Comparison of the Compression and Tensile Modulus of Two Chosen Resins Used in Dentistry for 3D Printing
(1) The CAD/CAM technique exploiting 3D printing is becoming more and more popular in dentistry. The resins are used in all the dental specialties, including conservative dentistry, prosthodontics, surgery, and orthodontics. The interest in investigating the different properties of dental materials...
| Main Authors: | , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
MDPI AG
2022-12-01
|
| Series: | Materials |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1944/15/24/8956 |
| _version_ | 1797456534211395584 |
|---|---|
| author | Anna Paradowska-Stolarz Andrzej Malysa Marcin Mikulewicz |
| author_facet | Anna Paradowska-Stolarz Andrzej Malysa Marcin Mikulewicz |
| author_sort | Anna Paradowska-Stolarz |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | (1) The CAD/CAM technique exploiting 3D printing is becoming more and more popular in dentistry. The resins are used in all the dental specialties, including conservative dentistry, prosthodontics, surgery, and orthodontics. The interest in investigating the different properties of dental materials has been an aim of researchers. The purpose of the presented study was to compare the properties of two 3D-printable dental resins (both rigid, used for medical purposes). (2) Methods: Ten blocks of two-type shapes were printed on a printer designed for medical use. The tensile modulus and compression were investigated and compared. The axial compression test was performed according to the PN-EN ISO 604:2003 norm, while the tensile test was performed according to the PN-En ISO 527-1-2019 (E) norm. In the first test, the sample size of the perpendicular shape was 10 ± 0.2 mm × 10 ± 0.2 mm × 4 ± 0.2 mm and in the second it was 75 mm, the end width 10 mm, and the thickness 2 mm. (3) Results: The statistical analysis based on ANOVA tests showed that all the obtained results were statistically significant. Both of the examined materials had similar properties and were resistant and stable in shape. The tensile modulus and compression tests performed on them gave similar results. They also showed high durability to compression and tensility. (4) Conclusions: Both of the examined materials were durable and rigid materials. BioMed Amber was more resistant to compression, while Dental LT clear was more resistant in the tensility test. Although both resins had similar physical properties, it is still disputable whether the chosen materials could be used interchangeably. |
| first_indexed | 2024-03-09T16:09:10Z |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj.art-9115d9c8a50b43e18ad1ba7b6e9cd424 |
| institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
| issn | 1996-1944 |
| language | English |
| last_indexed | 2024-03-09T16:09:10Z |
| publishDate | 2022-12-01 |
| publisher | MDPI AG |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Materials |
| spelling | doaj.art-9115d9c8a50b43e18ad1ba7b6e9cd4242023-11-24T16:24:33ZengMDPI AGMaterials1996-19442022-12-011524895610.3390/ma15248956Comparison of the Compression and Tensile Modulus of Two Chosen Resins Used in Dentistry for 3D PrintingAnna Paradowska-Stolarz0Andrzej Malysa1Marcin Mikulewicz2Division of Dentofacial Anomalies, Department of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics, Wrocław Medical University, Krakowska 26, 50-425 Wrocław, PolandDepartment of Experimental Dentistry, Wrocław Medical University, Krakowska 26, 50-425 Wrocław, PolandDivision of Dentofacial Anomalies, Department of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics, Wrocław Medical University, Krakowska 26, 50-425 Wrocław, Poland(1) The CAD/CAM technique exploiting 3D printing is becoming more and more popular in dentistry. The resins are used in all the dental specialties, including conservative dentistry, prosthodontics, surgery, and orthodontics. The interest in investigating the different properties of dental materials has been an aim of researchers. The purpose of the presented study was to compare the properties of two 3D-printable dental resins (both rigid, used for medical purposes). (2) Methods: Ten blocks of two-type shapes were printed on a printer designed for medical use. The tensile modulus and compression were investigated and compared. The axial compression test was performed according to the PN-EN ISO 604:2003 norm, while the tensile test was performed according to the PN-En ISO 527-1-2019 (E) norm. In the first test, the sample size of the perpendicular shape was 10 ± 0.2 mm × 10 ± 0.2 mm × 4 ± 0.2 mm and in the second it was 75 mm, the end width 10 mm, and the thickness 2 mm. (3) Results: The statistical analysis based on ANOVA tests showed that all the obtained results were statistically significant. Both of the examined materials had similar properties and were resistant and stable in shape. The tensile modulus and compression tests performed on them gave similar results. They also showed high durability to compression and tensility. (4) Conclusions: Both of the examined materials were durable and rigid materials. BioMed Amber was more resistant to compression, while Dental LT clear was more resistant in the tensility test. Although both resins had similar physical properties, it is still disputable whether the chosen materials could be used interchangeably.https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1944/15/24/89563D-printlight-curedresindentistrysynthesized system |
| spellingShingle | Anna Paradowska-Stolarz Andrzej Malysa Marcin Mikulewicz Comparison of the Compression and Tensile Modulus of Two Chosen Resins Used in Dentistry for 3D Printing Materials 3D-print light-cured resin dentistry synthesized system |
| title | Comparison of the Compression and Tensile Modulus of Two Chosen Resins Used in Dentistry for 3D Printing |
| title_full | Comparison of the Compression and Tensile Modulus of Two Chosen Resins Used in Dentistry for 3D Printing |
| title_fullStr | Comparison of the Compression and Tensile Modulus of Two Chosen Resins Used in Dentistry for 3D Printing |
| title_full_unstemmed | Comparison of the Compression and Tensile Modulus of Two Chosen Resins Used in Dentistry for 3D Printing |
| title_short | Comparison of the Compression and Tensile Modulus of Two Chosen Resins Used in Dentistry for 3D Printing |
| title_sort | comparison of the compression and tensile modulus of two chosen resins used in dentistry for 3d printing |
| topic | 3D-print light-cured resin dentistry synthesized system |
| url | https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1944/15/24/8956 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT annaparadowskastolarz comparisonofthecompressionandtensilemodulusoftwochosenresinsusedindentistryfor3dprinting AT andrzejmalysa comparisonofthecompressionandtensilemodulusoftwochosenresinsusedindentistryfor3dprinting AT marcinmikulewicz comparisonofthecompressionandtensilemodulusoftwochosenresinsusedindentistryfor3dprinting |