Bridging the Divide: Literature, Dao and the Case for Subjective Access in the Thought of Su Shi

In the 11th century in China, there was an unusual moment in which a number of philosophers, later associated with the Daoxue—or Neo-Confucian—school, confronted what they perceived as a long-standing sense of disjunction between inner, subjective reality and the structured patterns of the cosmos. O...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Curie Virág
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2014-10-01
Series:Humanities
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.mdpi.com/2076-0787/3/4/567
_version_ 1818902929835294720
author Curie Virág
author_facet Curie Virág
author_sort Curie Virág
collection DOAJ
description In the 11th century in China, there was an unusual moment in which a number of philosophers, later associated with the Daoxue—or Neo-Confucian—school, confronted what they perceived as a long-standing sense of disjunction between inner, subjective reality and the structured patterns of the cosmos. One way they sought to overcome this disjunction was by positing new theories of the cosmos that focused on the underlying, shared reality behind the myriad differentiations of phenomena. A potential tension was born that affected how thinkers understood the relationship between wen 文 (writing, literature, culture) and Dao 道 (the cosmic process, the ultimate reality, the normative path). Some thinkers, like Zhou Dunyi 周敦頤 (1017–1073), believed that wen was simply a vehicle for carrying the Dao, and was thus, implicitly, dispensable. This idea was met with resistance from one of the leading intellectual figures of the time—the philosopher, poet and statesman Su Shi 蘇軾 (1037–1101). While some of Su’s contemporaries, in their attempts to demonstrate that the world was real, and that truth was knowable, downplayed the role of individual experience and perception, Su stressed the necessity of subjective, individual experience as giving access, and concrete expression, to Dao. Su’s philosophical project came in the form of defending the enterprise of wen—writing as a creative, individual endeavor—and asserting that the quest for unity with the Dao could only be realized through direct, personal engagement in wen and other forms of meaningful practice. Through his philosophy of wen, Su sought to show that the search for truth, meaning and order did not—and could not—be achieved by transcending subjective experience. Instead, it had to be carried out at the point of encounter between self and the world, in the realm of practice.
first_indexed 2024-12-19T20:43:28Z
format Article
id doaj.art-91504a4dfdab4af1a2bbab7f8d8ff2af
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2076-0787
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-19T20:43:28Z
publishDate 2014-10-01
publisher MDPI AG
record_format Article
series Humanities
spelling doaj.art-91504a4dfdab4af1a2bbab7f8d8ff2af2022-12-21T20:06:19ZengMDPI AGHumanities2076-07872014-10-013456758410.3390/h3040567h3040567Bridging the Divide: Literature, Dao and the Case for Subjective Access in the Thought of Su ShiCurie Virág0Department of East Asian Studies, University of Toronto, 130 St. George St. 14-087, Toronto, ON M5S 3H1, CanadaIn the 11th century in China, there was an unusual moment in which a number of philosophers, later associated with the Daoxue—or Neo-Confucian—school, confronted what they perceived as a long-standing sense of disjunction between inner, subjective reality and the structured patterns of the cosmos. One way they sought to overcome this disjunction was by positing new theories of the cosmos that focused on the underlying, shared reality behind the myriad differentiations of phenomena. A potential tension was born that affected how thinkers understood the relationship between wen 文 (writing, literature, culture) and Dao 道 (the cosmic process, the ultimate reality, the normative path). Some thinkers, like Zhou Dunyi 周敦頤 (1017–1073), believed that wen was simply a vehicle for carrying the Dao, and was thus, implicitly, dispensable. This idea was met with resistance from one of the leading intellectual figures of the time—the philosopher, poet and statesman Su Shi 蘇軾 (1037–1101). While some of Su’s contemporaries, in their attempts to demonstrate that the world was real, and that truth was knowable, downplayed the role of individual experience and perception, Su stressed the necessity of subjective, individual experience as giving access, and concrete expression, to Dao. Su’s philosophical project came in the form of defending the enterprise of wen—writing as a creative, individual endeavor—and asserting that the quest for unity with the Dao could only be realized through direct, personal engagement in wen and other forms of meaningful practice. Through his philosophy of wen, Su sought to show that the search for truth, meaning and order did not—and could not—be achieved by transcending subjective experience. Instead, it had to be carried out at the point of encounter between self and the world, in the realm of practice.http://www.mdpi.com/2076-0787/3/4/567literaturephilosophyChinacosmologyDaoismneo-Confucianismaestheticsselfphenomenology
spellingShingle Curie Virág
Bridging the Divide: Literature, Dao and the Case for Subjective Access in the Thought of Su Shi
Humanities
literature
philosophy
China
cosmology
Daoism
neo-Confucianism
aesthetics
self
phenomenology
title Bridging the Divide: Literature, Dao and the Case for Subjective Access in the Thought of Su Shi
title_full Bridging the Divide: Literature, Dao and the Case for Subjective Access in the Thought of Su Shi
title_fullStr Bridging the Divide: Literature, Dao and the Case for Subjective Access in the Thought of Su Shi
title_full_unstemmed Bridging the Divide: Literature, Dao and the Case for Subjective Access in the Thought of Su Shi
title_short Bridging the Divide: Literature, Dao and the Case for Subjective Access in the Thought of Su Shi
title_sort bridging the divide literature dao and the case for subjective access in the thought of su shi
topic literature
philosophy
China
cosmology
Daoism
neo-Confucianism
aesthetics
self
phenomenology
url http://www.mdpi.com/2076-0787/3/4/567
work_keys_str_mv AT curievirag bridgingthedivideliteraturedaoandthecaseforsubjectiveaccessinthethoughtofsushi