Evaluation of SPH and FVM Models of Kinematically Prescribed Peristalsis-like Flow in a Tube

Peristaltic flow is important in many biological processes, including digestion, and forms an important component of any in silico model of the stomach. There is a clear need to verify the simulations of such flows. An analytical solution was identified that can be used for model verification, which...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Xinying Liu, Simon M. Harrison, Paul W. Cleary, David F. Fletcher
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2022-12-01
Series:Fluids
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2311-5521/8/1/6
_version_ 1797442714863665152
author Xinying Liu
Simon M. Harrison
Paul W. Cleary
David F. Fletcher
author_facet Xinying Liu
Simon M. Harrison
Paul W. Cleary
David F. Fletcher
author_sort Xinying Liu
collection DOAJ
description Peristaltic flow is important in many biological processes, including digestion, and forms an important component of any in silico model of the stomach. There is a clear need to verify the simulations of such flows. An analytical solution was identified that can be used for model verification, which gives an equation for the net volumetric flow over a cycle for an applied sinusoidal wall motion. Both a smooth particle hydrodynamics (SPH) code (from the CSIRO), which is being used to develop a stomach model that includes wall motion, buoyancy, acid secretion and food breakdown, and the Ansys Fluent Finite Volume Method (FVM) solver, that is widely used in industry for complex engineering flows, are used in this exercise. Both give excellent agreement with the analytic solution for the net flow over a cycle for a range of occlusion ratios of 0.1–0.6. Very similar velocity fields are obtained with the two methods. The impact of parameters affecting solution stability and accuracy are described and investigated. Having validated the moving wall capability of the SPH model it can be used with confidence in stomach simulations that include wall motion.
first_indexed 2024-03-09T12:46:00Z
format Article
id doaj.art-9195cd6870324b9d9da517928eaf8241
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2311-5521
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-09T12:46:00Z
publishDate 2022-12-01
publisher MDPI AG
record_format Article
series Fluids
spelling doaj.art-9195cd6870324b9d9da517928eaf82412023-11-30T22:12:46ZengMDPI AGFluids2311-55212022-12-0181610.3390/fluids8010006Evaluation of SPH and FVM Models of Kinematically Prescribed Peristalsis-like Flow in a TubeXinying Liu0Simon M. Harrison1Paul W. Cleary2David F. Fletcher3School of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW 2006, AustraliaCSIRO Data61, Clayton South, VIC 2168, AustraliaCSIRO Data61, Clayton South, VIC 2168, AustraliaSchool of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW 2006, AustraliaPeristaltic flow is important in many biological processes, including digestion, and forms an important component of any in silico model of the stomach. There is a clear need to verify the simulations of such flows. An analytical solution was identified that can be used for model verification, which gives an equation for the net volumetric flow over a cycle for an applied sinusoidal wall motion. Both a smooth particle hydrodynamics (SPH) code (from the CSIRO), which is being used to develop a stomach model that includes wall motion, buoyancy, acid secretion and food breakdown, and the Ansys Fluent Finite Volume Method (FVM) solver, that is widely used in industry for complex engineering flows, are used in this exercise. Both give excellent agreement with the analytic solution for the net flow over a cycle for a range of occlusion ratios of 0.1–0.6. Very similar velocity fields are obtained with the two methods. The impact of parameters affecting solution stability and accuracy are described and investigated. Having validated the moving wall capability of the SPH model it can be used with confidence in stomach simulations that include wall motion.https://www.mdpi.com/2311-5521/8/1/6peristaltic flowCFDsmooth particle hydrodynamicsfinite volume methodmodel verification
spellingShingle Xinying Liu
Simon M. Harrison
Paul W. Cleary
David F. Fletcher
Evaluation of SPH and FVM Models of Kinematically Prescribed Peristalsis-like Flow in a Tube
Fluids
peristaltic flow
CFD
smooth particle hydrodynamics
finite volume method
model verification
title Evaluation of SPH and FVM Models of Kinematically Prescribed Peristalsis-like Flow in a Tube
title_full Evaluation of SPH and FVM Models of Kinematically Prescribed Peristalsis-like Flow in a Tube
title_fullStr Evaluation of SPH and FVM Models of Kinematically Prescribed Peristalsis-like Flow in a Tube
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of SPH and FVM Models of Kinematically Prescribed Peristalsis-like Flow in a Tube
title_short Evaluation of SPH and FVM Models of Kinematically Prescribed Peristalsis-like Flow in a Tube
title_sort evaluation of sph and fvm models of kinematically prescribed peristalsis like flow in a tube
topic peristaltic flow
CFD
smooth particle hydrodynamics
finite volume method
model verification
url https://www.mdpi.com/2311-5521/8/1/6
work_keys_str_mv AT xinyingliu evaluationofsphandfvmmodelsofkinematicallyprescribedperistalsislikeflowinatube
AT simonmharrison evaluationofsphandfvmmodelsofkinematicallyprescribedperistalsislikeflowinatube
AT paulwcleary evaluationofsphandfvmmodelsofkinematicallyprescribedperistalsislikeflowinatube
AT davidffletcher evaluationofsphandfvmmodelsofkinematicallyprescribedperistalsislikeflowinatube