A Scientometric Review of Alexithymia: Mapping Thematic and Disciplinary Shifts in Half a Century of Research

The term “alexithymia” was introduced in the lexicon of psychiatry in the early ‘70s by Sifneos to outline the difficulties manifested by some patients in identifying and describing their own emotions. Since then, the construct has been broadened and partially modified. Today this describes a condit...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Giulia Gaggero, Andrea Bonassi, Sara Dellantonio, Luigi Pastore, Vahid Aryadoust, Gianluca Esposito
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Frontiers Media S.A. 2020-12-01
Series:Frontiers in Psychiatry
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpsyt.2020.611489/full
_version_ 1818844824123473920
author Giulia Gaggero
Andrea Bonassi
Andrea Bonassi
Sara Dellantonio
Luigi Pastore
Vahid Aryadoust
Gianluca Esposito
Gianluca Esposito
Gianluca Esposito
author_facet Giulia Gaggero
Andrea Bonassi
Andrea Bonassi
Sara Dellantonio
Luigi Pastore
Vahid Aryadoust
Gianluca Esposito
Gianluca Esposito
Gianluca Esposito
author_sort Giulia Gaggero
collection DOAJ
description The term “alexithymia” was introduced in the lexicon of psychiatry in the early ‘70s by Sifneos to outline the difficulties manifested by some patients in identifying and describing their own emotions. Since then, the construct has been broadened and partially modified. Today this describes a condition characterized by an altered emotional awareness which leads to difficulties in recognizing your own and others' emotions. In half a century, the volume of scientific products focusing on alexithymia has exceeded 5,000. Such an expansive knowledge domain poses a difficulty for those willing to understand how alexithymia research has developed. Scientometrics embodies a solution to this issue, employing computational, and visual analytic methods to uncover meaningful patterns within large bibliographical corpora. In this study, we used the CiteSpace software to examine a corpus of 4,930 publications on alexithymia ranging from 1980 to 2020 and their 100,251 references included in Web of Science. Document co-citation analysis was performed to highlight pivotal publications and major research areas on alexithymia, whereas journal co-citation analysis was conducted to find the related editorial venues and disciplinary communities. The analyses suggest that the construct of alexithymia experienced a gradual thematic and disciplinary shift. Although the first conceptualization of alexithymia came from psychoanalysis and psychosomatics, empirical research was pushed by the operationalization of the construct formulated at the end of the ‘80s. Specifically, the development of the Toronto Alexithymia Scale, currently the most used self-report instrument, seems to have encouraged both the entrance of new disciplines in the study of alexithymia (i.e., cognitive science and neuroscience) and an implicit redefinition of its conceptual nucleus. Overall, we discuss opportunities and limitations in the application of this bottom-up approach, which highlights trends in alexithymia research that were previously identified only through a qualitative, theory-driven approach.
first_indexed 2024-12-19T05:19:54Z
format Article
id doaj.art-90e499ebb9564d4593347a2bcca610ff
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1664-0640
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-19T05:19:54Z
publishDate 2020-12-01
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format Article
series Frontiers in Psychiatry
spelling doaj.art-90e499ebb9564d4593347a2bcca610ff2022-12-21T20:34:31ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Psychiatry1664-06402020-12-011110.3389/fpsyt.2020.611489611489A Scientometric Review of Alexithymia: Mapping Thematic and Disciplinary Shifts in Half a Century of ResearchGiulia Gaggero0Andrea Bonassi1Andrea Bonassi2Sara Dellantonio3Luigi Pastore4Vahid Aryadoust5Gianluca Esposito6Gianluca Esposito7Gianluca Esposito8Department of Psychology and Cognitive Science, University of Trento, Rovereto, ItalyDepartment of Psychology and Cognitive Science, University of Trento, Rovereto, ItalyMobile and Social Computing Lab, Bruno Kessler Foundation, Trento, ItalyDepartment of Psychology and Cognitive Science, University of Trento, Rovereto, ItalyDepartment of Education, Psychology, Communication, University of Bari, Bari, ItalyNational Institute of Education, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore, SingaporeDepartment of Psychology and Cognitive Science, University of Trento, Rovereto, ItalyPsychology Program, School of Social Sciences, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore, SingaporeLee Kong Chian School of Medicine, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore, SingaporeThe term “alexithymia” was introduced in the lexicon of psychiatry in the early ‘70s by Sifneos to outline the difficulties manifested by some patients in identifying and describing their own emotions. Since then, the construct has been broadened and partially modified. Today this describes a condition characterized by an altered emotional awareness which leads to difficulties in recognizing your own and others' emotions. In half a century, the volume of scientific products focusing on alexithymia has exceeded 5,000. Such an expansive knowledge domain poses a difficulty for those willing to understand how alexithymia research has developed. Scientometrics embodies a solution to this issue, employing computational, and visual analytic methods to uncover meaningful patterns within large bibliographical corpora. In this study, we used the CiteSpace software to examine a corpus of 4,930 publications on alexithymia ranging from 1980 to 2020 and their 100,251 references included in Web of Science. Document co-citation analysis was performed to highlight pivotal publications and major research areas on alexithymia, whereas journal co-citation analysis was conducted to find the related editorial venues and disciplinary communities. The analyses suggest that the construct of alexithymia experienced a gradual thematic and disciplinary shift. Although the first conceptualization of alexithymia came from psychoanalysis and psychosomatics, empirical research was pushed by the operationalization of the construct formulated at the end of the ‘80s. Specifically, the development of the Toronto Alexithymia Scale, currently the most used self-report instrument, seems to have encouraged both the entrance of new disciplines in the study of alexithymia (i.e., cognitive science and neuroscience) and an implicit redefinition of its conceptual nucleus. Overall, we discuss opportunities and limitations in the application of this bottom-up approach, which highlights trends in alexithymia research that were previously identified only through a qualitative, theory-driven approach.https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpsyt.2020.611489/fullalexithymiaco-citation analysisaffect regulationscience mappingcitespacesystematic review
spellingShingle Giulia Gaggero
Andrea Bonassi
Andrea Bonassi
Sara Dellantonio
Luigi Pastore
Vahid Aryadoust
Gianluca Esposito
Gianluca Esposito
Gianluca Esposito
A Scientometric Review of Alexithymia: Mapping Thematic and Disciplinary Shifts in Half a Century of Research
Frontiers in Psychiatry
alexithymia
co-citation analysis
affect regulation
science mapping
citespace
systematic review
title A Scientometric Review of Alexithymia: Mapping Thematic and Disciplinary Shifts in Half a Century of Research
title_full A Scientometric Review of Alexithymia: Mapping Thematic and Disciplinary Shifts in Half a Century of Research
title_fullStr A Scientometric Review of Alexithymia: Mapping Thematic and Disciplinary Shifts in Half a Century of Research
title_full_unstemmed A Scientometric Review of Alexithymia: Mapping Thematic and Disciplinary Shifts in Half a Century of Research
title_short A Scientometric Review of Alexithymia: Mapping Thematic and Disciplinary Shifts in Half a Century of Research
title_sort scientometric review of alexithymia mapping thematic and disciplinary shifts in half a century of research
topic alexithymia
co-citation analysis
affect regulation
science mapping
citespace
systematic review
url https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpsyt.2020.611489/full
work_keys_str_mv AT giuliagaggero ascientometricreviewofalexithymiamappingthematicanddisciplinaryshiftsinhalfacenturyofresearch
AT andreabonassi ascientometricreviewofalexithymiamappingthematicanddisciplinaryshiftsinhalfacenturyofresearch
AT andreabonassi ascientometricreviewofalexithymiamappingthematicanddisciplinaryshiftsinhalfacenturyofresearch
AT saradellantonio ascientometricreviewofalexithymiamappingthematicanddisciplinaryshiftsinhalfacenturyofresearch
AT luigipastore ascientometricreviewofalexithymiamappingthematicanddisciplinaryshiftsinhalfacenturyofresearch
AT vahidaryadoust ascientometricreviewofalexithymiamappingthematicanddisciplinaryshiftsinhalfacenturyofresearch
AT gianlucaesposito ascientometricreviewofalexithymiamappingthematicanddisciplinaryshiftsinhalfacenturyofresearch
AT gianlucaesposito ascientometricreviewofalexithymiamappingthematicanddisciplinaryshiftsinhalfacenturyofresearch
AT gianlucaesposito ascientometricreviewofalexithymiamappingthematicanddisciplinaryshiftsinhalfacenturyofresearch
AT giuliagaggero scientometricreviewofalexithymiamappingthematicanddisciplinaryshiftsinhalfacenturyofresearch
AT andreabonassi scientometricreviewofalexithymiamappingthematicanddisciplinaryshiftsinhalfacenturyofresearch
AT andreabonassi scientometricreviewofalexithymiamappingthematicanddisciplinaryshiftsinhalfacenturyofresearch
AT saradellantonio scientometricreviewofalexithymiamappingthematicanddisciplinaryshiftsinhalfacenturyofresearch
AT luigipastore scientometricreviewofalexithymiamappingthematicanddisciplinaryshiftsinhalfacenturyofresearch
AT vahidaryadoust scientometricreviewofalexithymiamappingthematicanddisciplinaryshiftsinhalfacenturyofresearch
AT gianlucaesposito scientometricreviewofalexithymiamappingthematicanddisciplinaryshiftsinhalfacenturyofresearch
AT gianlucaesposito scientometricreviewofalexithymiamappingthematicanddisciplinaryshiftsinhalfacenturyofresearch
AT gianlucaesposito scientometricreviewofalexithymiamappingthematicanddisciplinaryshiftsinhalfacenturyofresearch