Peribulbar anesthesia in 750 patients treated with oral anticoagulants

<b>AIM:</b> To check the safety of continuation of oral anticoagulants in ophthalmic procedures requiring a peribulbar anesthesia.<b>METHOD:</b>A prospective case control study included 750 patients with oral anticoagulants in group A and 750 patients who had never been treat...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Emile Calenda, Olivier Genevois, Annie Cardon, Marc Muraine
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Press of International Journal of Ophthalmology (IJO PRESS) 2014-02-01
Series:International Journal of Ophthalmology
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3949469/
_version_ 1818215393153515520
author Emile Calenda
Olivier Genevois
Annie Cardon
Marc Muraine
author_facet Emile Calenda
Olivier Genevois
Annie Cardon
Marc Muraine
author_sort Emile Calenda
collection DOAJ
description <b>AIM:</b> To check the safety of continuation of oral anticoagulants in ophthalmic procedures requiring a peribulbar anesthesia.<b>METHOD:</b>A prospective case control study included 750 patients with oral anticoagulants in group A and 750 patients who had never been treated with oral anticoagulant in group B. Hemorrhages were graded as follows:1) spot ecchymosis of eyelid and or subconjunctival hemorrhage; 2) eyelid ecchymosis involving half of the lid surface area; 3) eyelid ecchymosis all around the eye, no increase in intraocular pressure; 4) retrobulbar hemorrhage with increased intraocular pressure.<b>RESULTS:</b> In group A, grade 1 was observed in 13 patients (1.74%) and grade 2 in 2 patients (0.26%). In group B, grade 1 was observed in 12 patients (1.6%) and grade 2 was absent. No 3 or 4 hemorrhage grade was encountered in both groups. There was not significant difference in grade 1 hemorrhage between both groups (<i>P</i>=0.21).<b>CONCLUSION:</b>Oral anticoagulants were not associated with a significant increase in potentially sight-threatening local anesthetic complications.
first_indexed 2024-12-12T06:35:22Z
format Article
id doaj.art-90e38548da794836b8cc5faf668cdb0a
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2222-3959
2227-4898
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-12T06:35:22Z
publishDate 2014-02-01
publisher Press of International Journal of Ophthalmology (IJO PRESS)
record_format Article
series International Journal of Ophthalmology
spelling doaj.art-90e38548da794836b8cc5faf668cdb0a2022-12-22T00:34:28ZengPress of International Journal of Ophthalmology (IJO PRESS)International Journal of Ophthalmology2222-39592227-48982014-02-017111011310.3980/j.issn.2222-3959.2014.01.20Peribulbar anesthesia in 750 patients treated with oral anticoagulantsEmile Calenda0Olivier Genevois1Annie Cardon2Marc Muraine3Department of Anesthesia, Rouen University Hospital, 1 rue de Germont, Rouen cedex 76031, France<br>Department of Ophthalmology, Rouen University Hospital, 1 rue de Germont, Rouen cedex 76031, FranceDepartment of Anesthesia, Rouen University Hospital, 1 rue de Germont, Rouen cedex 76031, France<br>Department of Ophthalmology, Rouen University Hospital, 1 rue de Germont, Rouen cedex 76031, France<b>AIM:</b> To check the safety of continuation of oral anticoagulants in ophthalmic procedures requiring a peribulbar anesthesia.<b>METHOD:</b>A prospective case control study included 750 patients with oral anticoagulants in group A and 750 patients who had never been treated with oral anticoagulant in group B. Hemorrhages were graded as follows:1) spot ecchymosis of eyelid and or subconjunctival hemorrhage; 2) eyelid ecchymosis involving half of the lid surface area; 3) eyelid ecchymosis all around the eye, no increase in intraocular pressure; 4) retrobulbar hemorrhage with increased intraocular pressure.<b>RESULTS:</b> In group A, grade 1 was observed in 13 patients (1.74%) and grade 2 in 2 patients (0.26%). In group B, grade 1 was observed in 12 patients (1.6%) and grade 2 was absent. No 3 or 4 hemorrhage grade was encountered in both groups. There was not significant difference in grade 1 hemorrhage between both groups (<i>P</i>=0.21).<b>CONCLUSION:</b>Oral anticoagulants were not associated with a significant increase in potentially sight-threatening local anesthetic complications.http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3949469/oral anticoagulantseye procedurehemorrhageperibulbar blockperibulbar block
spellingShingle Emile Calenda
Olivier Genevois
Annie Cardon
Marc Muraine
Peribulbar anesthesia in 750 patients treated with oral anticoagulants
International Journal of Ophthalmology
oral anticoagulants
eye procedure
hemorrhage
peribulbar block
peribulbar block
title Peribulbar anesthesia in 750 patients treated with oral anticoagulants
title_full Peribulbar anesthesia in 750 patients treated with oral anticoagulants
title_fullStr Peribulbar anesthesia in 750 patients treated with oral anticoagulants
title_full_unstemmed Peribulbar anesthesia in 750 patients treated with oral anticoagulants
title_short Peribulbar anesthesia in 750 patients treated with oral anticoagulants
title_sort peribulbar anesthesia in 750 patients treated with oral anticoagulants
topic oral anticoagulants
eye procedure
hemorrhage
peribulbar block
peribulbar block
url http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3949469/
work_keys_str_mv AT emilecalenda peribulbaranesthesiain750patientstreatedwithoralanticoagulants
AT oliviergenevois peribulbaranesthesiain750patientstreatedwithoralanticoagulants
AT anniecardon peribulbaranesthesiain750patientstreatedwithoralanticoagulants
AT marcmuraine peribulbaranesthesiain750patientstreatedwithoralanticoagulants