Pausing at the Brink of Interdisciplinarity: Power and Knowledge at the Meeting of Social and Biophysical Science
Interdisciplinary environmental research has been deemed essential to addressing the dynamics of coupled social-biophysical systems. Although decades of scholarship in science and technology studies (STS) take the analysis of interdisciplinarity out of the realm of anecdote, there is almost no overl...
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Resilience Alliance
2007-06-01
|
| Series: | Ecology and Society |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol12/iss1/art20/ |
| _version_ | 1831585036909936640 |
|---|---|
| author | Dena P. MacMynowski |
| author_facet | Dena P. MacMynowski |
| author_sort | Dena P. MacMynowski |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | Interdisciplinary environmental research has been deemed essential to addressing the dynamics of coupled social-biophysical systems. Although decades of scholarship in science and technology studies (STS) take the analysis of interdisciplinarity out of the realm of anecdote, there is almost no overlap between this literature and discussions of interdisciplinarity in ecology-oriented journals. The goals of researchers in these areas are quite different, and thus far, their analyses of interdisciplinarity have been incommensurate with each other's purposes. To introduce an STS perspective into how environmental scientists think about interdisciplinarity, I argue that biophysical and social scientists are not just bringing information and different understandings of biophysical and social systems to the intellectual table. Those knowledge claims have differential power associated with them: within the sciences, between social and biophysical science, and between science and society. Power can manifest in many ways, e.g., individual scientific status, the most accepted account of an environmental problem, inclusion or exclusion of researchers, or perceived relevance of research to policy decisions. I propose four possible scenarios: conflict, tolerant ambivalence, mutual identification, cooperation, and fundamental transformation for how an interdisciplinary undertaking might unfold. Then, to constructively confront the relationship between power and knowledge, I outline a three stage process to enhance the transparent development of interdisciplinary research. First, there is differentiation of the analytical elements of the research, then clarification of purposes, and finally, the steps toward intellectual synthesis. As core differences are encountered, e.g., "subjectivity" vs. "objectivity," active engagement with these issues will be essential to successful communication, collaboration, and innovation. |
| first_indexed | 2024-12-17T21:11:04Z |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj.art-916a9a08985e4399a026d3fcc3109d4d |
| institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
| issn | 1708-3087 |
| language | English |
| last_indexed | 2024-12-17T21:11:04Z |
| publishDate | 2007-06-01 |
| publisher | Resilience Alliance |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Ecology and Society |
| spelling | doaj.art-916a9a08985e4399a026d3fcc3109d4d2022-12-21T21:32:28ZengResilience AllianceEcology and Society1708-30872007-06-011212010.5751/ES-02009-1201202009Pausing at the Brink of Interdisciplinarity: Power and Knowledge at the Meeting of Social and Biophysical ScienceDena P. MacMynowski0Stanford UniversityInterdisciplinary environmental research has been deemed essential to addressing the dynamics of coupled social-biophysical systems. Although decades of scholarship in science and technology studies (STS) take the analysis of interdisciplinarity out of the realm of anecdote, there is almost no overlap between this literature and discussions of interdisciplinarity in ecology-oriented journals. The goals of researchers in these areas are quite different, and thus far, their analyses of interdisciplinarity have been incommensurate with each other's purposes. To introduce an STS perspective into how environmental scientists think about interdisciplinarity, I argue that biophysical and social scientists are not just bringing information and different understandings of biophysical and social systems to the intellectual table. Those knowledge claims have differential power associated with them: within the sciences, between social and biophysical science, and between science and society. Power can manifest in many ways, e.g., individual scientific status, the most accepted account of an environmental problem, inclusion or exclusion of researchers, or perceived relevance of research to policy decisions. I propose four possible scenarios: conflict, tolerant ambivalence, mutual identification, cooperation, and fundamental transformation for how an interdisciplinary undertaking might unfold. Then, to constructively confront the relationship between power and knowledge, I outline a three stage process to enhance the transparent development of interdisciplinary research. First, there is differentiation of the analytical elements of the research, then clarification of purposes, and finally, the steps toward intellectual synthesis. As core differences are encountered, e.g., "subjectivity" vs. "objectivity," active engagement with these issues will be essential to successful communication, collaboration, and innovation.http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol12/iss1/art20/interdisciplinarityphilosophy of sciencepowerpower/knowledgesocial-biophysical systemsresearch methodstransdisciplinarity. |
| spellingShingle | Dena P. MacMynowski Pausing at the Brink of Interdisciplinarity: Power and Knowledge at the Meeting of Social and Biophysical Science Ecology and Society interdisciplinarity philosophy of science power power/knowledge social-biophysical systems research methods transdisciplinarity. |
| title | Pausing at the Brink of Interdisciplinarity: Power and Knowledge at the Meeting of Social and Biophysical Science |
| title_full | Pausing at the Brink of Interdisciplinarity: Power and Knowledge at the Meeting of Social and Biophysical Science |
| title_fullStr | Pausing at the Brink of Interdisciplinarity: Power and Knowledge at the Meeting of Social and Biophysical Science |
| title_full_unstemmed | Pausing at the Brink of Interdisciplinarity: Power and Knowledge at the Meeting of Social and Biophysical Science |
| title_short | Pausing at the Brink of Interdisciplinarity: Power and Knowledge at the Meeting of Social and Biophysical Science |
| title_sort | pausing at the brink of interdisciplinarity power and knowledge at the meeting of social and biophysical science |
| topic | interdisciplinarity philosophy of science power power/knowledge social-biophysical systems research methods transdisciplinarity. |
| url | http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol12/iss1/art20/ |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT denapmacmynowski pausingatthebrinkofinterdisciplinaritypowerandknowledgeatthemeetingofsocialandbiophysicalscience |