Comprehensive dose–response study of pulsed field ablation using a circular catheter compared with radiofrequency ablation for pulmonary vein isolation: A preclinical study

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Jonathan C. Hsu, MD, MAS, FHRS, Rajesh S. Banker, MD, Douglas N. Gibson, MD, Tara Gomez, PhD, Dror Berman, BSc, Keshava Datta, PhD, Qi Chen, PhD, Shephal K. Doshi, MD
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Elsevier 2023-10-01
Series:Heart Rhythm O2
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666501823002246
_version_ 1797653901826064384
author Jonathan C. Hsu, MD, MAS, FHRS
Rajesh S. Banker, MD
Douglas N. Gibson, MD
Tara Gomez, PhD
Dror Berman, BSc
Keshava Datta, PhD
Qi Chen, PhD
Shephal K. Doshi, MD
author_facet Jonathan C. Hsu, MD, MAS, FHRS
Rajesh S. Banker, MD
Douglas N. Gibson, MD
Tara Gomez, PhD
Dror Berman, BSc
Keshava Datta, PhD
Qi Chen, PhD
Shephal K. Doshi, MD
author_sort Jonathan C. Hsu, MD, MAS, FHRS
collection DOAJ
first_indexed 2024-03-11T16:51:33Z
format Article
id doaj.art-916ca4322477487a832ea8a8fd80ea5b
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2666-5018
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-11T16:51:33Z
publishDate 2023-10-01
publisher Elsevier
record_format Article
series Heart Rhythm O2
spelling doaj.art-916ca4322477487a832ea8a8fd80ea5b2023-10-21T04:23:17ZengElsevierHeart Rhythm O22666-50182023-10-01410662667Comprehensive dose–response study of pulsed field ablation using a circular catheter compared with radiofrequency ablation for pulmonary vein isolation: A preclinical studyJonathan C. Hsu, MD, MAS, FHRS0Rajesh S. Banker, MD1Douglas N. Gibson, MD2Tara Gomez, PhD3Dror Berman, BSc4Keshava Datta, PhD5Qi Chen, PhD6Shephal K. Doshi, MD7Cardiac Electrophysiology Section, Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine University of California San Diego, La Jolla, California; Address reprint requests and correspondence: Dr Jonathan C. Hsu, Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of California, San Diego, 9452 Medical Center Dr, MC7411, La Jolla, CA 92037.Premier Cardiology, Newport Beach, CaliforniaInterventional Electrophysiology, Scripps Clinic and Prebys Cardiovascular Institute, La Jolla, CaliforniaBiosense Webster, Irvine, CaliforniaBiosense Webster, Irvine, CaliforniaBiosense Webster, Irvine, CaliforniaBiosense Webster, Irvine, CaliforniaPacific Heart Institute, Santa Monica, Californiahttp://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666501823002246Catheter ablationPulmonary vein isolationPulsed field ablationIrreversible electroporationPreclinical model
spellingShingle Jonathan C. Hsu, MD, MAS, FHRS
Rajesh S. Banker, MD
Douglas N. Gibson, MD
Tara Gomez, PhD
Dror Berman, BSc
Keshava Datta, PhD
Qi Chen, PhD
Shephal K. Doshi, MD
Comprehensive dose–response study of pulsed field ablation using a circular catheter compared with radiofrequency ablation for pulmonary vein isolation: A preclinical study
Heart Rhythm O2
Catheter ablation
Pulmonary vein isolation
Pulsed field ablation
Irreversible electroporation
Preclinical model
title Comprehensive dose–response study of pulsed field ablation using a circular catheter compared with radiofrequency ablation for pulmonary vein isolation: A preclinical study
title_full Comprehensive dose–response study of pulsed field ablation using a circular catheter compared with radiofrequency ablation for pulmonary vein isolation: A preclinical study
title_fullStr Comprehensive dose–response study of pulsed field ablation using a circular catheter compared with radiofrequency ablation for pulmonary vein isolation: A preclinical study
title_full_unstemmed Comprehensive dose–response study of pulsed field ablation using a circular catheter compared with radiofrequency ablation for pulmonary vein isolation: A preclinical study
title_short Comprehensive dose–response study of pulsed field ablation using a circular catheter compared with radiofrequency ablation for pulmonary vein isolation: A preclinical study
title_sort comprehensive dose response study of pulsed field ablation using a circular catheter compared with radiofrequency ablation for pulmonary vein isolation a preclinical study
topic Catheter ablation
Pulmonary vein isolation
Pulsed field ablation
Irreversible electroporation
Preclinical model
url http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666501823002246
work_keys_str_mv AT jonathanchsumdmasfhrs comprehensivedoseresponsestudyofpulsedfieldablationusingacircularcathetercomparedwithradiofrequencyablationforpulmonaryveinisolationapreclinicalstudy
AT rajeshsbankermd comprehensivedoseresponsestudyofpulsedfieldablationusingacircularcathetercomparedwithradiofrequencyablationforpulmonaryveinisolationapreclinicalstudy
AT douglasngibsonmd comprehensivedoseresponsestudyofpulsedfieldablationusingacircularcathetercomparedwithradiofrequencyablationforpulmonaryveinisolationapreclinicalstudy
AT taragomezphd comprehensivedoseresponsestudyofpulsedfieldablationusingacircularcathetercomparedwithradiofrequencyablationforpulmonaryveinisolationapreclinicalstudy
AT drorbermanbsc comprehensivedoseresponsestudyofpulsedfieldablationusingacircularcathetercomparedwithradiofrequencyablationforpulmonaryveinisolationapreclinicalstudy
AT keshavadattaphd comprehensivedoseresponsestudyofpulsedfieldablationusingacircularcathetercomparedwithradiofrequencyablationforpulmonaryveinisolationapreclinicalstudy
AT qichenphd comprehensivedoseresponsestudyofpulsedfieldablationusingacircularcathetercomparedwithradiofrequencyablationforpulmonaryveinisolationapreclinicalstudy
AT shephalkdoshimd comprehensivedoseresponsestudyofpulsedfieldablationusingacircularcathetercomparedwithradiofrequencyablationforpulmonaryveinisolationapreclinicalstudy