Determination of aortic stiffness using 4D flow cardiovascular magnetic resonance - a population-based study

Abstract Background Increased aortic stiffness is an independent predictor of cardiovascular disease. Optimal measurement is highly beneficial for the detection of atherosclerosis and the management of patients at risk. Thus, it was our purpose to selectively measure aortic stiffness using a novel i...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Andreas Harloff, Hanieh Mirzaee, Thomas Lodemann, Paul Hagenlocher, Thomas Wehrum, Judith Stuplich, Anja Hennemuth, Jürgen Hennig, Sebastian Grundmann, Werner Vach
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Elsevier 2018-06-01
Series:Journal of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance
Subjects:
Online Access:http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12968-018-0461-z
_version_ 1797203717324275712
author Andreas Harloff
Hanieh Mirzaee
Thomas Lodemann
Paul Hagenlocher
Thomas Wehrum
Judith Stuplich
Anja Hennemuth
Jürgen Hennig
Sebastian Grundmann
Werner Vach
author_facet Andreas Harloff
Hanieh Mirzaee
Thomas Lodemann
Paul Hagenlocher
Thomas Wehrum
Judith Stuplich
Anja Hennemuth
Jürgen Hennig
Sebastian Grundmann
Werner Vach
author_sort Andreas Harloff
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Background Increased aortic stiffness is an independent predictor of cardiovascular disease. Optimal measurement is highly beneficial for the detection of atherosclerosis and the management of patients at risk. Thus, it was our purpose to selectively measure aortic stiffness using a novel imaging method and to provide reference values from a population-based study. Methods One hundred twenty six inhabitants of Freiburg, Germany, between 20 and 80 years prospectively underwent 3 Tesla cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) of the thoracic aorta. 4D flow CMR (spatial/temporal resolution 2mm3/20ms) was executed to calculate aortic pulse wave velocity (PWV) in m/s using dedicated software. In addition, we calculated distensibility coefficients (DC) using 2D CINE CMR imaging of the ascending (AAo) and descending aorta (DAo). Segmental aortic diameter and thickness of aortic plaques were determined by 3D T1 weighted CMR (spatial resolution 1mm3). Results PWV increased from 4.93 ± 0.54 m/s in 20–30 year-old to 8.06 ± 1.03 m/s in 70–80 year-old subjects. PWV was significantly lower in women compared to men (p < 0.0001). Increased blood pressure (systolic r = 0.36, p < 0.0001; diastolic r = 0.33, p = 0.0001; mean arterial pressure r = 0.37, p < 0.0001) correlated with PWV after adjustment for age and gender. Finally, PWV increased with increasing diameter of the aorta (ascending aorta r = 0.20, p = 0.026; aortic arch r = 0.24, p = 0.009; descending aorta r = 0.26, p = 0.004). Correlation of PWV and DC of the AAo and DAo or the mean of both was high (r = 0.69, r = 0.68, r = 0.73; p < 0.001). Conclusions 4D flow CMR was successfully applied to calculate aortic PWV and thus aortic stiffness. Findings showed a high correlation with distensibility coefficients representing local compliance of the aorta. Our novel method and reference data for PWV may provide a reliable biomarker for the identification of patients with underlying cardiovascular disease and optimal guidance of future treatment in studies or clinical routine.
first_indexed 2024-04-24T08:23:46Z
format Article
id doaj.art-9189bebd23a9427db3ba3bb852fb9bfe
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1532-429X
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-24T08:23:46Z
publishDate 2018-06-01
publisher Elsevier
record_format Article
series Journal of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance
spelling doaj.art-9189bebd23a9427db3ba3bb852fb9bfe2024-04-16T23:48:10ZengElsevierJournal of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance1532-429X2018-06-0120111110.1186/s12968-018-0461-zDetermination of aortic stiffness using 4D flow cardiovascular magnetic resonance - a population-based studyAndreas Harloff0Hanieh Mirzaee1Thomas Lodemann2Paul Hagenlocher3Thomas Wehrum4Judith Stuplich5Anja Hennemuth6Jürgen Hennig7Sebastian Grundmann8Werner Vach9Department of Neurology, Medical Center – University of FreiburgFraunhofer MEVISDepartment of Neurology, Medical Center – University of FreiburgDepartment of Neurology, Medical Center – University of FreiburgDepartment of Neurology, Medical Center – University of FreiburgFaculty of Medicine, University of FreiburgFraunhofer MEVISFaculty of Medicine, University of FreiburgFaculty of Medicine, University of FreiburgFaculty of Medicine, University of FreiburgAbstract Background Increased aortic stiffness is an independent predictor of cardiovascular disease. Optimal measurement is highly beneficial for the detection of atherosclerosis and the management of patients at risk. Thus, it was our purpose to selectively measure aortic stiffness using a novel imaging method and to provide reference values from a population-based study. Methods One hundred twenty six inhabitants of Freiburg, Germany, between 20 and 80 years prospectively underwent 3 Tesla cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) of the thoracic aorta. 4D flow CMR (spatial/temporal resolution 2mm3/20ms) was executed to calculate aortic pulse wave velocity (PWV) in m/s using dedicated software. In addition, we calculated distensibility coefficients (DC) using 2D CINE CMR imaging of the ascending (AAo) and descending aorta (DAo). Segmental aortic diameter and thickness of aortic plaques were determined by 3D T1 weighted CMR (spatial resolution 1mm3). Results PWV increased from 4.93 ± 0.54 m/s in 20–30 year-old to 8.06 ± 1.03 m/s in 70–80 year-old subjects. PWV was significantly lower in women compared to men (p < 0.0001). Increased blood pressure (systolic r = 0.36, p < 0.0001; diastolic r = 0.33, p = 0.0001; mean arterial pressure r = 0.37, p < 0.0001) correlated with PWV after adjustment for age and gender. Finally, PWV increased with increasing diameter of the aorta (ascending aorta r = 0.20, p = 0.026; aortic arch r = 0.24, p = 0.009; descending aorta r = 0.26, p = 0.004). Correlation of PWV and DC of the AAo and DAo or the mean of both was high (r = 0.69, r = 0.68, r = 0.73; p < 0.001). Conclusions 4D flow CMR was successfully applied to calculate aortic PWV and thus aortic stiffness. Findings showed a high correlation with distensibility coefficients representing local compliance of the aorta. Our novel method and reference data for PWV may provide a reliable biomarker for the identification of patients with underlying cardiovascular disease and optimal guidance of future treatment in studies or clinical routine.http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12968-018-0461-zAortaStiffnessPopulation-based study4D flow MRIPulse wave velocity
spellingShingle Andreas Harloff
Hanieh Mirzaee
Thomas Lodemann
Paul Hagenlocher
Thomas Wehrum
Judith Stuplich
Anja Hennemuth
Jürgen Hennig
Sebastian Grundmann
Werner Vach
Determination of aortic stiffness using 4D flow cardiovascular magnetic resonance - a population-based study
Journal of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance
Aorta
Stiffness
Population-based study
4D flow MRI
Pulse wave velocity
title Determination of aortic stiffness using 4D flow cardiovascular magnetic resonance - a population-based study
title_full Determination of aortic stiffness using 4D flow cardiovascular magnetic resonance - a population-based study
title_fullStr Determination of aortic stiffness using 4D flow cardiovascular magnetic resonance - a population-based study
title_full_unstemmed Determination of aortic stiffness using 4D flow cardiovascular magnetic resonance - a population-based study
title_short Determination of aortic stiffness using 4D flow cardiovascular magnetic resonance - a population-based study
title_sort determination of aortic stiffness using 4d flow cardiovascular magnetic resonance a population based study
topic Aorta
Stiffness
Population-based study
4D flow MRI
Pulse wave velocity
url http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12968-018-0461-z
work_keys_str_mv AT andreasharloff determinationofaorticstiffnessusing4dflowcardiovascularmagneticresonanceapopulationbasedstudy
AT haniehmirzaee determinationofaorticstiffnessusing4dflowcardiovascularmagneticresonanceapopulationbasedstudy
AT thomaslodemann determinationofaorticstiffnessusing4dflowcardiovascularmagneticresonanceapopulationbasedstudy
AT paulhagenlocher determinationofaorticstiffnessusing4dflowcardiovascularmagneticresonanceapopulationbasedstudy
AT thomaswehrum determinationofaorticstiffnessusing4dflowcardiovascularmagneticresonanceapopulationbasedstudy
AT judithstuplich determinationofaorticstiffnessusing4dflowcardiovascularmagneticresonanceapopulationbasedstudy
AT anjahennemuth determinationofaorticstiffnessusing4dflowcardiovascularmagneticresonanceapopulationbasedstudy
AT jurgenhennig determinationofaorticstiffnessusing4dflowcardiovascularmagneticresonanceapopulationbasedstudy
AT sebastiangrundmann determinationofaorticstiffnessusing4dflowcardiovascularmagneticresonanceapopulationbasedstudy
AT wernervach determinationofaorticstiffnessusing4dflowcardiovascularmagneticresonanceapopulationbasedstudy