Lozomieh in Ibn Sina’s Logic and its Relation to Various Kinds of Conditionals in Modern Logic with Analysis and Critique of Some Views

According to Ibn Sina's logic, Lozomieh is the only conditional that is suitable to be named real conditional. Also Lozomieh is among the foundations of Ibn Sina’s logic that the rules Modus Ponens and Modus Tollens would be applied only to it. Analyzing the relation between premises and conc...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: M Hajihosseini
Format: Article
Language:fas
Published: University of Isfahan 2011-09-01
Series:Metaphysics
Subjects:
Online Access:http://uijs.ui.ac.ir/mph/browse.php?a_code=A-10-1-31&slc_lang=en&sid=1
_version_ 1797973005671858176
author M Hajihosseini
author_facet M Hajihosseini
author_sort M Hajihosseini
collection DOAJ
description According to Ibn Sina's logic, Lozomieh is the only conditional that is suitable to be named real conditional. Also Lozomieh is among the foundations of Ibn Sina’s logic that the rules Modus Ponens and Modus Tollens would be applied only to it. Analyzing the relation between premises and conclusion in various kinds of syllogism in ancient Logic shows the importance of Lozomieh too. After providing the truth conditions of Lozomieh, the central aim of the present article is to review different views about Lozomieh and its relation to various kinds of conditionals in Modern logic. These views are as follows: Some believe that Lozomieh is different from strict implication. Some believe Lozomieh is nearer to entailment than other kinds of implications. Some believe that Lozomieh has to be interpreted as relevant. And some believe that the definition of strict implication made by Lewis is the same as the definition of Lozomieh made by Abhary. Finally, after analyzing and criticizing these views, we want to bring to light the fact that to find the relation between Lozomieh and those of conditionals in modern Logic we have to compare all aspects of the paradigms of ancient logic and Modern logic. In addition, since the author believes that the material implication is absent in ancient logic and ancient logic is similar to relevant logic in many aspects, we have to compare the ancient logic as a paradigm to a kind of relevant logic that is substitution for material implication logic as another paradigm.
first_indexed 2024-04-11T03:57:34Z
format Article
id doaj.art-91019dc2d46e4ea793aad0e6e31378ca
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2008-8086
2476-3276
language fas
last_indexed 2024-04-11T03:57:34Z
publishDate 2011-09-01
publisher University of Isfahan
record_format Article
series Metaphysics
spelling doaj.art-91019dc2d46e4ea793aad0e6e31378ca2023-01-02T00:15:16ZfasUniversity of IsfahanMetaphysics2008-80862476-32762011-09-01394764Lozomieh in Ibn Sina’s Logic and its Relation to Various Kinds of Conditionals in Modern Logic with Analysis and Critique of Some ViewsM Hajihosseini0 University of esfahan According to Ibn Sina's logic, Lozomieh is the only conditional that is suitable to be named real conditional. Also Lozomieh is among the foundations of Ibn Sina’s logic that the rules Modus Ponens and Modus Tollens would be applied only to it. Analyzing the relation between premises and conclusion in various kinds of syllogism in ancient Logic shows the importance of Lozomieh too. After providing the truth conditions of Lozomieh, the central aim of the present article is to review different views about Lozomieh and its relation to various kinds of conditionals in Modern logic. These views are as follows: Some believe that Lozomieh is different from strict implication. Some believe Lozomieh is nearer to entailment than other kinds of implications. Some believe that Lozomieh has to be interpreted as relevant. And some believe that the definition of strict implication made by Lewis is the same as the definition of Lozomieh made by Abhary. Finally, after analyzing and criticizing these views, we want to bring to light the fact that to find the relation between Lozomieh and those of conditionals in modern Logic we have to compare all aspects of the paradigms of ancient logic and Modern logic. In addition, since the author believes that the material implication is absent in ancient logic and ancient logic is similar to relevant logic in many aspects, we have to compare the ancient logic as a paradigm to a kind of relevant logic that is substitution for material implication logic as another paradigm.http://uijs.ui.ac.ir/mph/browse.php?a_code=A-10-1-31&slc_lang=en&sid=1Lozomieh necessary relation ancient logic strict implication relevant conditional relevant logic
spellingShingle M Hajihosseini
Lozomieh in Ibn Sina’s Logic and its Relation to Various Kinds of Conditionals in Modern Logic with Analysis and Critique of Some Views
Metaphysics
Lozomieh
necessary relation
ancient logic
strict implication
relevant conditional
relevant logic
title Lozomieh in Ibn Sina’s Logic and its Relation to Various Kinds of Conditionals in Modern Logic with Analysis and Critique of Some Views
title_full Lozomieh in Ibn Sina’s Logic and its Relation to Various Kinds of Conditionals in Modern Logic with Analysis and Critique of Some Views
title_fullStr Lozomieh in Ibn Sina’s Logic and its Relation to Various Kinds of Conditionals in Modern Logic with Analysis and Critique of Some Views
title_full_unstemmed Lozomieh in Ibn Sina’s Logic and its Relation to Various Kinds of Conditionals in Modern Logic with Analysis and Critique of Some Views
title_short Lozomieh in Ibn Sina’s Logic and its Relation to Various Kinds of Conditionals in Modern Logic with Analysis and Critique of Some Views
title_sort lozomieh in ibn sina s logic and its relation to various kinds of conditionals in modern logic with analysis and critique of some views
topic Lozomieh
necessary relation
ancient logic
strict implication
relevant conditional
relevant logic
url http://uijs.ui.ac.ir/mph/browse.php?a_code=A-10-1-31&slc_lang=en&sid=1
work_keys_str_mv AT mhajihosseini lozomiehinibnsinaslogicanditsrelationtovariouskindsofconditionalsinmodernlogicwithanalysisandcritiqueofsomeviews