Conceptual Metaphors and Their Functions in the Political Discourse of the Government of Prudence and Hope

The use of metaphor as a linguistic strategy has long been considered by politicians around the world. The main purpose of the present study is to investigate the function of conceptual metaphor from the perspective of Lakoff and Johnson (1980) in the speeches of three members of the Government of p...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Golnaz Ghafourisaleh, Foroogh Kazemi
Format: Article
Language:fas
Published: Allameh Tabataba'i University Press 2021-03-01
Series:̒Ilm-i Zabān
Subjects:
Online Access:https://ls.atu.ac.ir/article_12988_93be10936c7ddf343de9e8bd5aaa3f12.pdf
_version_ 1797369111376822272
author Golnaz Ghafourisaleh
Foroogh Kazemi
author_facet Golnaz Ghafourisaleh
Foroogh Kazemi
author_sort Golnaz Ghafourisaleh
collection DOAJ
description The use of metaphor as a linguistic strategy has long been considered by politicians around the world. The main purpose of the present study is to investigate the function of conceptual metaphor from the perspective of Lakoff and Johnson (1980) in the speeches of three members of the Government of prudence and hope: Mr. Rouhani, Jahangiri and Zarif. The main issue of the research is to show how conceptual metaphors are expressed in the words of these political authorities and how their function in organizing political realities can be explained. For this purpose, we have collected the data in a library research method and examined it analytically. The results indicate that political metaphors are used in different source domains: route, personification (humans, animals and plants), war, sports, buildings and natural phenomena, among which, the route is the most And the natural phenomena has had the least use. The results show that metaphor has an important rhetorical and persuasive usage in political discourse and plays an important role in conveying the political messages of prudence and hope government’s members. What is clear is that metaphor, in addition to facilitating the analysis of political issues for the audience, has given these politicians the opportunity to more easily explain their issues in order to arouse the audience's emotions. With the help of  metaphor, they try to highlight or hide some aspects of political discourse so that they can persuade the audience to apply their beliefs. It should be said that conceptual metaphors with different appearances have been manifested in line with the purposes of the government of Prudence and Hope discourse, called Moderation discourse. Thus, metaphors can be used by journalists, political analysts, and political discourse researchers as an effective and powerful tool to analyze the messages of political officials and facilitate the decoding of their words. Therefore, the results of this study can be useful for this group of experts and ultimately to measure the political pulse of the country.
first_indexed 2024-03-08T17:42:02Z
format Article
id doaj.art-917e24643ae6430d8c5efc5b1b24018b
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2423-7728
2538-2551
language fas
last_indexed 2024-03-08T17:42:02Z
publishDate 2021-03-01
publisher Allameh Tabataba'i University Press
record_format Article
series ̒Ilm-i Zabān
spelling doaj.art-917e24643ae6430d8c5efc5b1b24018b2024-01-02T11:01:58ZfasAllameh Tabataba'i University Press̒Ilm-i Zabān2423-77282538-25512021-03-0181330533310.22054/ls.2021.56755.140312988Conceptual Metaphors and Their Functions in the Political Discourse of the Government of Prudence and HopeGolnaz Ghafourisaleh0Foroogh Kazemi1Ph.D student of Linguistics, Department of Linguistics, Central Tehran Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, IranAssociate Professor of Linguistics, Department of Linguistics, Central Tehran Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, IranThe use of metaphor as a linguistic strategy has long been considered by politicians around the world. The main purpose of the present study is to investigate the function of conceptual metaphor from the perspective of Lakoff and Johnson (1980) in the speeches of three members of the Government of prudence and hope: Mr. Rouhani, Jahangiri and Zarif. The main issue of the research is to show how conceptual metaphors are expressed in the words of these political authorities and how their function in organizing political realities can be explained. For this purpose, we have collected the data in a library research method and examined it analytically. The results indicate that political metaphors are used in different source domains: route, personification (humans, animals and plants), war, sports, buildings and natural phenomena, among which, the route is the most And the natural phenomena has had the least use. The results show that metaphor has an important rhetorical and persuasive usage in political discourse and plays an important role in conveying the political messages of prudence and hope government’s members. What is clear is that metaphor, in addition to facilitating the analysis of political issues for the audience, has given these politicians the opportunity to more easily explain their issues in order to arouse the audience's emotions. With the help of  metaphor, they try to highlight or hide some aspects of political discourse so that they can persuade the audience to apply their beliefs. It should be said that conceptual metaphors with different appearances have been manifested in line with the purposes of the government of Prudence and Hope discourse, called Moderation discourse. Thus, metaphors can be used by journalists, political analysts, and political discourse researchers as an effective and powerful tool to analyze the messages of political officials and facilitate the decoding of their words. Therefore, the results of this study can be useful for this group of experts and ultimately to measure the political pulse of the country.https://ls.atu.ac.ir/article_12988_93be10936c7ddf343de9e8bd5aaa3f12.pdfmetaphorconceptual metaphorlakoff and johnson’s point of viewpolitical discoursegovernment of prudence and hope
spellingShingle Golnaz Ghafourisaleh
Foroogh Kazemi
Conceptual Metaphors and Their Functions in the Political Discourse of the Government of Prudence and Hope
̒Ilm-i Zabān
metaphor
conceptual metaphor
lakoff and johnson’s point of view
political discourse
government of prudence and hope
title Conceptual Metaphors and Their Functions in the Political Discourse of the Government of Prudence and Hope
title_full Conceptual Metaphors and Their Functions in the Political Discourse of the Government of Prudence and Hope
title_fullStr Conceptual Metaphors and Their Functions in the Political Discourse of the Government of Prudence and Hope
title_full_unstemmed Conceptual Metaphors and Their Functions in the Political Discourse of the Government of Prudence and Hope
title_short Conceptual Metaphors and Their Functions in the Political Discourse of the Government of Prudence and Hope
title_sort conceptual metaphors and their functions in the political discourse of the government of prudence and hope
topic metaphor
conceptual metaphor
lakoff and johnson’s point of view
political discourse
government of prudence and hope
url https://ls.atu.ac.ir/article_12988_93be10936c7ddf343de9e8bd5aaa3f12.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT golnazghafourisaleh conceptualmetaphorsandtheirfunctionsinthepoliticaldiscourseofthegovernmentofprudenceandhope
AT forooghkazemi conceptualmetaphorsandtheirfunctionsinthepoliticaldiscourseofthegovernmentofprudenceandhope