Comparing closed versus open lateral internal sphincterotomy for management of chronic anal fissure: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised control trials
Abstract Chronic anal fissure is one of the most common benign anorectal health conditions, causing significant morbidity, quality of life, and economic loss. Eight randomized controlled trials with a total population size of 1035 were eligible for analysis. Seven studies included both males and fem...
Main Authors: | Zelalem Asefa, Atalel Fentahun Awedew |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Nature Portfolio
2023-11-01
|
Series: | Scientific Reports |
Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-48286-z |
Similar Items
-
Closed Versus Open Lateral Internal Sphincterotomy in Treatment of Chronic Anal Fissure: A Comparative Study
by: Hamid H. Sarhan
Published: (2012-08-01) -
Open versus closed lateral internal anal sphincterotomy in the management of chronic anal fissures: A prospective randomized study
by: Vivek Gupta, et al.
Published: (2014-10-01) -
Comparative study of laser versus open lateral internal sphincterotomy in the treatment of anal fissure
by: Rajkumar Verma, et al.
Published: (2023-11-01) -
The closed subcutaneous internal lateral sphincterotomy in patients with chronic anal fissure diagnosis
by: Dayan Cervantes-Peláez, et al.
Published: (2020-02-01) -
Treatment of chronic anal fissure: Botulinum toxin (Dysport) versus lateral internal anal sphincterotomy
by: Asgari M, et al.
Published: (2010-12-01)