchinradiationsciencesaspublishedingeneralmedicalphysicsjournals
AT mahdisaeedimoghadam evaluatingthedistributionofresearchinradiationsciencesaspublishedingeneralmedicalphysicsjournals
AT sepidehsefidbakht evaluatingthedistributionofresearchinradiationsciencesaspublishedingeneralmedicalphysicsjournals