Automatic phantom-less QCT system with high precision of BMD measurement for osteoporosis screening: Technique optimisation and clinical validation
Background: Currently dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) and phantom-based quantitative computed tomography (PB-QCT) have been utilized to diagnose osteoporosis widely in clinical practice. While traditional phantom-less QCT (PL-QCT) is limited by the precision of manual calibration using body t...
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Elsevier
2022-03-01
|
Series: | Journal of Orthopaedic Translation |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214031X21001005 |
_version_ | 1828344714075570176 |
---|---|
author | Zhuo-Jie Liu Cheng Zhang Chi Ma Huan Qi Ze-Hong Yang Hao-Yu Wu Ke-Di Yang Jun-Yu Lin Tak-Man Wong Zhao-Yang Li Chun-Hai Li Yue Ding |
author_facet | Zhuo-Jie Liu Cheng Zhang Chi Ma Huan Qi Ze-Hong Yang Hao-Yu Wu Ke-Di Yang Jun-Yu Lin Tak-Man Wong Zhao-Yang Li Chun-Hai Li Yue Ding |
author_sort | Zhuo-Jie Liu |
collection | DOAJ |
description | Background: Currently dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) and phantom-based quantitative computed tomography (PB-QCT) have been utilized to diagnose osteoporosis widely in clinical practice. While traditional phantom-less QCT (PL-QCT) is limited by the precision of manual calibration using body tissues, such as fat and muscle. Objective: The aim of this study is to validate the accuracy and precision of one newly-developed automatic PL-QCT system to measure spinal bone mineral density (BMD) and diagnose osteoporosis. Methods: A total of 36 patients were enrolled for comparison of BMD measurement between DXA and QCT. CT images of 63 patients were analyzed by both PB-QCT and newly developed automatic PL-QCT system, then the BMD results generated by the automatic PL-QCT were utilized to diagnose osteoporosis. The diagnostic outcomes were compared with that of DXA and PB-QCT to assess the performance of the new system. Results: BMD test results showed that the automatic PL-QCT system had higher precision than previous studies performed with QCT, while maintaining similar capability to diagnose osteoporosis as DXA and PB-QCT. Area under curve (AUC) result of PL-QCT was larger than 0.8 for predicting spine DXA T-score in receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis. Pearson correlation analysis (r = 0.99) showed strong linear correlation and Bland-Altman analysis (bias = 3.0mg/cc) indicated little difference between the two methods. The precision result (CV = 0.89%) represented good reproducibility of the new system. Conclusion: The traditional PL-QCT system has relatively low reproducibility due to the manual selection of the region of interest (ROI) of body tissues. Automatic selection of ROI in this new system makes the BMD testing more convenient and improves precision significantly. Compared with traditional BMD measurement methods, the automatic PL-QCT system had higher precision in accurate diagnosis of osteoporosis with great potential in translational research and wide clinical application. Translational potential statement: With high accuracy and precision, the automatic PL-QCT system could serve as an opportunistic screening tool for osteoporosis patients in the future. It could also facilitate related researches by providing more reliable data collection, both retrospectively and longitudinally. |
first_indexed | 2024-04-14T00:01:27Z |
format | Article |
id | doaj.art-912a9b3ef4644aeaa8e1d904871a226d |
institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
issn | 2214-031X |
language | English |
last_indexed | 2024-04-14T00:01:27Z |
publishDate | 2022-03-01 |
publisher | Elsevier |
record_format | Article |
series | Journal of Orthopaedic Translation |
spelling | doaj.art-912a9b3ef4644aeaa8e1d904871a226d2022-12-22T02:23:41ZengElsevierJournal of Orthopaedic Translation2214-031X2022-03-01332430Automatic phantom-less QCT system with high precision of BMD measurement for osteoporosis screening: Technique optimisation and clinical validationZhuo-Jie Liu0Cheng Zhang1Chi Ma2Huan Qi3Ze-Hong Yang4Hao-Yu Wu5Ke-Di Yang6Jun-Yu Lin7Tak-Man Wong8Zhao-Yang Li9Chun-Hai Li10Yue Ding11Department of Orthopaedics, Sun Yat-Sen Memorial Hospital, Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou, PR ChinaDepartment of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, Li Ka Shing Faculty of Medicine, The University of Hong Kong, Pokfulam, PR China; Shenzhen Key Laboratory for Innovative Technology in Orthopaedic Trauma, Guangdong Engineering Technology Research Center for Orthopaedic Trauma Repair, Department of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, The University of Hong Kong-Shenzhen Hospital, Shenzhen, PR ChinaDepartment of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, Li Ka Shing Faculty of Medicine, The University of Hong Kong, Pokfulam, PR China; Shenzhen Key Laboratory for Innovative Technology in Orthopaedic Trauma, Guangdong Engineering Technology Research Center for Orthopaedic Trauma Repair, Department of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, The University of Hong Kong-Shenzhen Hospital, Shenzhen, PR ChinaDepartment of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, Li Ka Shing Faculty of Medicine, The University of Hong Kong, Pokfulam, PR China; Shenzhen Key Laboratory for Innovative Technology in Orthopaedic Trauma, Guangdong Engineering Technology Research Center for Orthopaedic Trauma Repair, Department of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, The University of Hong Kong-Shenzhen Hospital, Shenzhen, PR ChinaDepartment of Medical Imaging, Sun Yat-Sen Memorial Hospital, Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou, PR ChinaDepartment of Orthopaedics, Sun Yat-Sen Memorial Hospital, Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou, PR ChinaDepartment of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, Li Ka Shing Faculty of Medicine, The University of Hong Kong, Pokfulam, PR China; Shenzhen Key Laboratory for Innovative Technology in Orthopaedic Trauma, Guangdong Engineering Technology Research Center for Orthopaedic Trauma Repair, Department of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, The University of Hong Kong-Shenzhen Hospital, Shenzhen, PR ChinaDepartment of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, Li Ka Shing Faculty of Medicine, The University of Hong Kong, Pokfulam, PR China; Shenzhen Key Laboratory for Innovative Technology in Orthopaedic Trauma, Guangdong Engineering Technology Research Center for Orthopaedic Trauma Repair, Department of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, The University of Hong Kong-Shenzhen Hospital, Shenzhen, PR ChinaDepartment of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, Li Ka Shing Faculty of Medicine, The University of Hong Kong, Pokfulam, PR China; Shenzhen Key Laboratory for Innovative Technology in Orthopaedic Trauma, Guangdong Engineering Technology Research Center for Orthopaedic Trauma Repair, Department of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, The University of Hong Kong-Shenzhen Hospital, Shenzhen, PR ChinaSchool of Materials Science & Engineering, Tianjin University, Tianjin, PR ChinaDepartment of Orthopaedics, Sun Yat-Sen Memorial Hospital, Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou, PR China; Corresponding author. Department of Orthopaedics, Sun Yat-sen Memorial Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, No. 107 Yanjiang West Road, 520120, Guangzhou, Guangdong, PR China.Department of Orthopaedics, Sun Yat-Sen Memorial Hospital, Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou, PR China; Corresponding author. Department of Orthopaedics, Sun Yat-sen Memorial Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, No. 107 Yanjiang West Road, 520120, Guangzhou, Guangdong, PR China.Background: Currently dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) and phantom-based quantitative computed tomography (PB-QCT) have been utilized to diagnose osteoporosis widely in clinical practice. While traditional phantom-less QCT (PL-QCT) is limited by the precision of manual calibration using body tissues, such as fat and muscle. Objective: The aim of this study is to validate the accuracy and precision of one newly-developed automatic PL-QCT system to measure spinal bone mineral density (BMD) and diagnose osteoporosis. Methods: A total of 36 patients were enrolled for comparison of BMD measurement between DXA and QCT. CT images of 63 patients were analyzed by both PB-QCT and newly developed automatic PL-QCT system, then the BMD results generated by the automatic PL-QCT were utilized to diagnose osteoporosis. The diagnostic outcomes were compared with that of DXA and PB-QCT to assess the performance of the new system. Results: BMD test results showed that the automatic PL-QCT system had higher precision than previous studies performed with QCT, while maintaining similar capability to diagnose osteoporosis as DXA and PB-QCT. Area under curve (AUC) result of PL-QCT was larger than 0.8 for predicting spine DXA T-score in receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis. Pearson correlation analysis (r = 0.99) showed strong linear correlation and Bland-Altman analysis (bias = 3.0mg/cc) indicated little difference between the two methods. The precision result (CV = 0.89%) represented good reproducibility of the new system. Conclusion: The traditional PL-QCT system has relatively low reproducibility due to the manual selection of the region of interest (ROI) of body tissues. Automatic selection of ROI in this new system makes the BMD testing more convenient and improves precision significantly. Compared with traditional BMD measurement methods, the automatic PL-QCT system had higher precision in accurate diagnosis of osteoporosis with great potential in translational research and wide clinical application. Translational potential statement: With high accuracy and precision, the automatic PL-QCT system could serve as an opportunistic screening tool for osteoporosis patients in the future. It could also facilitate related researches by providing more reliable data collection, both retrospectively and longitudinally.http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214031X21001005Bone mineral densityDXAOsteoporosisPhantom-less QCTSpine |
spellingShingle | Zhuo-Jie Liu Cheng Zhang Chi Ma Huan Qi Ze-Hong Yang Hao-Yu Wu Ke-Di Yang Jun-Yu Lin Tak-Man Wong Zhao-Yang Li Chun-Hai Li Yue Ding Automatic phantom-less QCT system with high precision of BMD measurement for osteoporosis screening: Technique optimisation and clinical validation Journal of Orthopaedic Translation Bone mineral density DXA Osteoporosis Phantom-less QCT Spine |
title | Automatic phantom-less QCT system with high precision of BMD measurement for osteoporosis screening: Technique optimisation and clinical validation |
title_full | Automatic phantom-less QCT system with high precision of BMD measurement for osteoporosis screening: Technique optimisation and clinical validation |
title_fullStr | Automatic phantom-less QCT system with high precision of BMD measurement for osteoporosis screening: Technique optimisation and clinical validation |
title_full_unstemmed | Automatic phantom-less QCT system with high precision of BMD measurement for osteoporosis screening: Technique optimisation and clinical validation |
title_short | Automatic phantom-less QCT system with high precision of BMD measurement for osteoporosis screening: Technique optimisation and clinical validation |
title_sort | automatic phantom less qct system with high precision of bmd measurement for osteoporosis screening technique optimisation and clinical validation |
topic | Bone mineral density DXA Osteoporosis Phantom-less QCT Spine |
url | http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214031X21001005 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT zhuojieliu automaticphantomlessqctsystemwithhighprecisionofbmdmeasurementforosteoporosisscreeningtechniqueoptimisationandclinicalvalidation AT chengzhang automaticphantomlessqctsystemwithhighprecisionofbmdmeasurementforosteoporosisscreeningtechniqueoptimisationandclinicalvalidation AT chima automaticphantomlessqctsystemwithhighprecisionofbmdmeasurementforosteoporosisscreeningtechniqueoptimisationandclinicalvalidation AT huanqi automaticphantomlessqctsystemwithhighprecisionofbmdmeasurementforosteoporosisscreeningtechniqueoptimisationandclinicalvalidation AT zehongyang automaticphantomlessqctsystemwithhighprecisionofbmdmeasurementforosteoporosisscreeningtechniqueoptimisationandclinicalvalidation AT haoyuwu automaticphantomlessqctsystemwithhighprecisionofbmdmeasurementforosteoporosisscreeningtechniqueoptimisationandclinicalvalidation AT kediyang automaticphantomlessqctsystemwithhighprecisionofbmdmeasurementforosteoporosisscreeningtechniqueoptimisationandclinicalvalidation AT junyulin automaticphantomlessqctsystemwithhighprecisionofbmdmeasurementforosteoporosisscreeningtechniqueoptimisationandclinicalvalidation AT takmanwong automaticphantomlessqctsystemwithhighprecisionofbmdmeasurementforosteoporosisscreeningtechniqueoptimisationandclinicalvalidation AT zhaoyangli automaticphantomlessqctsystemwithhighprecisionofbmdmeasurementforosteoporosisscreeningtechniqueoptimisationandclinicalvalidation AT chunhaili automaticphantomlessqctsystemwithhighprecisionofbmdmeasurementforosteoporosisscreeningtechniqueoptimisationandclinicalvalidation AT yueding automaticphantomlessqctsystemwithhighprecisionofbmdmeasurementforosteoporosisscreeningtechniqueoptimisationandclinicalvalidation |