Effects of timed artificial insemination following estrus synchronization in postpartum beef cattle
The objectives of this study were to evaluate estrus response and pregnancy rates resulting from timed artificial insemination (AI) following estrus synchronization using CIDR in postpartum beef cattle. A total of 100 cows were randomly divided into three groups. Groups 1, 2 and 3 were artificially...
Main Authors: | , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Tripoli University
2012-01-01
|
Series: | Open Veterinary Journal |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://www.openveterinaryjournal.com/2012/OVJ-046-11-11%20A.%20Malik%20et%20al.pdf |
_version_ | 1828128478628675584 |
---|---|
author | M. Sabri A. Kasim Y. Rosnina H. Wahid A. Malik |
author_facet | M. Sabri A. Kasim Y. Rosnina H. Wahid A. Malik |
author_sort | M. Sabri |
collection | DOAJ |
description | The objectives of this study were to evaluate estrus response and pregnancy rates resulting from timed artificial insemination (AI) following estrus synchronization using CIDR in postpartum beef cattle. A total of 100 cows were randomly divided into three groups. Groups 1, 2 and 3 were artificially inseminated at 48-50 h (n=30), 53-55 h (n=30) and 58-60 h (n=40) after CIDR removal, respectively. Estrus synchronization was carried out using a CIDR containing 1.38 mg progesterone. All cows were given 2 mg estradiol benzoate, intramuscularly on the day of CIDR insertion (D 0). The CIDR was removed after 8 days and 125 μg of prostaglandin F2α (PGF2α) was injected intramuscularly. One day after CIDR removal all cows were given 1 mg of estradiol benzoate intramuscularly (D 9). Cows were observed visually for estrus after removal of CIDR. Between 30 and 32 days after timed AI, pregnancy was determined using transrectal ultrasonography. The first estrus observation which is approximately 32 h after CIDR removal showed no significant difference (P>0.05) among the three groups. The onset response of estrus after 32 h removal of CIDR was less than 10% in all three groups 6.6% (G1), 6.8% (G2) and 7.3% (G3). Furthermore, percentages of estrus response (D 10) following CIDR removal were 76.6%, 75.0% and 77.5%. The difference between on D 9 and D 10 estrus response were statistically significant (P<0.05). The pregnancy rates were 23.3% (G1), 26.6% (G2) and 37.5% (G3), which were not significant (P>0.05). |
first_indexed | 2024-04-11T16:03:51Z |
format | Article |
id | doaj.art-91818c83fb6b49acbbdce13409c62313 |
institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
issn | 2218-6050 |
language | English |
last_indexed | 2024-04-11T16:03:51Z |
publishDate | 2012-01-01 |
publisher | Tripoli University |
record_format | Article |
series | Open Veterinary Journal |
spelling | doaj.art-91818c83fb6b49acbbdce13409c623132022-12-22T04:14:52ZengTripoli UniversityOpen Veterinary Journal2218-60502012-01-01215Effects of timed artificial insemination following estrus synchronization in postpartum beef cattleM. SabriA. KasimY. RosninaH. WahidA. MalikThe objectives of this study were to evaluate estrus response and pregnancy rates resulting from timed artificial insemination (AI) following estrus synchronization using CIDR in postpartum beef cattle. A total of 100 cows were randomly divided into three groups. Groups 1, 2 and 3 were artificially inseminated at 48-50 h (n=30), 53-55 h (n=30) and 58-60 h (n=40) after CIDR removal, respectively. Estrus synchronization was carried out using a CIDR containing 1.38 mg progesterone. All cows were given 2 mg estradiol benzoate, intramuscularly on the day of CIDR insertion (D 0). The CIDR was removed after 8 days and 125 μg of prostaglandin F2α (PGF2α) was injected intramuscularly. One day after CIDR removal all cows were given 1 mg of estradiol benzoate intramuscularly (D 9). Cows were observed visually for estrus after removal of CIDR. Between 30 and 32 days after timed AI, pregnancy was determined using transrectal ultrasonography. The first estrus observation which is approximately 32 h after CIDR removal showed no significant difference (P>0.05) among the three groups. The onset response of estrus after 32 h removal of CIDR was less than 10% in all three groups 6.6% (G1), 6.8% (G2) and 7.3% (G3). Furthermore, percentages of estrus response (D 10) following CIDR removal were 76.6%, 75.0% and 77.5%. The difference between on D 9 and D 10 estrus response were statistically significant (P<0.05). The pregnancy rates were 23.3% (G1), 26.6% (G2) and 37.5% (G3), which were not significant (P>0.05).http://www.openveterinaryjournal.com/2012/OVJ-046-11-11%20A.%20Malik%20et%20al.pdfCowsEstrus synchronizationCIDRTimed artificial insemination (TAI)Pregnancy rate |
spellingShingle | M. Sabri A. Kasim Y. Rosnina H. Wahid A. Malik Effects of timed artificial insemination following estrus synchronization in postpartum beef cattle Open Veterinary Journal Cows Estrus synchronization CIDR Timed artificial insemination (TAI) Pregnancy rate |
title | Effects of timed artificial insemination following estrus synchronization in postpartum beef cattle |
title_full | Effects of timed artificial insemination following estrus synchronization in postpartum beef cattle |
title_fullStr | Effects of timed artificial insemination following estrus synchronization in postpartum beef cattle |
title_full_unstemmed | Effects of timed artificial insemination following estrus synchronization in postpartum beef cattle |
title_short | Effects of timed artificial insemination following estrus synchronization in postpartum beef cattle |
title_sort | effects of timed artificial insemination following estrus synchronization in postpartum beef cattle |
topic | Cows Estrus synchronization CIDR Timed artificial insemination (TAI) Pregnancy rate |
url | http://www.openveterinaryjournal.com/2012/OVJ-046-11-11%20A.%20Malik%20et%20al.pdf |
work_keys_str_mv | AT msabri effectsoftimedartificialinseminationfollowingestrussynchronizationinpostpartumbeefcattle AT akasim effectsoftimedartificialinseminationfollowingestrussynchronizationinpostpartumbeefcattle AT yrosnina effectsoftimedartificialinseminationfollowingestrussynchronizationinpostpartumbeefcattle AT hwahid effectsoftimedartificialinseminationfollowingestrussynchronizationinpostpartumbeefcattle AT amalik effectsoftimedartificialinseminationfollowingestrussynchronizationinpostpartumbeefcattle |