Information-processing in French Adults Practicing Deception

Background. Experiences which people have and perceive personally (Skowronski et al., 1991) are interpreted in a subjective way (Weiss & Cropanzano, 1996) and stored in autobiographical memory along with information related to their lifetime periods, general events, and event-specific knowledge...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Gabriella Fekete
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: M.V. Lomonosov Moscow State University 2019-03-01
Series:Psychology in Russia: State of Art
Subjects:
Online Access:http://psychologyinrussia.com/volumes/pdf/2019_1/psych_1_2019_3_Fekete.pdf
_version_ 1811207362474672128
author Gabriella Fekete
author_facet Gabriella Fekete
author_sort Gabriella Fekete
collection DOAJ
description Background. Experiences which people have and perceive personally (Skowronski et al., 1991) are interpreted in a subjective way (Weiss & Cropanzano, 1996) and stored in autobiographical memory along with information related to their lifetime periods, general events, and event-specific knowledge (Conway & Pleydell-Pearce, 2000; Larsen & Thompson, 1995). These three specific knowledge-types are intertwined and come up together when an individual is recalling memories (Conway, 1996). Objective. The aim of our study is to investigate how French adults process information in deceptive speech. We observed the information-types used in the three knowledge-types of autobiographical memory in monologs and answers to questions. Method. Our data comes from videotaped spontaneous oral speeches produced by 17 French adults. The participants were given the task of producing a fake opinion paradigm on their favorite sport. Result. Our results show discrepancies in the frequency of the three knowledge-types of autobiographical memory used in the true and deceptive speech of practitioners and viewers. We also found that certain informationtypes are linguistic-context-dependent while others are systemic. The findings highlight the fact that some information is missing and/or replaced, and other information is nuanced in deception compared to truthful speech. Conclusion. This study can contribute to a better understanding of deceivers’ cognitive processing, as well as demonstrating the close relationship between language and cognition.
first_indexed 2024-04-12T04:03:02Z
format Article
id doaj.art-90c67dcf49004ea8ad2fd48955c0d23f
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2074-6857
2307-2202
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-12T04:03:02Z
publishDate 2019-03-01
publisher M.V. Lomonosov Moscow State University
record_format Article
series Psychology in Russia: State of Art
spelling doaj.art-90c67dcf49004ea8ad2fd48955c0d23f2022-12-22T03:48:40ZengM.V. Lomonosov Moscow State UniversityPsychology in Russia: State of Art2074-68572307-22022019-03-01121314810.11621/pir.2019.0103Information-processing in French Adults Practicing DeceptionGabriella Fekete0Laboratoire Dynamique du Langage, Université de Lyon, FranceBackground. Experiences which people have and perceive personally (Skowronski et al., 1991) are interpreted in a subjective way (Weiss & Cropanzano, 1996) and stored in autobiographical memory along with information related to their lifetime periods, general events, and event-specific knowledge (Conway & Pleydell-Pearce, 2000; Larsen & Thompson, 1995). These three specific knowledge-types are intertwined and come up together when an individual is recalling memories (Conway, 1996). Objective. The aim of our study is to investigate how French adults process information in deceptive speech. We observed the information-types used in the three knowledge-types of autobiographical memory in monologs and answers to questions. Method. Our data comes from videotaped spontaneous oral speeches produced by 17 French adults. The participants were given the task of producing a fake opinion paradigm on their favorite sport. Result. Our results show discrepancies in the frequency of the three knowledge-types of autobiographical memory used in the true and deceptive speech of practitioners and viewers. We also found that certain informationtypes are linguistic-context-dependent while others are systemic. The findings highlight the fact that some information is missing and/or replaced, and other information is nuanced in deception compared to truthful speech. Conclusion. This study can contribute to a better understanding of deceivers’ cognitive processing, as well as demonstrating the close relationship between language and cognition.http://psychologyinrussia.com/volumes/pdf/2019_1/psych_1_2019_3_Fekete.pdfdeceptioninformationprocessingknowledge-types of autobiographical memorymonologquestioning
spellingShingle Gabriella Fekete
Information-processing in French Adults Practicing Deception
Psychology in Russia: State of Art
deception
informationprocessing
knowledge-types of autobiographical memory
monolog
questioning
title Information-processing in French Adults Practicing Deception
title_full Information-processing in French Adults Practicing Deception
title_fullStr Information-processing in French Adults Practicing Deception
title_full_unstemmed Information-processing in French Adults Practicing Deception
title_short Information-processing in French Adults Practicing Deception
title_sort information processing in french adults practicing deception
topic deception
informationprocessing
knowledge-types of autobiographical memory
monolog
questioning
url http://psychologyinrussia.com/volumes/pdf/2019_1/psych_1_2019_3_Fekete.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT gabriellafekete informationprocessinginfrenchadultspracticingdeception