Comparative analysis of co-processed starches prepared by three different methods

Co-processing is currently of interest in the generation of high-functionality excipients for tablet formulation. In the present study, comparative analysis of the powder and tableting properties of three co-processed starches prepared by three different methods was carried out. The co-processed exc...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Yonni Apeji, David Aluga, Olubunmi Olayemi, Chinyere Oparaeche, Sophie Anyebe, Michael Gamlen, Avosuahi Oyi
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: University of Huddersfield Press 2017-11-01
Series:British Journal of Pharmacy
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.bjpharm.org.uk/article/id/34/
_version_ 1797821712696344576
author Yonni Apeji
David Aluga
Olubunmi Olayemi
Chinyere Oparaeche
Sophie Anyebe
Michael Gamlen
Avosuahi Oyi
author_facet Yonni Apeji
David Aluga
Olubunmi Olayemi
Chinyere Oparaeche
Sophie Anyebe
Michael Gamlen
Avosuahi Oyi
author_sort Yonni Apeji
collection DOAJ
description Co-processing is currently of interest in the generation of high-functionality excipients for tablet formulation. In the present study, comparative analysis of the powder and tableting properties of three co-processed starches prepared by three different methods was carried out. The co-processed excipients consisting of maize starch (90%), acacia gum (7.5%) and colloidal silicon dioxide (2.5%) were prepared by co-dispersion (SAS-CD), co-fusion (SAS-CF) and co-granulation (SAS-CG). Powder properties of each co-processed excipient were characterized by measuring particle size, flow indices, particle density, dilution potential and lubricant sensitivity ratio. Heckel and Walker models were used to evaluate the compaction behaviour of the three co-processed starches. Tablets were produced with paracetamol as the model drug by direct compression on an eccentric Tablet Press fitted with 12 mm flat-faced punches and compressed at 216 MPa. The tablets were stored at room temperature for 24 h prior to evaluation. The results revealed that co-granulated co-processed excipient (SAS-CG) gave relatively better properties in terms of flow, compressibility, dilution potential, deformation, disintegration, crushing strength and friability. This study has shown that the method of co-processing influences the powder and tableting properties of the co-processed excipient.
first_indexed 2024-03-13T09:57:49Z
format Article
id doaj.art-915d85291b004b7d9870173cadc85701
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2058-8356
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-13T09:57:49Z
publishDate 2017-11-01
publisher University of Huddersfield Press
record_format Article
series British Journal of Pharmacy
spelling doaj.art-915d85291b004b7d9870173cadc857012023-05-23T14:59:22ZengUniversity of Huddersfield PressBritish Journal of Pharmacy2058-83562017-11-012110.5920/bjpharm.2017.08Comparative analysis of co-processed starches prepared by three different methodsYonni Apejihttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-3116-7570David AlugaOlubunmi OlayemiChinyere OparaecheSophie AnyebeMichael GamlenAvosuahi OyiCo-processing is currently of interest in the generation of high-functionality excipients for tablet formulation. In the present study, comparative analysis of the powder and tableting properties of three co-processed starches prepared by three different methods was carried out. The co-processed excipients consisting of maize starch (90%), acacia gum (7.5%) and colloidal silicon dioxide (2.5%) were prepared by co-dispersion (SAS-CD), co-fusion (SAS-CF) and co-granulation (SAS-CG). Powder properties of each co-processed excipient were characterized by measuring particle size, flow indices, particle density, dilution potential and lubricant sensitivity ratio. Heckel and Walker models were used to evaluate the compaction behaviour of the three co-processed starches. Tablets were produced with paracetamol as the model drug by direct compression on an eccentric Tablet Press fitted with 12 mm flat-faced punches and compressed at 216 MPa. The tablets were stored at room temperature for 24 h prior to evaluation. The results revealed that co-granulated co-processed excipient (SAS-CG) gave relatively better properties in terms of flow, compressibility, dilution potential, deformation, disintegration, crushing strength and friability. This study has shown that the method of co-processing influences the powder and tableting properties of the co-processed excipient.https://www.bjpharm.org.uk/article/id/34/pharmacyco-processingdirect compressiontabletexcipient
spellingShingle Yonni Apeji
David Aluga
Olubunmi Olayemi
Chinyere Oparaeche
Sophie Anyebe
Michael Gamlen
Avosuahi Oyi
Comparative analysis of co-processed starches prepared by three different methods
British Journal of Pharmacy
pharmacy
co-processing
direct compression
tablet
excipient
title Comparative analysis of co-processed starches prepared by three different methods
title_full Comparative analysis of co-processed starches prepared by three different methods
title_fullStr Comparative analysis of co-processed starches prepared by three different methods
title_full_unstemmed Comparative analysis of co-processed starches prepared by three different methods
title_short Comparative analysis of co-processed starches prepared by three different methods
title_sort comparative analysis of co processed starches prepared by three different methods
topic pharmacy
co-processing
direct compression
tablet
excipient
url https://www.bjpharm.org.uk/article/id/34/
work_keys_str_mv AT yonniapeji comparativeanalysisofcoprocessedstarchespreparedbythreedifferentmethods
AT davidaluga comparativeanalysisofcoprocessedstarchespreparedbythreedifferentmethods
AT olubunmiolayemi comparativeanalysisofcoprocessedstarchespreparedbythreedifferentmethods
AT chinyereoparaeche comparativeanalysisofcoprocessedstarchespreparedbythreedifferentmethods
AT sophieanyebe comparativeanalysisofcoprocessedstarchespreparedbythreedifferentmethods
AT michaelgamlen comparativeanalysisofcoprocessedstarchespreparedbythreedifferentmethods
AT avosuahioyi comparativeanalysisofcoprocessedstarchespreparedbythreedifferentmethods