Social disparities in food preparation behaviours: a DEDIPAC study

Abstract Background The specific role of major socio-economic indicators in influencing food preparation behaviours could reveal distinct socio-economic patterns, thus enabling mechanisms to be understood that contribute to social inequalities in health. This study investigated whether there was an...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Caroline Méjean, Wendy Si Hassen, Séverine Gojard, Pauline Ducrot, Aurélie Lampuré, Hans Brug, Nanna Lien, Mary Nicolaou, Michelle Holdsworth, Laura Terragni, Serge Hercberg, Katia Castetbon
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2017-09-01
Series:Nutrition Journal
Subjects:
Online Access:http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12937-017-0281-2
_version_ 1818138002175557632
author Caroline Méjean
Wendy Si Hassen
Séverine Gojard
Pauline Ducrot
Aurélie Lampuré
Hans Brug
Nanna Lien
Mary Nicolaou
Michelle Holdsworth
Laura Terragni
Serge Hercberg
Katia Castetbon
author_facet Caroline Méjean
Wendy Si Hassen
Séverine Gojard
Pauline Ducrot
Aurélie Lampuré
Hans Brug
Nanna Lien
Mary Nicolaou
Michelle Holdsworth
Laura Terragni
Serge Hercberg
Katia Castetbon
author_sort Caroline Méjean
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Background The specific role of major socio-economic indicators in influencing food preparation behaviours could reveal distinct socio-economic patterns, thus enabling mechanisms to be understood that contribute to social inequalities in health. This study investigated whether there was an independent association of each socio-economic indicator (education, occupation, income) with food preparation behaviours. Methods A total of 62,373 adults participating in the web-based NutriNet-Santé cohort study were included in our cross-sectional analyses. Cooking skills, preparation from scratch and kitchen equipment were assessed using a 0–10-point score; frequency of meal preparation, enjoyment of cooking and willingness to cook better/more frequently were categorical variables. Independent associations between socio-economic factors (education, income and occupation) and food preparation behaviours were assessed using analysis of covariance and logistic regression models stratified by sex. The models simultaneously included the three socio-economic indicators, adjusting for age, household composition and whether or not they were the main cook in the household. Results Participants with the lowest education, the lowest income group and female manual and office workers spent more time preparing food daily than participants with the highest education, those with the highest income and managerial staff (P < 0.0001). The lowest educated individuals were more likely to be non-cooks than those with the highest education level (Women: OR = 3.36 (1.69;6.69); Men: OR = 1.83 (1.07;3.16)) while female manual and office workers and the never-employed were less likely to be non-cooks (OR = 0.52 (0.28;0.97); OR = 0.30 (0.11;0.77)). Female manual and office workers had lower scores of preparation from scratch and were less likely to want to cook more frequently than managerial staff (P < 0.001 and P < 0.001). Women belonging to the lowest income group had a lower score of kitchen equipment (P < 0.0001) and were less likely to enjoy cooking meal daily (OR = 0.68 (0.45;0.86)) than those with the highest income. Conclusion Lowest socio-economic groups, particularly women, spend more time preparing food than high socioeconomic groups. However, female manual and office workers used less raw or fresh ingredients to prepare meals than managerial staff. In the unfavourable context in France with reduced time spent preparing meals over last decades, our findings showed socioeconomic disparities in food preparation behaviours in women, whereas few differences were observed in men.
first_indexed 2024-12-11T10:05:16Z
format Article
id doaj.art-9123cf8b8e5a43e086a37a735bb3338c
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1475-2891
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-11T10:05:16Z
publishDate 2017-09-01
publisher BMC
record_format Article
series Nutrition Journal
spelling doaj.art-9123cf8b8e5a43e086a37a735bb3338c2022-12-22T01:11:58ZengBMCNutrition Journal1475-28912017-09-0116111310.1186/s12937-017-0281-2Social disparities in food preparation behaviours: a DEDIPAC studyCaroline Méjean0Wendy Si Hassen1Séverine Gojard2Pauline Ducrot3Aurélie Lampuré4Hans Brug5Nanna Lien6Mary Nicolaou7Michelle Holdsworth8Laura Terragni9Serge Hercberg10Katia Castetbon11Université Paris 13, Sorbonne Paris Cité, Equipe de Recherche en Epidémiologie Nutritionnelle, Centre de Recherche en Epidémiologies et Biostatistiques, Inserm (U1153), Inra (U1125), CnamUniversité Paris 13, Sorbonne Paris Cité, Equipe de Recherche en Epidémiologie Nutritionnelle, Centre de Recherche en Epidémiologies et Biostatistiques, Inserm (U1153), Inra (U1125), CnamINRA, UR1303 ALISS, 65 Boulevard de BrandebourgUniversité Paris 13, Sorbonne Paris Cité, Equipe de Recherche en Epidémiologie Nutritionnelle, Centre de Recherche en Epidémiologies et Biostatistiques, Inserm (U1153), Inra (U1125), CnamUniversité Paris 13, Sorbonne Paris Cité, Equipe de Recherche en Epidémiologie Nutritionnelle, Centre de Recherche en Epidémiologies et Biostatistiques, Inserm (U1153), Inra (U1125), CnamDepartment of Epidemiology & Biostatistics, EMGO Institute for Health and Care Research, VU University Medical CenterDepartment of Nutrition, Faculty of Medicine, University of OsloDepartment of Public Health, Academic Medical Centre, University of AmsterdamSchool of Health and Related Research (ScHARR), Public Health section, The University of SheffieldDepartment of Nursing and Health Promotion, Faculty of Health Sciences, Oslo and Akershus University College of Applied SciencesUniversité Paris 13, Sorbonne Paris Cité, Equipe de Recherche en Epidémiologie Nutritionnelle, Centre de Recherche en Epidémiologies et Biostatistiques, Inserm (U1153), Inra (U1125), CnamUniversité Libre de Bruxelles (ULB), Ecole de Santé PubliqueAbstract Background The specific role of major socio-economic indicators in influencing food preparation behaviours could reveal distinct socio-economic patterns, thus enabling mechanisms to be understood that contribute to social inequalities in health. This study investigated whether there was an independent association of each socio-economic indicator (education, occupation, income) with food preparation behaviours. Methods A total of 62,373 adults participating in the web-based NutriNet-Santé cohort study were included in our cross-sectional analyses. Cooking skills, preparation from scratch and kitchen equipment were assessed using a 0–10-point score; frequency of meal preparation, enjoyment of cooking and willingness to cook better/more frequently were categorical variables. Independent associations between socio-economic factors (education, income and occupation) and food preparation behaviours were assessed using analysis of covariance and logistic regression models stratified by sex. The models simultaneously included the three socio-economic indicators, adjusting for age, household composition and whether or not they were the main cook in the household. Results Participants with the lowest education, the lowest income group and female manual and office workers spent more time preparing food daily than participants with the highest education, those with the highest income and managerial staff (P < 0.0001). The lowest educated individuals were more likely to be non-cooks than those with the highest education level (Women: OR = 3.36 (1.69;6.69); Men: OR = 1.83 (1.07;3.16)) while female manual and office workers and the never-employed were less likely to be non-cooks (OR = 0.52 (0.28;0.97); OR = 0.30 (0.11;0.77)). Female manual and office workers had lower scores of preparation from scratch and were less likely to want to cook more frequently than managerial staff (P < 0.001 and P < 0.001). Women belonging to the lowest income group had a lower score of kitchen equipment (P < 0.0001) and were less likely to enjoy cooking meal daily (OR = 0.68 (0.45;0.86)) than those with the highest income. Conclusion Lowest socio-economic groups, particularly women, spend more time preparing food than high socioeconomic groups. However, female manual and office workers used less raw or fresh ingredients to prepare meals than managerial staff. In the unfavourable context in France with reduced time spent preparing meals over last decades, our findings showed socioeconomic disparities in food preparation behaviours in women, whereas few differences were observed in men.http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12937-017-0281-2Food preparationCooking practicesSocioeconomicCooking skills
spellingShingle Caroline Méjean
Wendy Si Hassen
Séverine Gojard
Pauline Ducrot
Aurélie Lampuré
Hans Brug
Nanna Lien
Mary Nicolaou
Michelle Holdsworth
Laura Terragni
Serge Hercberg
Katia Castetbon
Social disparities in food preparation behaviours: a DEDIPAC study
Nutrition Journal
Food preparation
Cooking practices
Socioeconomic
Cooking skills
title Social disparities in food preparation behaviours: a DEDIPAC study
title_full Social disparities in food preparation behaviours: a DEDIPAC study
title_fullStr Social disparities in food preparation behaviours: a DEDIPAC study
title_full_unstemmed Social disparities in food preparation behaviours: a DEDIPAC study
title_short Social disparities in food preparation behaviours: a DEDIPAC study
title_sort social disparities in food preparation behaviours a dedipac study
topic Food preparation
Cooking practices
Socioeconomic
Cooking skills
url http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12937-017-0281-2
work_keys_str_mv AT carolinemejean socialdisparitiesinfoodpreparationbehavioursadedipacstudy
AT wendysihassen socialdisparitiesinfoodpreparationbehavioursadedipacstudy
AT severinegojard socialdisparitiesinfoodpreparationbehavioursadedipacstudy
AT paulineducrot socialdisparitiesinfoodpreparationbehavioursadedipacstudy
AT aurelielampure socialdisparitiesinfoodpreparationbehavioursadedipacstudy
AT hansbrug socialdisparitiesinfoodpreparationbehavioursadedipacstudy
AT nannalien socialdisparitiesinfoodpreparationbehavioursadedipacstudy
AT marynicolaou socialdisparitiesinfoodpreparationbehavioursadedipacstudy
AT michelleholdsworth socialdisparitiesinfoodpreparationbehavioursadedipacstudy
AT lauraterragni socialdisparitiesinfoodpreparationbehavioursadedipacstudy
AT sergehercberg socialdisparitiesinfoodpreparationbehavioursadedipacstudy
AT katiacastetbon socialdisparitiesinfoodpreparationbehavioursadedipacstudy