Unveiling the Importance and Evolution of Design Components Through the “Tree of Blockchain”

This study covers the evolutionary development of blockchain technologies over the last 11 years (2009–2019) and sheds lights on potential areas of innovation in heretofore unexplored sub-components. For this purpose, we collected and analyzed detailed data on 107 different blockchain technologies a...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Florian Spychiger, Paolo Tasca, Claudio J. Tessone
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Frontiers Media S.A. 2021-01-01
Series:Frontiers in Blockchain
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fbloc.2020.613476/full
_version_ 1818715839158812672
author Florian Spychiger
Florian Spychiger
Paolo Tasca
Claudio J. Tessone
author_facet Florian Spychiger
Florian Spychiger
Paolo Tasca
Claudio J. Tessone
author_sort Florian Spychiger
collection DOAJ
description This study covers the evolutionary development of blockchain technologies over the last 11 years (2009–2019) and sheds lights on potential areas of innovation in heretofore unexplored sub-components. For this purpose, we collected and analyzed detailed data on 107 different blockchain technologies and studied their component-wise technological evolution. The diversity of their designs was captured by deconstructing the blockchains using the Tasca-Tessone taxonomy to build what we call the “tree of blockchain” composed of blockchain main and sub-components. With the support of information theory and phylogenetics, we found that most design explorations have been conducted within the components in the areas of consensus mechanisms and cryptographic primitives. We also show that some sub-components like Consensus Immutability and Failure Tolerance, Access and Control layer, and Access Supply Management have predictive power over other sub-components. We finally found that few dominant design models—the genetic driving clusters of Bitcoin, Ethereum, and XRP—influenced the evolutionary paths of most of the succeeding blockchains.
first_indexed 2024-12-17T19:09:44Z
format Article
id doaj.art-915f24d246a94500a985a54decffdf5a
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2624-7852
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-17T19:09:44Z
publishDate 2021-01-01
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format Article
series Frontiers in Blockchain
spelling doaj.art-915f24d246a94500a985a54decffdf5a2022-12-21T21:35:53ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Blockchain2624-78522021-01-01310.3389/fbloc.2020.613476613476Unveiling the Importance and Evolution of Design Components Through the “Tree of Blockchain”Florian Spychiger0Florian Spychiger1Paolo Tasca2Claudio J. Tessone3Center of Enterprise Development, School of Management and Law, Zurich University of Applied Sciences (ZHAW), Winterthur, SwitzerlandUniversity of Zurich (UZH) Blockchain Center and University Research Priority Program (URPP) Social Networks, Business Administration, University of Zurich, Zurich, SwitzerlandCentre for Blockchain Technologies, University College London, London, United KingdomUniversity of Zurich (UZH) Blockchain Center and University Research Priority Program (URPP) Social Networks, Business Administration, University of Zurich, Zurich, SwitzerlandThis study covers the evolutionary development of blockchain technologies over the last 11 years (2009–2019) and sheds lights on potential areas of innovation in heretofore unexplored sub-components. For this purpose, we collected and analyzed detailed data on 107 different blockchain technologies and studied their component-wise technological evolution. The diversity of their designs was captured by deconstructing the blockchains using the Tasca-Tessone taxonomy to build what we call the “tree of blockchain” composed of blockchain main and sub-components. With the support of information theory and phylogenetics, we found that most design explorations have been conducted within the components in the areas of consensus mechanisms and cryptographic primitives. We also show that some sub-components like Consensus Immutability and Failure Tolerance, Access and Control layer, and Access Supply Management have predictive power over other sub-components. We finally found that few dominant design models—the genetic driving clusters of Bitcoin, Ethereum, and XRP—influenced the evolutionary paths of most of the succeeding blockchains.https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fbloc.2020.613476/fullblockchaindistributed ledger technologytaxonomyinformation theoryblockchain analyticsinnovation
spellingShingle Florian Spychiger
Florian Spychiger
Paolo Tasca
Claudio J. Tessone
Unveiling the Importance and Evolution of Design Components Through the “Tree of Blockchain”
Frontiers in Blockchain
blockchain
distributed ledger technology
taxonomy
information theory
blockchain analytics
innovation
title Unveiling the Importance and Evolution of Design Components Through the “Tree of Blockchain”
title_full Unveiling the Importance and Evolution of Design Components Through the “Tree of Blockchain”
title_fullStr Unveiling the Importance and Evolution of Design Components Through the “Tree of Blockchain”
title_full_unstemmed Unveiling the Importance and Evolution of Design Components Through the “Tree of Blockchain”
title_short Unveiling the Importance and Evolution of Design Components Through the “Tree of Blockchain”
title_sort unveiling the importance and evolution of design components through the tree of blockchain
topic blockchain
distributed ledger technology
taxonomy
information theory
blockchain analytics
innovation
url https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fbloc.2020.613476/full
work_keys_str_mv AT florianspychiger unveilingtheimportanceandevolutionofdesigncomponentsthroughthetreeofblockchain
AT florianspychiger unveilingtheimportanceandevolutionofdesigncomponentsthroughthetreeofblockchain
AT paolotasca unveilingtheimportanceandevolutionofdesigncomponentsthroughthetreeofblockchain
AT claudiojtessone unveilingtheimportanceandevolutionofdesigncomponentsthroughthetreeofblockchain