Topography not tenure controls extent of wildfire within Mountain Ash forests

Two high intensity wildfire events, 70 years apart, burnt large areas of Mountain Ash forests in the Central Highlands, Victoria, Australia. Both resulted in Royal Commissions (the strongest form of judicial inquiry in Australia) as to their cause(s) owing to large losses of life and property. Here...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Mark A Adams, Tina L Bell, Mana Gharun
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: IOP Publishing 2021-01-01
Series:Environmental Research Letters
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/abe57e
_version_ 1827870370159394816
author Mark A Adams
Tina L Bell
Mana Gharun
author_facet Mark A Adams
Tina L Bell
Mana Gharun
author_sort Mark A Adams
collection DOAJ
description Two high intensity wildfire events, 70 years apart, burnt large areas of Mountain Ash forests in the Central Highlands, Victoria, Australia. Both resulted in Royal Commissions (the strongest form of judicial inquiry in Australia) as to their cause(s) owing to large losses of life and property. Here we tested the hypothesis that site ‘wetness’—determined using a Topographic Wetness Index—is a major determinant of the extent of fire (% of sample points that burnt) within high intensity wildfire events and across tenures. We show that wetness dominated the extent of fire in these forests in both the 1939 and 2009 wildfire events. Mountain Ash forests are now strongly skewed in their distribution, with wetter and older forests favored by protected tenures (e.g. National Parks) designed to meet needs for water and conservation. In 2009, the extent of fire at the stand scale in water catchments and conservation tenures was twice that in 1939. In land tenures with multiple uses (e.g. State Forests), the extent of fire was one-third less in 2009 than it was in 1939. Topographic controls on water availability, and major droughts, will likely continue to dominate the extent and likelihood of fire in these forests.
first_indexed 2024-03-12T15:55:52Z
format Article
id doaj.art-919808e415684dcba254229e9d580c96
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1748-9326
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-12T15:55:52Z
publishDate 2021-01-01
publisher IOP Publishing
record_format Article
series Environmental Research Letters
spelling doaj.art-919808e415684dcba254229e9d580c962023-08-09T14:55:30ZengIOP PublishingEnvironmental Research Letters1748-93262021-01-0116404402110.1088/1748-9326/abe57eTopography not tenure controls extent of wildfire within Mountain Ash forestsMark A Adams0https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8154-0097Tina L Bell1Mana Gharun2Department of Chemistry and Biotechnology, Faculty of Science, Engineering and Technology, Swinburne University of Technology , Hawthorn, Vic, Australia; School of Life and Environmental Sciences, University of Sydney , Sydney, NSW, AustraliaSchool of Life and Environmental Sciences, University of Sydney , Sydney, NSW, AustraliaInstitute of Agricultural Sciences, ETH Zurich , Zurich, SwitzerlandTwo high intensity wildfire events, 70 years apart, burnt large areas of Mountain Ash forests in the Central Highlands, Victoria, Australia. Both resulted in Royal Commissions (the strongest form of judicial inquiry in Australia) as to their cause(s) owing to large losses of life and property. Here we tested the hypothesis that site ‘wetness’—determined using a Topographic Wetness Index—is a major determinant of the extent of fire (% of sample points that burnt) within high intensity wildfire events and across tenures. We show that wetness dominated the extent of fire in these forests in both the 1939 and 2009 wildfire events. Mountain Ash forests are now strongly skewed in their distribution, with wetter and older forests favored by protected tenures (e.g. National Parks) designed to meet needs for water and conservation. In 2009, the extent of fire at the stand scale in water catchments and conservation tenures was twice that in 1939. In land tenures with multiple uses (e.g. State Forests), the extent of fire was one-third less in 2009 than it was in 1939. Topographic controls on water availability, and major droughts, will likely continue to dominate the extent and likelihood of fire in these forests.https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/abe57ewildfirebushfiretopographywater availabilityland tenuresustainability
spellingShingle Mark A Adams
Tina L Bell
Mana Gharun
Topography not tenure controls extent of wildfire within Mountain Ash forests
Environmental Research Letters
wildfire
bushfire
topography
water availability
land tenure
sustainability
title Topography not tenure controls extent of wildfire within Mountain Ash forests
title_full Topography not tenure controls extent of wildfire within Mountain Ash forests
title_fullStr Topography not tenure controls extent of wildfire within Mountain Ash forests
title_full_unstemmed Topography not tenure controls extent of wildfire within Mountain Ash forests
title_short Topography not tenure controls extent of wildfire within Mountain Ash forests
title_sort topography not tenure controls extent of wildfire within mountain ash forests
topic wildfire
bushfire
topography
water availability
land tenure
sustainability
url https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/abe57e
work_keys_str_mv AT markaadams topographynottenurecontrolsextentofwildfirewithinmountainashforests
AT tinalbell topographynottenurecontrolsextentofwildfirewithinmountainashforests
AT managharun topographynottenurecontrolsextentofwildfirewithinmountainashforests