How healthy is a ‘healthy economy’? Incompatibility between current pathways towards SDG3 and SDG8

Abstract Background The interconnections between health and the economy are well known and well documented. The funding gap for realizing SDG3 for good health and well-being, however, remains vast. Simultaneously, economic growth, as expressed and measured in SDG8, continues to leave many people beh...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Mariska Meurs, Lisa Seidelmann, Myria Koutsoumpa
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2019-12-01
Series:Globalization and Health
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1186/s12992-019-0532-4
_version_ 1818602356447641600
author Mariska Meurs
Lisa Seidelmann
Myria Koutsoumpa
author_facet Mariska Meurs
Lisa Seidelmann
Myria Koutsoumpa
author_sort Mariska Meurs
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Background The interconnections between health and the economy are well known and well documented. The funding gap for realizing SDG3 for good health and well-being, however, remains vast. Simultaneously, economic growth, as expressed and measured in SDG8, continues to leave many people behind. In addition, international financial institutions, notably the International Monetary Fund (IMF), continue to influence the economic and social policies that countries adopt in ways that could undermine achievement of the SDGs. We examine the incoherence between the economic growth and health goals of the SDGs with reference to three East African countries, Malawi, Uganda, and Tanzania, where our organization has been working with partner organizations on SDG related policy analysis and advocacy work. Results In all three study countries, some health indicators, notably infant and child mortality, show improvement, but other indicators are lagging behind. Underfunding of the health sector is a major cause for poor health of the population and inequities in access to health care. GDP increases (as a measure of economic growth) do not automatically translate to increases in the countries’ health spending. Health expenditure from domestic public resources remains much lower than the internationally recommended minimum of USD 86 per capita. To achieve this level of health spending from domestic resources only, GDP in these countries would require an unrealistic manifold increase. External aid is proving insufficient to close the funding gap. IMF policy advice and loan conditionality that focus on GDP growth and tight monetary and fiscal targets impair growth in health and social sector spending, while recommended taxation measures are generally regressive. Conclusions The existence of the GDP-focused SDG8 can delay efforts towards the achievement of the SDG3 for health and well-being if governments choose to focus on GDP growth without taking sufficient measures to equally distribute wealth and invest in the social sectors, often under the influence of policies advised or conditions put in place by the IMF. Although the IMF has started to acknowledge the importance of social development, its policy advice still adheres to austerity and pro-cyclical economic development harming a country’s population health. To realize the SDGs everywhere, governments should abandon GDP growth as a policy objective and place more emphasis on SDG17 on global co-operation.
first_indexed 2024-12-16T13:05:59Z
format Article
id doaj.art-9115ebae1a694393bd54f96711191721
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1744-8603
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-16T13:05:59Z
publishDate 2019-12-01
publisher BMC
record_format Article
series Globalization and Health
spelling doaj.art-9115ebae1a694393bd54f967111917212022-12-21T22:30:44ZengBMCGlobalization and Health1744-86032019-12-0115111310.1186/s12992-019-0532-4How healthy is a ‘healthy economy’? Incompatibility between current pathways towards SDG3 and SDG8Mariska Meurs0Lisa Seidelmann1Myria Koutsoumpa2Wemos Foundation, Ellermanstraat 15-O, 114 AKWemos Foundation, Ellermanstraat 15-O, 114 AKWemos Foundation, Ellermanstraat 15-O, 114 AKAbstract Background The interconnections between health and the economy are well known and well documented. The funding gap for realizing SDG3 for good health and well-being, however, remains vast. Simultaneously, economic growth, as expressed and measured in SDG8, continues to leave many people behind. In addition, international financial institutions, notably the International Monetary Fund (IMF), continue to influence the economic and social policies that countries adopt in ways that could undermine achievement of the SDGs. We examine the incoherence between the economic growth and health goals of the SDGs with reference to three East African countries, Malawi, Uganda, and Tanzania, where our organization has been working with partner organizations on SDG related policy analysis and advocacy work. Results In all three study countries, some health indicators, notably infant and child mortality, show improvement, but other indicators are lagging behind. Underfunding of the health sector is a major cause for poor health of the population and inequities in access to health care. GDP increases (as a measure of economic growth) do not automatically translate to increases in the countries’ health spending. Health expenditure from domestic public resources remains much lower than the internationally recommended minimum of USD 86 per capita. To achieve this level of health spending from domestic resources only, GDP in these countries would require an unrealistic manifold increase. External aid is proving insufficient to close the funding gap. IMF policy advice and loan conditionality that focus on GDP growth and tight monetary and fiscal targets impair growth in health and social sector spending, while recommended taxation measures are generally regressive. Conclusions The existence of the GDP-focused SDG8 can delay efforts towards the achievement of the SDG3 for health and well-being if governments choose to focus on GDP growth without taking sufficient measures to equally distribute wealth and invest in the social sectors, often under the influence of policies advised or conditions put in place by the IMF. Although the IMF has started to acknowledge the importance of social development, its policy advice still adheres to austerity and pro-cyclical economic development harming a country’s population health. To realize the SDGs everywhere, governments should abandon GDP growth as a policy objective and place more emphasis on SDG17 on global co-operation.https://doi.org/10.1186/s12992-019-0532-4MalawiTanzaniaUgandaIMFSDGsEconomic growth
spellingShingle Mariska Meurs
Lisa Seidelmann
Myria Koutsoumpa
How healthy is a ‘healthy economy’? Incompatibility between current pathways towards SDG3 and SDG8
Globalization and Health
Malawi
Tanzania
Uganda
IMF
SDGs
Economic growth
title How healthy is a ‘healthy economy’? Incompatibility between current pathways towards SDG3 and SDG8
title_full How healthy is a ‘healthy economy’? Incompatibility between current pathways towards SDG3 and SDG8
title_fullStr How healthy is a ‘healthy economy’? Incompatibility between current pathways towards SDG3 and SDG8
title_full_unstemmed How healthy is a ‘healthy economy’? Incompatibility between current pathways towards SDG3 and SDG8
title_short How healthy is a ‘healthy economy’? Incompatibility between current pathways towards SDG3 and SDG8
title_sort how healthy is a healthy economy incompatibility between current pathways towards sdg3 and sdg8
topic Malawi
Tanzania
Uganda
IMF
SDGs
Economic growth
url https://doi.org/10.1186/s12992-019-0532-4
work_keys_str_mv AT mariskameurs howhealthyisahealthyeconomyincompatibilitybetweencurrentpathwaystowardssdg3andsdg8
AT lisaseidelmann howhealthyisahealthyeconomyincompatibilitybetweencurrentpathwaystowardssdg3andsdg8
AT myriakoutsoumpa howhealthyisahealthyeconomyincompatibilitybetweencurrentpathwaystowardssdg3andsdg8