A Contextualising, Socio-technical Definition of Technology: Learning from Ancient Greece and Foucault

The task of defining technology has had an unhappy history. It seems that agreement about what technology is—and even if a definition should be sought at all—has not been reached. This article argues that a definition is possible and should be sought. The etymology of the word technology suggests th...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: DAVID ROONEY
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Pluto Journals 1997-11-01
Series:Prometheus
Online Access:https://www.scienceopen.com/hosted-document?doi=10.1080/08109029708632084
_version_ 1797730198350725120
author DAVID ROONEY
author_facet DAVID ROONEY
author_sort DAVID ROONEY
collection DOAJ
description The task of defining technology has had an unhappy history. It seems that agreement about what technology is—and even if a definition should be sought at all—has not been reached. This article argues that a definition is possible and should be sought. The etymology of the word technology suggests that it has long had a socio-technical meaning and, furthermore, Foucault's definition of four types of technologies suggests a framework in which a socio-technical definition of technology can be usefully detailed. In this case the definition helps to provide a broad and deeply contextual understanding of what technology is (in its tangible and intangible forms), the processes which it influences and the processes which influence it.
first_indexed 2024-03-12T11:40:41Z
format Article
id doaj.art-91820e9c5b914f2f8479a160d45d24dc
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 0810-9028
1470-1030
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-12T11:40:41Z
publishDate 1997-11-01
publisher Pluto Journals
record_format Article
series Prometheus
spelling doaj.art-91820e9c5b914f2f8479a160d45d24dc2023-08-31T16:00:36ZengPluto JournalsPrometheus0810-90281470-10301997-11-0115339940710.1080/08109029708632084A Contextualising, Socio-technical Definition of Technology: Learning from Ancient Greece and FoucaultDAVID ROONEYThe task of defining technology has had an unhappy history. It seems that agreement about what technology is—and even if a definition should be sought at all—has not been reached. This article argues that a definition is possible and should be sought. The etymology of the word technology suggests that it has long had a socio-technical meaning and, furthermore, Foucault's definition of four types of technologies suggests a framework in which a socio-technical definition of technology can be usefully detailed. In this case the definition helps to provide a broad and deeply contextual understanding of what technology is (in its tangible and intangible forms), the processes which it influences and the processes which influence it.https://www.scienceopen.com/hosted-document?doi=10.1080/08109029708632084
spellingShingle DAVID ROONEY
A Contextualising, Socio-technical Definition of Technology: Learning from Ancient Greece and Foucault
Prometheus
title A Contextualising, Socio-technical Definition of Technology: Learning from Ancient Greece and Foucault
title_full A Contextualising, Socio-technical Definition of Technology: Learning from Ancient Greece and Foucault
title_fullStr A Contextualising, Socio-technical Definition of Technology: Learning from Ancient Greece and Foucault
title_full_unstemmed A Contextualising, Socio-technical Definition of Technology: Learning from Ancient Greece and Foucault
title_short A Contextualising, Socio-technical Definition of Technology: Learning from Ancient Greece and Foucault
title_sort contextualising socio technical definition of technology learning from ancient greece and foucault
url https://www.scienceopen.com/hosted-document?doi=10.1080/08109029708632084
work_keys_str_mv AT davidrooney acontextualisingsociotechnicaldefinitionoftechnologylearningfromancientgreeceandfoucault
AT davidrooney contextualisingsociotechnicaldefinitionoftechnologylearningfromancientgreeceandfoucault