Scientific Cooperation: Supporting Circumpolar Permafrost Monitoring and Data Sharing
While the world continues to work toward an understanding and projections of climate change impacts, the Arctic increasingly becomes a critical component as a bellwether region. Scientific cooperation is a well-supported narrative and theme in general, but in reality, presents many challenges and co...
| Main Authors: | , , , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
MDPI AG
2021-06-01
|
| Series: | Land |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/10/6/590 |
| _version_ | 1797531527804878848 |
|---|---|
| author | Troy J. Bouffard Ekaterina Uryupova Klaus Dodds Vladimir E. Romanovsky Alec P. Bennett Dmitry Streletskiy |
| author_facet | Troy J. Bouffard Ekaterina Uryupova Klaus Dodds Vladimir E. Romanovsky Alec P. Bennett Dmitry Streletskiy |
| author_sort | Troy J. Bouffard |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | While the world continues to work toward an understanding and projections of climate change impacts, the Arctic increasingly becomes a critical component as a bellwether region. Scientific cooperation is a well-supported narrative and theme in general, but in reality, presents many challenges and counter-productive difficulties. Moreover, data sharing specifically represents one of the more critical cooperation requirements, as part of the “scientific method [which] allows for verification of results and extending research from prior results”. One of the important pieces of the climate change puzzle is permafrost. In general, observational data on permafrost characteristics are limited. Currently, most permafrost data remain fragmented and restricted to national authorities, including scientific institutes. The preponderance of permafrost data is not available openly—important datasets reside in various government or university labs, where they remain largely unknown or where access restrictions prevent effective use. Although highly authoritative, separate data efforts involving creation and management result in a very incomplete picture of the state of permafrost as well as what to possibly anticipate. While nations maintain excellent individual permafrost research programs, a lack of shared research—especially data—significantly reduces effectiveness of understanding permafrost overall. Different nations resource and employ various approaches to studying permafrost, including the growing complexity of scientific modeling. Some are more effective than others and some achieve different purposes than others. Whereas it is not possible for a nation to effectively conduct the variety of modeling and research needed to comprehensively understand impacts to permafrost, a global community can. In some ways, separate scientific communities are not necessarily concerned about sharing data—their work is secured. However, decision and policy makers, especially on the international stage, struggle to understand how best to anticipate and prepare for changes, and thus support for scientific recommendations during policy development. To date, there is a lack of research exploring the need to share circumpolar permafrost data. This article will explore the global data systems on permafrost, which remain sporadic, rarely updated, and with almost nothing about the subsea permafrost publicly available. The authors suggest that the global permafrost monitoring system should be real time (within technical and reasonable possibility), often updated and with open access to the data (general way of representing data required). Additionally, it will require robust co-ordination in terms of accessibility, funding, and protocols to avoid either duplication and/or information sharing. Following a brief background, this article will offer three supporting themes, (1) the current state of permafrost data, (2) rationale and methods to share data, and (3) implications for global and national interests. |
| first_indexed | 2024-03-10T10:45:02Z |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj.art-9128319d46d34887bdf3c03774fbded4 |
| institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
| issn | 2073-445X |
| language | English |
| last_indexed | 2024-03-10T10:45:02Z |
| publishDate | 2021-06-01 |
| publisher | MDPI AG |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Land |
| spelling | doaj.art-9128319d46d34887bdf3c03774fbded42023-11-21T22:39:03ZengMDPI AGLand2073-445X2021-06-0110659010.3390/land10060590Scientific Cooperation: Supporting Circumpolar Permafrost Monitoring and Data SharingTroy J. Bouffard0Ekaterina Uryupova1Klaus Dodds2Vladimir E. Romanovsky3Alec P. Bennett4Dmitry Streletskiy5Center for Arctic Security and Resilience, University of Alaska Fairbanks, Fairbanks, AK 99775, USAAssociation of Polar Early Career Scientists, Arctic Institute, IS-600 Akureyri, IcelandDepartment of Geography, Royal Holloway University of London, Egham TW20 0EX, UKGeophysical Institute (Emeritus), University of Alaska Fairbanks, Fairbanks, AK 99775, USASchool of Management, University of Alaska Fairbanks, Fairbanks, AK 99775, USADepartment of Geography, George Washington University, Washington, DC 20052, USAWhile the world continues to work toward an understanding and projections of climate change impacts, the Arctic increasingly becomes a critical component as a bellwether region. Scientific cooperation is a well-supported narrative and theme in general, but in reality, presents many challenges and counter-productive difficulties. Moreover, data sharing specifically represents one of the more critical cooperation requirements, as part of the “scientific method [which] allows for verification of results and extending research from prior results”. One of the important pieces of the climate change puzzle is permafrost. In general, observational data on permafrost characteristics are limited. Currently, most permafrost data remain fragmented and restricted to national authorities, including scientific institutes. The preponderance of permafrost data is not available openly—important datasets reside in various government or university labs, where they remain largely unknown or where access restrictions prevent effective use. Although highly authoritative, separate data efforts involving creation and management result in a very incomplete picture of the state of permafrost as well as what to possibly anticipate. While nations maintain excellent individual permafrost research programs, a lack of shared research—especially data—significantly reduces effectiveness of understanding permafrost overall. Different nations resource and employ various approaches to studying permafrost, including the growing complexity of scientific modeling. Some are more effective than others and some achieve different purposes than others. Whereas it is not possible for a nation to effectively conduct the variety of modeling and research needed to comprehensively understand impacts to permafrost, a global community can. In some ways, separate scientific communities are not necessarily concerned about sharing data—their work is secured. However, decision and policy makers, especially on the international stage, struggle to understand how best to anticipate and prepare for changes, and thus support for scientific recommendations during policy development. To date, there is a lack of research exploring the need to share circumpolar permafrost data. This article will explore the global data systems on permafrost, which remain sporadic, rarely updated, and with almost nothing about the subsea permafrost publicly available. The authors suggest that the global permafrost monitoring system should be real time (within technical and reasonable possibility), often updated and with open access to the data (general way of representing data required). Additionally, it will require robust co-ordination in terms of accessibility, funding, and protocols to avoid either duplication and/or information sharing. Following a brief background, this article will offer three supporting themes, (1) the current state of permafrost data, (2) rationale and methods to share data, and (3) implications for global and national interests.https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/10/6/590permafrostpermafrost monitoringpermafrost datadata sharingnational security |
| spellingShingle | Troy J. Bouffard Ekaterina Uryupova Klaus Dodds Vladimir E. Romanovsky Alec P. Bennett Dmitry Streletskiy Scientific Cooperation: Supporting Circumpolar Permafrost Monitoring and Data Sharing Land permafrost permafrost monitoring permafrost data data sharing national security |
| title | Scientific Cooperation: Supporting Circumpolar Permafrost Monitoring and Data Sharing |
| title_full | Scientific Cooperation: Supporting Circumpolar Permafrost Monitoring and Data Sharing |
| title_fullStr | Scientific Cooperation: Supporting Circumpolar Permafrost Monitoring and Data Sharing |
| title_full_unstemmed | Scientific Cooperation: Supporting Circumpolar Permafrost Monitoring and Data Sharing |
| title_short | Scientific Cooperation: Supporting Circumpolar Permafrost Monitoring and Data Sharing |
| title_sort | scientific cooperation supporting circumpolar permafrost monitoring and data sharing |
| topic | permafrost permafrost monitoring permafrost data data sharing national security |
| url | https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/10/6/590 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT troyjbouffard scientificcooperationsupportingcircumpolarpermafrostmonitoringanddatasharing AT ekaterinauryupova scientificcooperationsupportingcircumpolarpermafrostmonitoringanddatasharing AT klausdodds scientificcooperationsupportingcircumpolarpermafrostmonitoringanddatasharing AT vladimireromanovsky scientificcooperationsupportingcircumpolarpermafrostmonitoringanddatasharing AT alecpbennett scientificcooperationsupportingcircumpolarpermafrostmonitoringanddatasharing AT dmitrystreletskiy scientificcooperationsupportingcircumpolarpermafrostmonitoringanddatasharing |