Peribulbar anesthesia in 750 patients treated with oral anticoagulants

<b>AIM:</b> To check the safety of continuation of oral anticoagulants in ophthalmic procedures requiring a peribulbar anesthesia.<b>METHOD:</b>A prospective case control study included 750 patients with oral anticoagulants in group A and 750 patients who had never been treat...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Emile Calenda, Olivier Genevois, Annie Cardon, Marc Muraine
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Press of International Journal of Ophthalmology (IJO PRESS) 2014-02-01
Series:International Journal of Ophthalmology
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3949469/
Description
Summary:<b>AIM:</b> To check the safety of continuation of oral anticoagulants in ophthalmic procedures requiring a peribulbar anesthesia.<b>METHOD:</b>A prospective case control study included 750 patients with oral anticoagulants in group A and 750 patients who had never been treated with oral anticoagulant in group B. Hemorrhages were graded as follows:1) spot ecchymosis of eyelid and or subconjunctival hemorrhage; 2) eyelid ecchymosis involving half of the lid surface area; 3) eyelid ecchymosis all around the eye, no increase in intraocular pressure; 4) retrobulbar hemorrhage with increased intraocular pressure.<b>RESULTS:</b> In group A, grade 1 was observed in 13 patients (1.74%) and grade 2 in 2 patients (0.26%). In group B, grade 1 was observed in 12 patients (1.6%) and grade 2 was absent. No 3 or 4 hemorrhage grade was encountered in both groups. There was not significant difference in grade 1 hemorrhage between both groups (<i>P</i>=0.21).<b>CONCLUSION:</b>Oral anticoagulants were not associated with a significant increase in potentially sight-threatening local anesthetic complications.
ISSN:2222-3959
2227-4898