Historical Observations for Improving Reanalyses

Historical reanalyses have become a widely used resource for analyzing weather and climate processes and their changes over time. In this article I explore how further historical observations could support reanalyses and lead to products that reach further back in time or have a better quality. Usin...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Stefan Brönnimann
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Frontiers Media S.A. 2022-04-01
Series:Frontiers in Climate
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fclim.2022.880473/full
_version_ 1817991997127917568
author Stefan Brönnimann
author_facet Stefan Brönnimann
author_sort Stefan Brönnimann
collection DOAJ
description Historical reanalyses have become a widely used resource for analyzing weather and climate processes and their changes over time. In this article I explore how further historical observations could support reanalyses and lead to products that reach further back in time or have a better quality. Using an off-line Ensemble Kalman Filter I estimate improvements arising from assimilating additional observations into the ensemble of the “Twentieth Century Reanalysis” Version 3 (20CRv3). I demonstrate this for three case studies and evaluate them using independent data and a leave-one-out approach. For Europe in 1807, assimilating additional pressure data improves the skill for pressure but slightly decreases it for temperature, while assimilating temperature data, a variable that is not assimilated in 20CRv3, improves the skill for temperature but slightly decreases it for pressure. Assimilating both leads to substantially increased skill in a leave-one-out approach. For Sub-Saharan Africa in 1877/78, assimilating ship-based pressure observations as well as land station data, albeit extremely sparse, leads to a slight improvement over the entire domain. Finally, for Europe in 1926/27, assimilating upper air and total column ozone observations both lead to improvements in geopotential height and wind in the middle troposphere and in total column ozone, but with little or no effect in the lower troposphere. This is because 20CRv3 is already close to perfect over Europe in this period. The article shows how additional observations could improve historical reanalyses. A backward extension to the 1780s seems possible, but further data rescue efforts are necessary. For some applications, improved fields as generated by the offline assimilation presented in this study could be useful.
first_indexed 2024-04-14T01:20:48Z
format Article
id doaj.art-917c5567709648d6b0bb13760608855b
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2624-9553
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-14T01:20:48Z
publishDate 2022-04-01
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format Article
series Frontiers in Climate
spelling doaj.art-917c5567709648d6b0bb13760608855b2022-12-22T02:20:40ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Climate2624-95532022-04-01410.3389/fclim.2022.880473880473Historical Observations for Improving ReanalysesStefan BrönnimannHistorical reanalyses have become a widely used resource for analyzing weather and climate processes and their changes over time. In this article I explore how further historical observations could support reanalyses and lead to products that reach further back in time or have a better quality. Using an off-line Ensemble Kalman Filter I estimate improvements arising from assimilating additional observations into the ensemble of the “Twentieth Century Reanalysis” Version 3 (20CRv3). I demonstrate this for three case studies and evaluate them using independent data and a leave-one-out approach. For Europe in 1807, assimilating additional pressure data improves the skill for pressure but slightly decreases it for temperature, while assimilating temperature data, a variable that is not assimilated in 20CRv3, improves the skill for temperature but slightly decreases it for pressure. Assimilating both leads to substantially increased skill in a leave-one-out approach. For Sub-Saharan Africa in 1877/78, assimilating ship-based pressure observations as well as land station data, albeit extremely sparse, leads to a slight improvement over the entire domain. Finally, for Europe in 1926/27, assimilating upper air and total column ozone observations both lead to improvements in geopotential height and wind in the middle troposphere and in total column ozone, but with little or no effect in the lower troposphere. This is because 20CRv3 is already close to perfect over Europe in this period. The article shows how additional observations could improve historical reanalyses. A backward extension to the 1780s seems possible, but further data rescue efforts are necessary. For some applications, improved fields as generated by the offline assimilation presented in this study could be useful.https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fclim.2022.880473/fulldata assimilationhistorical observationsre-analyses of the twentieth centuryship observationsupper-air data
spellingShingle Stefan Brönnimann
Historical Observations for Improving Reanalyses
Frontiers in Climate
data assimilation
historical observations
re-analyses of the twentieth century
ship observations
upper-air data
title Historical Observations for Improving Reanalyses
title_full Historical Observations for Improving Reanalyses
title_fullStr Historical Observations for Improving Reanalyses
title_full_unstemmed Historical Observations for Improving Reanalyses
title_short Historical Observations for Improving Reanalyses
title_sort historical observations for improving reanalyses
topic data assimilation
historical observations
re-analyses of the twentieth century
ship observations
upper-air data
url https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fclim.2022.880473/full
work_keys_str_mv AT stefanbronnimann historicalobservationsforimprovingreanalyses