Quantifying the Adaptive Cycle.

The adaptive cycle was proposed as a conceptual model to portray patterns of change in complex systems. Despite the model having potential for elucidating change across systems, it has been used mainly as a metaphor, describing system dynamics qualitatively. We use a quantitative approach for testin...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: David G Angeler, Craig R Allen, Ahjond S Garmestani, Lance H Gunderson, Olle Hjerne, Monika Winder
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2015-01-01
Series:PLoS ONE
Online Access:http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC4696843?pdf=render
_version_ 1818192973320421376
author David G Angeler
Craig R Allen
Ahjond S Garmestani
Lance H Gunderson
Olle Hjerne
Monika Winder
author_facet David G Angeler
Craig R Allen
Ahjond S Garmestani
Lance H Gunderson
Olle Hjerne
Monika Winder
author_sort David G Angeler
collection DOAJ
description The adaptive cycle was proposed as a conceptual model to portray patterns of change in complex systems. Despite the model having potential for elucidating change across systems, it has been used mainly as a metaphor, describing system dynamics qualitatively. We use a quantitative approach for testing premises (reorganisation, conservatism, adaptation) in the adaptive cycle, using Baltic Sea phytoplankton communities as an example of such complex system dynamics. Phytoplankton organizes in recurring spring and summer blooms, a well-established paradigm in planktology and succession theory, with characteristic temporal trajectories during blooms that may be consistent with adaptive cycle phases. We used long-term (1994-2011) data and multivariate analysis of community structure to assess key components of the adaptive cycle. Specifically, we tested predictions about: reorganisation: spring and summer blooms comprise distinct community states; conservatism: community trajectories during individual adaptive cycles are conservative; and adaptation: phytoplankton species during blooms change in the long term. All predictions were supported by our analyses. Results suggest that traditional ecological paradigms such as phytoplankton successional models have potential for moving the adaptive cycle from a metaphor to a framework that can improve our understanding how complex systems organize and reorganize following collapse. Quantifying reorganization, conservatism and adaptation provides opportunities to cope with the intricacies and uncertainties associated with fast ecological change, driven by shifting system controls. Ultimately, combining traditional ecological paradigms with heuristics of complex system dynamics using quantitative approaches may help refine ecological theory and improve our understanding of the resilience of ecosystems.
first_indexed 2024-12-12T00:39:00Z
format Article
id doaj.art-9196db5dc947473da13c85448e864dbd
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1932-6203
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-12T00:39:00Z
publishDate 2015-01-01
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
record_format Article
series PLoS ONE
spelling doaj.art-9196db5dc947473da13c85448e864dbd2022-12-22T00:44:18ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032015-01-011012e014605310.1371/journal.pone.0146053Quantifying the Adaptive Cycle.David G AngelerCraig R AllenAhjond S GarmestaniLance H GundersonOlle HjerneMonika WinderThe adaptive cycle was proposed as a conceptual model to portray patterns of change in complex systems. Despite the model having potential for elucidating change across systems, it has been used mainly as a metaphor, describing system dynamics qualitatively. We use a quantitative approach for testing premises (reorganisation, conservatism, adaptation) in the adaptive cycle, using Baltic Sea phytoplankton communities as an example of such complex system dynamics. Phytoplankton organizes in recurring spring and summer blooms, a well-established paradigm in planktology and succession theory, with characteristic temporal trajectories during blooms that may be consistent with adaptive cycle phases. We used long-term (1994-2011) data and multivariate analysis of community structure to assess key components of the adaptive cycle. Specifically, we tested predictions about: reorganisation: spring and summer blooms comprise distinct community states; conservatism: community trajectories during individual adaptive cycles are conservative; and adaptation: phytoplankton species during blooms change in the long term. All predictions were supported by our analyses. Results suggest that traditional ecological paradigms such as phytoplankton successional models have potential for moving the adaptive cycle from a metaphor to a framework that can improve our understanding how complex systems organize and reorganize following collapse. Quantifying reorganization, conservatism and adaptation provides opportunities to cope with the intricacies and uncertainties associated with fast ecological change, driven by shifting system controls. Ultimately, combining traditional ecological paradigms with heuristics of complex system dynamics using quantitative approaches may help refine ecological theory and improve our understanding of the resilience of ecosystems.http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC4696843?pdf=render
spellingShingle David G Angeler
Craig R Allen
Ahjond S Garmestani
Lance H Gunderson
Olle Hjerne
Monika Winder
Quantifying the Adaptive Cycle.
PLoS ONE
title Quantifying the Adaptive Cycle.
title_full Quantifying the Adaptive Cycle.
title_fullStr Quantifying the Adaptive Cycle.
title_full_unstemmed Quantifying the Adaptive Cycle.
title_short Quantifying the Adaptive Cycle.
title_sort quantifying the adaptive cycle
url http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC4696843?pdf=render
work_keys_str_mv AT davidgangeler quantifyingtheadaptivecycle
AT craigrallen quantifyingtheadaptivecycle
AT ahjondsgarmestani quantifyingtheadaptivecycle
AT lancehgunderson quantifyingtheadaptivecycle
AT ollehjerne quantifyingtheadaptivecycle
AT monikawinder quantifyingtheadaptivecycle