Investigation of non-target gas interferences on a multi-gas cavity ring-down spectrometer

Emissions from agriculture are a worldwide problem as it is the major anthropogenic source of ammonia, methane, and nitrous oxide. Several efforts have been made to mitigate emissions. To achieve this, reliable measuring techniques are necessary to quantify the impact of the emissions. Different tec...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Pablo García, Anna Holm Støckler, Anders Feilberg, Jesper Nørlem Kamp
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Elsevier 2024-04-01
Series:Atmospheric Environment: X
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S259016212400025X
_version_ 1797205985342783488
author Pablo García
Anna Holm Støckler
Anders Feilberg
Jesper Nørlem Kamp
author_facet Pablo García
Anna Holm Støckler
Anders Feilberg
Jesper Nørlem Kamp
author_sort Pablo García
collection DOAJ
description Emissions from agriculture are a worldwide problem as it is the major anthropogenic source of ammonia, methane, and nitrous oxide. Several efforts have been made to mitigate emissions. To achieve this, reliable measuring techniques are necessary to quantify the impact of the emissions. Different techniques relying on different principles are available. Generally, these techniques demonstrate good agreement on their measurements but there is a lack of studies that thoroughly investigate cross-interferences. In this work, three different models of Cavity Ring-Down Spectrometers measuring ammonia, nitrous oxide, and methane were tested in parallel for potential biases due to interference from ammonia, water vapor, and twelve volatile organic compounds commonly present in agricultural environments. Our results showed a small negative bias with increasing humidity on nitrous oxide and minor interferences of ammonia on nitrous oxide and methane. None of the tested volatile organic compounds interfered with ammonia, methane, or nitrous oxide measurements. Overall, concentration measurements of ammonia, nitrous oxide, and methane with cavity ring-down spectrometry have proven reliable under typical agricultural conditions. Minor interferences were only observed under exceptional conditions.
first_indexed 2024-04-24T08:59:49Z
format Article
id doaj.art-9122d9e6d8fb482eb70867bf60c4e58c
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2590-1621
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-24T08:59:49Z
publishDate 2024-04-01
publisher Elsevier
record_format Article
series Atmospheric Environment: X
spelling doaj.art-9122d9e6d8fb482eb70867bf60c4e58c2024-04-16T04:09:50ZengElsevierAtmospheric Environment: X2590-16212024-04-0122100258Investigation of non-target gas interferences on a multi-gas cavity ring-down spectrometerPablo García0Anna Holm Støckler1Anders Feilberg2Jesper Nørlem Kamp3Department of Biological and Chemical Engineering, Aarhus University, Aarhus, 8000, DenmarkDepartment of Biological and Chemical Engineering, Aarhus University, Aarhus, 8000, DenmarkDepartment of Biological and Chemical Engineering, Aarhus University, Aarhus, 8000, DenmarkCorresponding author. Blichers Allé 20, 8830, Tjele, Denmark.; Department of Biological and Chemical Engineering, Aarhus University, Aarhus, 8000, DenmarkEmissions from agriculture are a worldwide problem as it is the major anthropogenic source of ammonia, methane, and nitrous oxide. Several efforts have been made to mitigate emissions. To achieve this, reliable measuring techniques are necessary to quantify the impact of the emissions. Different techniques relying on different principles are available. Generally, these techniques demonstrate good agreement on their measurements but there is a lack of studies that thoroughly investigate cross-interferences. In this work, three different models of Cavity Ring-Down Spectrometers measuring ammonia, nitrous oxide, and methane were tested in parallel for potential biases due to interference from ammonia, water vapor, and twelve volatile organic compounds commonly present in agricultural environments. Our results showed a small negative bias with increasing humidity on nitrous oxide and minor interferences of ammonia on nitrous oxide and methane. None of the tested volatile organic compounds interfered with ammonia, methane, or nitrous oxide measurements. Overall, concentration measurements of ammonia, nitrous oxide, and methane with cavity ring-down spectrometry have proven reliable under typical agricultural conditions. Minor interferences were only observed under exceptional conditions.http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S259016212400025XConcentration measurementsCRDSAnalyzerValidationAmmoniaMethane
spellingShingle Pablo García
Anna Holm Støckler
Anders Feilberg
Jesper Nørlem Kamp
Investigation of non-target gas interferences on a multi-gas cavity ring-down spectrometer
Atmospheric Environment: X
Concentration measurements
CRDS
Analyzer
Validation
Ammonia
Methane
title Investigation of non-target gas interferences on a multi-gas cavity ring-down spectrometer
title_full Investigation of non-target gas interferences on a multi-gas cavity ring-down spectrometer
title_fullStr Investigation of non-target gas interferences on a multi-gas cavity ring-down spectrometer
title_full_unstemmed Investigation of non-target gas interferences on a multi-gas cavity ring-down spectrometer
title_short Investigation of non-target gas interferences on a multi-gas cavity ring-down spectrometer
title_sort investigation of non target gas interferences on a multi gas cavity ring down spectrometer
topic Concentration measurements
CRDS
Analyzer
Validation
Ammonia
Methane
url http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S259016212400025X
work_keys_str_mv AT pablogarcia investigationofnontargetgasinterferencesonamultigascavityringdownspectrometer
AT annaholmstøckler investigationofnontargetgasinterferencesonamultigascavityringdownspectrometer
AT andersfeilberg investigationofnontargetgasinterferencesonamultigascavityringdownspectrometer
AT jespernørlemkamp investigationofnontargetgasinterferencesonamultigascavityringdownspectrometer