Long-term outcomes of oncoplastic breast resection with local perforator flaps

Background. Oncoplastic breast resections with perforator flaps are relatively common now; however, many studies demonstrate contradictory results, especially in terms of long-term outcomes.Objective: to assess short-term and long-term outcomes of oncoplastic breast resection with defect repair usin...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Iu. S. Shatova, N. A. Maksimova, I. N. Vashchenko, N. A. Shevchenko, E. N. Chernikov
Format: Article
Language:Russian
Published: ABV-press 2022-05-01
Series:Опухоли женской репродуктивной системы
Subjects:
Online Access:https://ojrs.abvpress.ru/ojrs/article/view/930
_version_ 1826557223253311488
author Iu. S. Shatova
N. A. Maksimova
I. N. Vashchenko
N. A. Shevchenko
E. N. Chernikov
author_facet Iu. S. Shatova
N. A. Maksimova
I. N. Vashchenko
N. A. Shevchenko
E. N. Chernikov
author_sort Iu. S. Shatova
collection DOAJ
description Background. Oncoplastic breast resections with perforator flaps are relatively common now; however, many studies demonstrate contradictory results, especially in terms of long-term outcomes.Objective: to assess short-term and long-term outcomes of oncoplastic breast resection with defect repair using perforator flaps.Materials and methods. This study included 62 breast cancer patients who underwent oncoplastic breast resection with defect repair using local perforator flaps, including lateral intercostal artery perforator (LICAP) flaps (40.3 %), lateral thoracic artery perforator (LTAP) (19.4 %), anterior intercostal artery perforator (AICAP) (27.4 %), and medial intercostal artery perforator (MICAP) (12.9 %) flaps. The assessment of oncological, functional, and aesthetic outcomes was performed in patients who were followed-up for at least a year (n = 57). Mean follow-up time was 26.5 months (range: 14–38 months).Results. The following complications were registered among the patients studied: seroma in the area of excised primary tumor (8.1 %), insufficient blood supply of the flap that caused focal lipofibrosis/liponecrosis (3.2 %), positive resection margin (3.2 %), low position of the submammary fold (11.3 %), locoregional recurrence (0 %), generalized process (3.5 %). All women evaluated their functional and aesthetic result as good or excellent. According to BCCT.core 3.0, 91.3 % of patients achieved good and excellent results.
first_indexed 2024-04-10T01:55:30Z
format Article
id doaj.art-912ddfcbb41c4f929b8c925dafe650aa
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1994-4098
1999-8627
language Russian
last_indexed 2025-03-14T08:25:11Z
publishDate 2022-05-01
publisher ABV-press
record_format Article
series Опухоли женской репродуктивной системы
spelling doaj.art-912ddfcbb41c4f929b8c925dafe650aa2025-03-02T13:05:36ZrusABV-pressОпухоли женской репродуктивной системы1994-40981999-86272022-05-01181202410.17650/1994-4098-2022-18-1-20-24721Long-term outcomes of oncoplastic breast resection with local perforator flapsIu. S. Shatova0N. A. Maksimova1I. N. Vashchenko2N. A. Shevchenko3E. N. Chernikov4National Medical Research Center of Oncology, Ministry of Health of RussiaNational Medical Research Center of Oncology, Ministry of Health of RussiaNational Medical Research Center of Oncology, Ministry of Health of RussiaNational Medical Research Center of Oncology, Ministry of Health of RussiaNational Medical Research Center of Oncology, Ministry of Health of RussiaBackground. Oncoplastic breast resections with perforator flaps are relatively common now; however, many studies demonstrate contradictory results, especially in terms of long-term outcomes.Objective: to assess short-term and long-term outcomes of oncoplastic breast resection with defect repair using perforator flaps.Materials and methods. This study included 62 breast cancer patients who underwent oncoplastic breast resection with defect repair using local perforator flaps, including lateral intercostal artery perforator (LICAP) flaps (40.3 %), lateral thoracic artery perforator (LTAP) (19.4 %), anterior intercostal artery perforator (AICAP) (27.4 %), and medial intercostal artery perforator (MICAP) (12.9 %) flaps. The assessment of oncological, functional, and aesthetic outcomes was performed in patients who were followed-up for at least a year (n = 57). Mean follow-up time was 26.5 months (range: 14–38 months).Results. The following complications were registered among the patients studied: seroma in the area of excised primary tumor (8.1 %), insufficient blood supply of the flap that caused focal lipofibrosis/liponecrosis (3.2 %), positive resection margin (3.2 %), low position of the submammary fold (11.3 %), locoregional recurrence (0 %), generalized process (3.5 %). All women evaluated their functional and aesthetic result as good or excellent. According to BCCT.core 3.0, 91.3 % of patients achieved good and excellent results.https://ojrs.abvpress.ru/ojrs/article/view/930breast canceroncoplastic resectionperforator flap
spellingShingle Iu. S. Shatova
N. A. Maksimova
I. N. Vashchenko
N. A. Shevchenko
E. N. Chernikov
Long-term outcomes of oncoplastic breast resection with local perforator flaps
Опухоли женской репродуктивной системы
breast cancer
oncoplastic resection
perforator flap
title Long-term outcomes of oncoplastic breast resection with local perforator flaps
title_full Long-term outcomes of oncoplastic breast resection with local perforator flaps
title_fullStr Long-term outcomes of oncoplastic breast resection with local perforator flaps
title_full_unstemmed Long-term outcomes of oncoplastic breast resection with local perforator flaps
title_short Long-term outcomes of oncoplastic breast resection with local perforator flaps
title_sort long term outcomes of oncoplastic breast resection with local perforator flaps
topic breast cancer
oncoplastic resection
perforator flap
url https://ojrs.abvpress.ru/ojrs/article/view/930
work_keys_str_mv AT iusshatova longtermoutcomesofoncoplasticbreastresectionwithlocalperforatorflaps
AT namaksimova longtermoutcomesofoncoplasticbreastresectionwithlocalperforatorflaps
AT invashchenko longtermoutcomesofoncoplasticbreastresectionwithlocalperforatorflaps
AT nashevchenko longtermoutcomesofoncoplasticbreastresectionwithlocalperforatorflaps
AT enchernikov longtermoutcomesofoncoplasticbreastresectionwithlocalperforatorflaps